skip to main content
10.1145/3502060.3503616acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbecbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Regression and Machine Learning analysis to predict the length of stay in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2022Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Parker M and Johansen A 2006 Hip fracture BMJ 333 27–30Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Emmerson B R, Varacallo M and Inman D 2021 Hip Fracture Overview StatPearls (Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gullberg B, Johnell O and Kanis J A 1997 World-wide projections for hip fracture Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ. Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA 7 407–13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Nieves J W, Bilezikian J P, Lane J M, Einhorn T A, Wang Y, Steinbuch M and Cosman F 2010 Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ. Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA 21 399–408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Florschutz A V, Langford J R, Haidukewych G J and Koval K J 2015 Femoral neck fractures: current management J. Orthop. Trauma 29 121–9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimon J H and Hughston J C 1967 Unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the hip J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 49 440–50Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Seinsheimer F 1978 Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 60 300–6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zuckerman J D 1996 Hip fracture N. Engl. J. Med. 334 1519–25Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Woolf A D and Akesson K 2003 Preventing fractures in elderly people BMJ 327 89–95Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Correa-Pérez A, Delgado-Silveira E, Martín-Aragón S, Rojo-Sanchís A M and Cruz-Jentoft A J 2019 Fall-risk increasing drugs and prevalence of polypharmacy in older patients discharged from an Orthogeriatric Unit after a hip fracture Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 31 969–75Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Daoust R, Paquet J, Moore L, Émond M, Gosselin S, Lavigne G, Choinière M, Boulanger A, Mac-Thiong J-M and Chauny J-M 2018 Recent opioid use and fall-related injury among older patients with trauma CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. J. Assoc. Medicale Can. 190 E500–6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Stevens J A and Olson S 2000 Reducing falls and resulting hip fractures among older women MMWR Recomm. Rep. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. Recomm. Rep. 49 3–12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Veronese N and Maggi S 2018 Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture Injury 49 1458–60Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rozental T D, Walley K C, Demissie S, Caksa S, Martinez-Betancourt A, Parker A M, Tsai J N, Yu E W and Bouxsein M L 2018 Bone Material Strength Index as Measured by Impact Microindentation in Postmenopausal Women With Distal Radius and Hip Fractures J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 33 621–6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zaslavsky O, Zelber-Sagi S, LaCroix A Z, Brunner R L, Wallace R B, Cochrane B B and Woods N F 2017 Comparison of the Simplified sWHI and the Standard CHS Frailty Phenotypes for Prediction of Mortality, Incident Falls, and Hip Fractures in Older Women J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 72 1394–400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tomasevic-Todorovic S, Vazic A, Issaka A and Hanna F 2018 Comparative assessment of fracture risk among osteoporosis and osteopenia patients: a cross-sectional study Open Access Rheumatol. Res. Rev. 10 61–6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Axelsson K F, Wallander M, Johansson H, Lundh D and Lorentzon M 2017 Hip fracture risk and safety with alendronate treatment in the oldest-old J. Intern. Med. 282 546–59Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bhandari M and Swiontkowski M 2017 Management of Acute Hip Fracture N. Engl. J. Med. 377 2053–62Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Folbert E C, Hegeman J H, Gierveld R, van Netten J J, Velde D van der, Ten Duis H J and Slaets J P 2017 Complications during hospitalization and risk factors in elderly patients with hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 137 507–15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Trivedi N N, Abola M V, Kim C Y, Sivasundaram L, Smith E J and Ochenjele G 2020 The Incremental Cost of Inpatient Venous Thromboembolism After Hip Fracture Surgery J. Orthop. Trauma 34 169–73Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Thakker A, Briggs N, Maeda A, Byrne J, Davey J R and Jackson T D 2018 Reducing the rate of post-surgical urinary tract infections in orthopedic patients BMJ Open Qual. 7 e000177Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang S-C, Lai J-I, Lu M-C, Lin K-H, Wang W-S, Lo S-S and Lai Y-C 2018 Reduction in the incidence of pneumonia in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery: An inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program Medicine (Baltimore) 97 e11845Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiari P, Forni C, Guberti M, Gazineo D, Ronzoni S and D'Alessandro F 2017 Predictive Factors for Pressure Ulcers in an Older Adult Population Hospitalized for Hip Fractures: A Prognostic Cohort Study PLoS ONE 12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Badgeley M A, Zech J R, Oakden-Rayner L, Glicksberg B S, Liu M, Gale W, McConnell M V, Percha B, Snyder T M and Dudley J T 2019 Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables Npj Digit. Med. 2 1–10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Heetveld M J, Liew S, Scott T, Bzovsky S, Heels-Ansdell D, Zhou Q, Swiontkowski M, Schemitsch E H, and FAITH Investigators 2018 Factors associated with health-related quality of life, hip function, and health utility after operative management of femoral neck fractures Bone Jt. J. 100-B 361–9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruggiero C, Bonamassa L, Pelini L, Prioletta I, Cianferotti L, Metozzi A, Benvenuti E, Brandi G, Guazzini A, Santoro G C, Mecocci P, Black D and Brandi M L 2017 Early post-surgical cognitive dysfunction is a risk factor for mortality among hip fracture hospitalized older persons Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ. Result Coop. Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA 28 667–75Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Xu B Y, Yan S, Low L L, Vasanwala F F and Low S G 2019 Predictors of poor functional outcomes and mortality in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 20 568Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Improta G, Balato G, Romano M, Ponsiglione A M, Raiola E, Russo M A, Cuccaro P, Santillo L C and Cesarelli M 2017 Improving performances of the knee replacement surgery process by applying DMAIC principles J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 23 1401–7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Improta G, Balato G, Romano M, Carpentieri F, Bifulco P, Russo M A, Rosa D, Triassi M and Cesarelli M 2015 Lean Six Sigma: a new approach to the management of patients undergoing prosthetic hip replacement surgery J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 21 662–72Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Scala A, Ponsiglione A M, Loperto I, Della Vecchia A, Borrelli A, Russo G, Triassi M and Improta G 2021 Lean Six Sigma Approach for Reducing Length of Hospital Stay for Patients with Femur Fracture in a University Hospital Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18 2843Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ricciardi C, Balato G, Romano M, Santalucia I, Cesarelli M and Improta G 2020 Fast track surgery for knee replacement surgery: a lean six sigma approach TQM J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Trunfio T A, Scala A, Vecchia A D, Marra A and Borrelli A 2021 Multiple Regression Model to Predict Length of Hospital Stay for Patients Undergoing Femur Fracture Surgery at “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona” University Hospital 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference IFMBE Proceedings ed T Jarm, A Cvetkoska, S Mahnič-Kalamiza and D Miklavcic (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 840–7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Scala A, Trunfio T A, Vecchia A D, Marra A and Borrelli A 2021 Lean Six Sigma Approach to Implement a Femur Fracture Care Pathway at “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona” University Hospital 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference IFMBE Proceedings ed T Jarm, A Cvetkoska, S Mahnič-Kalamiza and D Miklavcic (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 740–9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ponsiglione A M, Ricciardi C, Improta G, Orabona G D, Sorrentino A, Amato F, Romano M, Ponsiglione A M, Ricciardi C, Improta G, Orabona G D, Sorrentino A, Amato F and Romano M 2021 A Six Sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for Health Technology Assessment of two antibiotics Math. Biosci. Eng. 18 3469–90Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Karnuta J M, Navarro S M, Haeberle H S, Billow D G, Krebs V E and Ramkumar P N 2019 Bundled Care for Hip Fractures: A Machine-Learning Approach to an Untenable Patient-Specific Payment Model. J. Orthop. TraumaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Navarro S M, Wang E Y, Haeberle H S, Mont M A, Krebs V E, Patterson B M and Ramkumar P N 2018 Machine Learning and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Forecasting for a Patient-Specific Payment Model J. Arthroplasty 33 3617–23Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Improta G, Ponsiglione A M, Parente G, Romano M, Cesarelli G, Rea T, Russo M and Triassi M 2021 Evaluation of Medical Training Courses Satisfaction: Qualitative Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process 8th European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference IFMBE Proceedings ed T Jarm, A Cvetkoska, S Mahnič-Kalamiza and D Miklavcic (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 518–26Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramkumar P N, Navarro S M, Haeberle H S, Karnuta J M, Mont M A, Iannotti J P, Patterson B M and Krebs V E 2019 Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Applications to Length of Stay and Payment Models J. Arthroplasty 34 632–7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ricciardi C, Ponsiglione A M, Converso G, Santalucia I, Triassi M and Improta G 2021 Implementation and validation of a new method to model voluntary departures from emergency departments Math. Biosci. Eng. 18 253–73Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Regression and Machine Learning analysis to predict the length of stay in patients undergoing hip replacement surgery
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          BECB 2021: 2021 International Symposium on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology
          August 2021
          262 pages
          ISBN:9781450384117
          DOI:10.1145/3502060

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 February 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format