skip to main content
10.1145/3501774.3501783acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Synthesis of a Leadership Model for DevOps Adoption

Published:26 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The first decade of DevOps-orientation in software-intensive organizational environments is often characterized with an emerging set of skills that support DevOps practice adoption, targeting a cross-functional collaborative culture; with an aim of achieving a shift in mindset, skillset, and toolset. We investigate DevOps adoption constructs to facilitate development of a formative measurement model to support leadership throughout the DevOps transitional journey. The model and its constructs are designed and validated with a multi-method approach. Initially an exploratory study of a survey is conducted with 250 respondents 76% of whom possess leadership roles, 93% work in Europe and Middle East, and two-thirds are practicing as DevOps practitioners. Pertinent model indicators are produced and grouped under constructs based on survey results and validated using PLS-SEM. The formative structural model is presented and validated in three separate focus group sessions, comprising of respectively seven (7), five (5), and seven (7) participants all of whom had held leadership positions; from countries including USA, UK, The Netherlands, UAE, Greece, Georgia, Switzerland. Seventeen (17) focus group participants provided additional responses through a focus group in-session survey, which allowed feedback on specific model constructs. Results indicate that a set of practices, a set of skills, a set of metrics, DevOps adoption planning and the existence of the DevOps adoption leader roles, should be part of organizational aspirations in the definition of leadership in a DevOps transition path.

References

  1. Verner, J., Sampson J., Cerpa, N. 2008. What factors lead to software project failure?, In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 71-80. doi: 10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632095. Marrakech, Morocco. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2008.4632095.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Welder Pinheiro Luz, Gustavo Pinto and Rodrigo Bonifácio. 2019. Adopting DevOps in the real world: A theory, a model, and a case study, Journal of Systems and Software, pp.157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.083Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jez Humble and David Farley, 2010. Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ISO - ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017 - Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes: https://www.iso.org/standard/63712.html, Accessed on 07/05/2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mary Poppendieck and Tom Poppendieck, 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Len Bass and Ingo Weber, Liming Zhu, 2015. DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective, Addison Wesley, US.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Krikor Maroukian and Stephen Gulliver, 2020. Leading DevOps practice and principle adoption. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Technology Convergence and Services (ITCSE’20). 10, 5, AIRCC, Computer Science and Information Technology, 41-56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wouter J.W. Geurts, 2016. Faster is Better and Cheaper, Wiley Online, vol. 26, pp. 1002-1015, Jul. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00207.x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Senapathi Mali, Jim Buchan and H. Osman, 2018. DevOps Capabilities, Practices, and Challenges: Insights from a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Robin Bolscher and Maya Daneva. 2019. Designing Software Architecture to Support Continuous Delivery and DevOps: A Systematic Literature Review, In Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT 2019), Prague, Czech Republic. DOI: 10.5220/0007837000270039.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lucy Ellen Lwakatare, Pasi Kuvaja and Markku Oivo. 2016. An exploratory study of DevOps: extending the dimensions of DevOps with practices, In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 91–99, IARIA, Rome.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin Kropp, Andreas Meier, Craig Anslow and Robert Biddle. 2018. Satisfaction, Practices, and Influences in Agile Software Development, In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), Association for Computing Machinery, USA, pp112–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Anna Wiedemann and Manuel Wiesche. 2018. Are You Ready for DevOps? Required Skill Set for DevOps Teams, In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Portsmouth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Themba Masombuka, Ernest Mnkandla. 2018. A DevOps collaboration culture acceptance model, In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT), Association for Computing Machinery, USA, pp279–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3278681.3278714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Breno B. Nicolau de França, Helvio Jeronimo and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2016. Characterizing DevOps by hearing multiple voices, In Proceedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 53–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2973839.2973845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mary Sánchez-Gordón and Ricardo Colomo-Palacios. 2018. Characterizing DevOps Culture: A Systematic Literature Review, Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE), Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol.918, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00623-5_1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M Rajkumar, Anil Kumar Pole, Vittalraya Shenoy Adige and Prabal Mahanta. 2016. DevOps culture and its impact on cloud delivery and software development, In Proceedings International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA), pp1-6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCA.2016.7578902.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Pilar Rodríguez, Ali reza Haghighatkhaha, Lucy Ellen Lwakatare, Susanna Teppola, Tanja Suomalainen, Juho Eskeli, Teemu Karvonen, Pasi Kuvaja, June M.Verner, Markku Oivo. 2017. Continuous deployment of software intensive products and services: A systematic mapping study, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 123, pp. 263-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. GitHub Adidas DevOps Maturity Framework. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://github.com/adidas/adidas-devops-maturity-frameworkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bernard M. Bass. 1998. Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gary A. Yukl. 2020. Leadership in organizations, Pearson Education, Essex, ISBN13:978-1-292-31440-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nathan Eva, Mulyadi Robin, Sen Sendjaya, Dirk van Dierendonck and Robert C.Liden. 2019. Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 1, 111-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Krikor Maroukian and Stephen Gulliver. 2020. The Link Between Transformational and Servant Leadership in DevOps-Oriented Organizations. In Proceedings of the 2020 European Symposium on Software Engineering (ESSE 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3393822.3432340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Puppet, DORA. State of DevOps Report 2020. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://puppet.com/resources/report/2020-state-of-devops-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill. 2018. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th Edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Judith Green and Nicki Thorogood. 2009. Qualitative methods for health research. Sage, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yukl, G.A., Gardner, III, W.L., 2020. Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education. Essex. ISBN13:978-1-292-31440-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jyrki Kontio, Laura Lehtola and Johanna Bragge, 2004. Using the Focus Group Method in Software Engineering: Obtaining Practitioner and User Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE '04). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 271–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESE.2004.1334914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. David L. Morgan. 2003. Focus groups. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22 (1), 129–152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joe Langford and Deana McDonaugh, 2003. Focus Groups. Supporting Effective Product Development, Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. European Commission definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved June 4, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/sme-definition_enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Joseph F. Hair, Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle. 2018. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eurpean Business Review, Vol. 31:1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Joseph F. Hair, G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, Marko Sarstedt, 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Burke Johnson, Larry Christensen,. 2008. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Inc., Lose Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Anol Bhattacherjee. 2001. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly. 25, 351-370. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Synthesis of a Leadership Model for DevOps Adoption
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ESSE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 European Symposium on Software Engineering
            November 2021
            172 pages
            ISBN:9781450385060
            DOI:10.1145/3501774

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 March 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format