skip to main content
10.1145/3502434.3502466acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of School Learning Organisation Scale and its Validation in the Indian Context

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

To achieve the deliverables of the 21st-century learning agendas, the education system needs to innovate itself in a multi-faceted manner, enabling schools as agents of organisational change through innovation, collaboration, empowerment and effective school functioning. A learning organisation model has been proposed based on review of articles suitable for the Indian Education System. Lack of a comprehensive tool assessing the school effectiveness and educational outcomes necessitates development and validation of school learning organisation scale for Indian setting. The current study examines the psychometrics of the school learning organisation (SLO) scale, exploratory factor analyses (EFA) revealed five factors: School Vision, Professional Development of Teachers, Embedded systems, Learning Community & Collegiality and Leadership & Technology Usage. Finally, the proposed model was examined to test its goodness of fit by applying SEM through confirmatory factor analysis.

References

  1. Ulf Andersson, Desireé Blankenburg Holm, and Martin Johanson. 2005. Opportunities, relational embeddedness and network structure. In Managing opportunity development in business networks. Springer, 27–48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ASER. 2006. Annual Status of Education Report (Rural). Pratham: New Delhi (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ASER. 2018. Annual Status of Education Report (Rural). Pratham: New Delhi (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kerry Barnett and John McCormick. 2003. Vision, relationships and teacher motivation: A case study. Journal of Educational Administration(2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeanette Berman and Lorraine Graham. 2018. Learning intervention: Educational casework and responsive teaching for sustainable learning. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnie Billingsley, David DeMatthews, Kaylan Connally, and James McLeskey. 2018. Leadership for effective inclusive schools: Considerations for preparation and reform. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education 42, 1 (2018), 65–81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. John Burgoyne, Mike Pedler, and Tom Boydell. 1994. Towards the learning company: concepts and practices. McGraw-Hill London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S Cherkowski and K Walker. 2016. Flourishing leadership: Engaging purpose, passion, and play in the work of leading schools. Journal of Educational Administration 54, 4 (2016), 378–392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Linda Darling-Hammond, Maria E Hyler, and Madelyn Gardner. 2017. Effective teacher professional development.Learning Policy Institute(2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Christopher Day and Pamela Sammons. 2013. Successful leadership: A review of the international literature.ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Terrence E Deal and Kent D Peterson. 2016. Shaping school culture. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chris Dede. 2007. Transforming education for the 21st century: New pedagogies that help all students attain sophisticated learning outcomes. Commissioned by the NCSU Friday Institute, February (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael Fullan. 1993. Why teachers must become change agents. Educational leadership 50 (1993), 12–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Michael Fullan. 2015. Leadership from the Middle. Education Canada 55, 4 (2015), 22–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. David A Garvin. 1993. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71 (4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andy Hargreaves and Michael T O’Connor. 2018. Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fred Kofman and Peter M Senge. 1993. Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational dynamics 22, 2 (1993), 5–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Anna Maier, Julia Daniel, Jeannie Oakes, and Livia Lam. 2017. Community Schools as an Effective School Improvement Strategy: A Review of the Evidence.Learning Policy Institute(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Victoria J Marsick and Karen E Watkins. 1996. Adult educators and the challenge of the learning organization. Adult learning 7, 4 (1996), 18–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Victoria J Marsick and Karen E Watkins. 1999. 13 Envisioning new organisations for learning. Understanding learning at work(1999), 199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Victoria J Marsick and Karen E Watkins. 1999. Looking again at learning in the learning organization: a tool that can turn into a weapon!The Learning Organization(1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Joseph F Murphy and Karen Seashore Louis. 2018. Positive school leadership: Building capacity and strengthening relationships. Teachers College Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. NCERT. 1999. Sixth All India Educational Survey. NCERT: New Delhi (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anders Örtenblad. 2002. A Typology of the Idea of Learning Organization. Management Learning 33, 2 (2002), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602332004 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602332004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Dalin Per. 2004. School development: Theories & Strategoes. A&C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andreas Schleicher. 2015. Schools for 21st-Century Learners: Strong Leaders, Confident Teachers, Innovative Approaches. International Summit on the Teaching Profession.ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Peter Senge. 1990. Peter Senge and the learning organization. Rcuperado de (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Louise Stoll and Marco Kools. 2017. The school as a learning organisation: a review revisiting and extending a timely concept. Journal of professional capital and community (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hechuan Sun, Bert P. M. Creemers, and Rob de Jong. 2007. Contextual factors and effective school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18, 1 (2007), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450601058287 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450601058287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Barbara G Tabachnick. 2012. Fidell, l. S.(1996) Using multivariate statistics. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Karen E Watkins and Victoria J Marsick. 1993. Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. ERIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Development of School Learning Organisation Scale and its Validation in the Indian Context
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICEEL '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning
              November 2021
              281 pages
              ISBN:9781450385749
              DOI:10.1145/3502434

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 11 February 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format