skip to main content
10.1145/3501710.3519531acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

A Multiresolution Analysis of Temporal Logic

Published:04 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Is it possible to determine whether a signal violates a formula in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), if the monitor only has access to a low-resolution version of the signal? We answer this question affirmatively by demonstrating that temporal logic has a multiresolution structure, which parallels the multiresolution structure of signals. A formula in discrete-time Signal Temporal Logic (STL) is equivalently defined via the set of signals that satisfy it, known as its language. If a wavelet decomposition x = y + d is performed on each signal x in the language, we end up with two signal sets Y and D, where Y contains the low-resolution approximation signals y, and D contains the detail signals d needed to reconstruct the x’s. This paper provides a complete computational characterization of both Y and D using a novel constraint set encoding of STL, s.t. x satisfies a formula if and only if its decomposition signals satisfy their respective encoding constraints. Then a conservative logical approximation of Y is also provided: namely, we show that Y is over approximated by the language of a formula − 1. By iterating the decomposition, we obtain a sequence of lower-resolution formulas − 1, − 2, − 3,... which thus constitute a multiresolution analysis of. This work lays the foundation for multiresolution monitoring in distributed systems. One potential application of these results is a multiresolution monitor that can detect specification violation early by simply observing a low-resolution version of the signal to be monitored. 1

References

  1. Yashwanth S. R. Annapureddy and Georgios E. Fainekos. 2010. Ant Colonies for Temporal Logic Falsification of Hybrid Systems. In Proc. of the 36th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics. 91–96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eugene Asarin and Aldric Degorre. 2009. Volume and Entropy of Regular Timed Languages: Analytic Approach. In Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems, Joël Ouaknineand Frits W. Vaandrager (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 13–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Basnet and H. Abbas. 2020. Logical Signal Processing: A Fourier Analysis of Temporal Logic. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Runtime Verification (RV). 359–382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Davide G. Cavezza, Dalal Alrajeh, and András Gyorgy. 2021. A Weakness Measure for GR(1) Formulae. Formal Aspects of Computing 33 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexandre Donzé, Thomas Ferrère, and Oded Maler. 2013. Efficient Robust Monitoring for STL. In Computer Aided Verification, Natasha Sharygina and Helmut Veith (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 264–279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexandre Donzé and Oded Maler. 2010. Robust Satisfaction of Temporal Logic over Real-valued Signals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Alexandre Donzé, Oded Maler, Ezio Bartocci, Dejan Nickovic, Radu Grosu, and Scott Smolka. 2012. On Temporal Logic and Signal Processing. In Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis, Supratik Chakraborty and Madhavan Mukund (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 92–106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michael W. Frazier. 1999. A Linear Algebra Introduction to Wavelets. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paul Halmos. 1950. Measure Theory. Van Nostrand and Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Jaksić, E. Bartocci, R. Grosu, and D. Nicković. 2018. An Algebraic Framework for Runtime Verification. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 37, 11(2018), 2233–2243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yogi Joshi, Guy Martin Tchamgoue, and Sebastian Fischmeister. 2017. Runtime Verification of LTL on Lossy Traces. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing(Marrakech, Morocco) (SAC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Oded Maler and Dejan Nickovic. 2004. Monitoring Temporal Properties of Continuous Signals. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stéphane Mallat. 2016. Understanding deep convolutional networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 374 (April 2016). Issue 2065.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hector Mesa. 2005. Adapted wavelets for pattern detection. In Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition. Springer, 933–944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Pelphrey and H. Abbas. 2022. MRA Monitoring. (2022). https://github.com/sabotagelab/MRA-MonitoringGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Raman, A. Donze, M. Maasoumy, R. M. Murray, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, and S. A. Seshia. 2014. Model predictive control with signal temporal logic specifications. In 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2014.7039363Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alena Rodionova, Ezio Bartocci, Dejan Nickovic, and Radu Grosu. 2016. Temporal Logic as Filtering. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (Vienna, Austria) (HSCC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883817.2883839Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Prasad Sistla, Miloý Žefran, Yao Feng, and Yue Ben. 2014. Timely Monitoring of Partially Observable Stochastic Systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control(Berlin, Germany) (HSCC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2562059.2562136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J.-L. Starck, F. Murtagh, and A. Bijaoui. 1998. Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott D. Stoller, Ezio Bartocci, Justin Seyster, Radu Grosu, Klaus Havelund, Scott A. Smolka, and Erez Zadok. 2012. Runtime Verification with State Estimation. In Runtime Verification, Sarfraz Khurshid and Koushik Sen (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 193–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HSCC '22: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control
    May 2022
    265 pages
    ISBN:9781450391962
    DOI:10.1145/3501710

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 May 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate153of373submissions,41%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format