skip to main content
10.1145/3503823.3503877acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fast Rules to Speedup HEVC to VVC Transcoding

Published:22 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advent of the newly introduced Versatile Video Coding Standard (VVC) the need for converting legacy content from its widely used predecessor, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), to the new format has emerged due to the higher compression performance of the new codec. The most straightforward transcoding solution is to fully decode and re-encode the incoming video signal to the new coding format, in other respects a notably time-consuming operation. In this paper, we propose a fast HEVC to VVC transcoding algorithm that exploits the high correlation between block partitioning decisions in HEVC and VVC in order to early terminate the block partitioning process in VVC and consequently reduce the transcoding time complexity.

References

  1. Alex Borges, Daniel Palomino, Bruno Zatt, Marcelo Porto, and Guilherme Correa. 2021. Fast VP9-to-AV1 Transcoding based on Block Partitioning Inheritance. In 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, 555–559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alex Borges, Bruno Zatt, Marcelo Porto, and Guilherme Correa. 2019. Fast HEVC-to-AV1 transcoding based on coding unit depth inheritance. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 3571–3575.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Frank Bossen 2013. Common test conditions and software reference configurations. JCTVC-L1100 12, 7 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frank Bossen, Xiang Li, and Karsten Suehring. 2020. AHG report: Test model software development (AHG3). In JVET meeting, no JVET-T0003 ITU-T and ISO/IEC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin Bross, Jianle Chen, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Gary J Sullivan, and Ye-Kui Wang. 2021. Developments in international video coding standardization after avc, with an overview of versatile video coding (vvc). Proc. IEEE (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Chen, J., Ye, Y., Kim. 2020. Algorithm description for Versatile Video Coding and Test Model 10 (VTM 10). In JVET meeting, no. JVET-S2002. ITU- T and ISO/IEC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chi Ching Chi, Mauricio Alvarez-Mesa, Ben Juurlink, Gordon Clare, Félix Henry, Stéphane Pateux, and Thomas Schierl. 2012. Parallel scalability and efficiency of HEVC parallelization approaches. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 22, 12(2012), 1827–1838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Antonio Jesús Díaz-Honrubia, José Luis Martínez, José Miguel Puerta, José A Gámez, Jan De Cock, and Pedro Cuenca. 2014. Fast quadtree level decision algorithm for H. 264/HEVC transcoder. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2497–2501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. GMDT Forecast 2019. Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2017–2022. Update 2017(2019), 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jean-François Franche and Stéphane Coulombe. 2017. Efficient h. 264-to-hevc transcoding based on motion propagation and post-order traversal of coding tree units. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 28, 12(2017), 3452–3466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David García-Lucas, Gabriel Cebrián-Márquez, Antonio Jesús Díaz-Honrubia, Thanuja Mallikarachchi, and Pedro Cuenca. 2020. Efficient HEVC-to-VVC Transcoder Based On A Bayesian Classifier For The First Quadtree Depth Level. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 628–632.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Naty Sidaty, Wassim Hamidouche, Olivier Déforges, Pierrick Philippe, and Jérôme Fournier. 2019. Compression performance of the versatile video coding: HD and UHD visual quality monitoring. In 2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS). IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gary J Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Woo-Jin Han, and Thomas Wiegand. 2012. Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 22, 12(2012), 1649–1668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ye-Kui Wang, Robert Skupin, Miska M Hannuksela, Sachin Deshpande, Virginie Drugeon, Rickard Sjöberg, Byeongdoo Choi, Vadim Seregin, Yago Sanchez, Jill M Boyce, 2021. The high-level syntax of the versatile video coding (VVC) standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Thomas Wiegand, Gary J Sullivan, Gisle Bjontegaard, and Ajay Luthra. 2003. Overview of the H. 264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 13, 7(2003), 560–576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jingyao Xu, Mai Xu, Yanan Wei, Zulin Wang, and Zhenyu Guan. 2018. Fast H. 264 to HEVC transcoding: A deep learning method. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 21, 7 (2018), 1633–1645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Linwei Zhu, Yun Zhang, Na Li, Gangyi Jiang, and Sam Kwong. 2016. Machine learning based fast H. 264/AVC to HEVC transcoding exploiting block partition similarity. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 38 (2016), 824–837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fast Rules to Speedup HEVC to VVC Transcoding
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PCI '21: Proceedings of the 25th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
        November 2021
        499 pages

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 February 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format