Kristina Kölln
ABSTRACT
Gamification is widely known and implemented for various purposes. But it is also criticized for recurring lack of quality. Many researchers developed gamification frameworks and tools to ensure a purposeful gamification, but these theoretical frameworks are used by less than half of gamification research. There are numerous gamification frameworks and it is difficult to find a specific one. Our research aims to tackle this problem by providing a fast and easy process, that allows finding a gamification framework for a specific use case. We want to achieve this, by identifying selection and quality criteria and developing a method to match these criteria to a gamification framework. Succeeding this we will develop a tool, that allows the user to identify the most suited gamification frameworks for any combination of the selection criteria.
- Alischa Thomas, Frederik Bader, Jörg Thomaschewski, and Maria Rauschenberger. 2021. Integrating Gamification: The Human-Centered Gamification Process. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2021). SCITEPRESS, Valetta, Malta, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010712500003058Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Aras Bozkurt and Gürhan Durak. 2018. A Systematic Review of Gamification Research. International Journal of Game-Based Learning 8, 3 (2018), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018070102Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachel C. Callan, Kristina N. Bauer, and Richard N. Landers. 2015. How to Avoid the Dark Side of Gamification: Ten Business Scenarios and Their Unintended Consequences. In Gamification in Education and Business, Torsten Reiners and Lincoln C. Wood (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_28Google Scholar
- Steve Dale. 2014. Gamification: Making work fun, or making fun of work?Business Information Review 31, 2 (2014), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114538350Google Scholar
- Robin de Croon, Jonas Geuens, Katrien Verbert, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2021. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Gamification on Adherence Across Disciplines. In Experience design and game mechanics, Xiaowen Fang (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12789. Springer, Cham, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77277-2_14Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hojjat Dehghanzadeh, Hashem Fardanesh, Javad Hatami, Ebrahim Talaee, and Omid Noroozi. 2021. Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning 34, 7 (2021), 934–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sebastian Deterding. 2015. The Lens of Intrinsic Skill Atoms: A Method for Gameful Design. Human–Computer Interaction 30, 3-4 (2015), 294–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.993471Google Scholar
- Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". MindTrek 2011(2011), 9–15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.March 2020. Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. https://doi.org/10.31030/3104744Google Scholar
- Benjamin D. Douglas and Markus Brauer. 2021. Gamification to prevent climate change: a review of games and apps for sustainability. Current opinion in psychology 42 (2021), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.008Google Scholar
- Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Hawaii, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & Computer 2003 (2003), 187–196.Google Scholar
- Chia-Chien Hsu and Brian A. Sandford. 2007. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 2007, 12(2007), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90Google Scholar
- Aaron Chia Yuan Hung. 2017. A Critique and Defense of Gamification. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 2017, 15 (2017), 57–72. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/15.1.4.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Citeseer, Pennsylvania, US. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.117.471Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Aline Nunes Ogawa, Isabela Gasparini, and Marcelo Soares Pimenta. 2018. Does gamification matter?. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing(ACM Conferences), Hisham M. Haddad (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, 2006–2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167347Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cathie Marache-Francisco and Eric Brangier. 2013. Process of Gamification: From The Consideration of Gamification To Its Practical Implementation. The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services 2013 (2013), 126–131.Google Scholar
- Alberto Mora, Daniel Riera, Carina González, and Joan Arnedo-Moreno. 2017. Gamification: a systematic review of design frameworks. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 29, 3 (2017), 516–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9150-4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benedikt Morschheuser, Juho Hamari, Karl Werder, and Julian Abe. 2017. How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. UHM, Hawaii, USA. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/d0812d74-4dd7-49e5-be6b-3fbd48262123Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Rauschenberger, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Luz Rello. 2021. A Universal Screening Tool for Dyslexia by a Web-Game and Machine Learning.Frontiers Comput. Sci. 3(2021), 628634.Google Scholar
- Maria Rauschenberger, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2011. Benutzererlebnis bei Unternehmenssoftware: Ein Praxisbericht über die Umsetzung attraktiver Unternehmenssoftware. (Enterprise Software User Experience: A real-world report on how enterprise software can be made attractive.). In Usability Professionals Konferenz 2011, Vol. 1. German UPA e.V., Stuttgart, UPA, Stuttgart, 154—-158. https://issuu.com/germanupa/docs/usability-professionals-2011Google Scholar
- Maria Rauschenberger, Christian Lins, Noelle Rousselle, Andreas Hein, and Sebastian Fudickar. 2019. Designing a New Puzzle App to Target Dyslexia Screening in Pre-Readers. In Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (Valencia, Spain) (GoodTechs ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342428.3342679Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Rauschenberger, Andreas Willems, Menno Ternieden, and Jörg Thomaschewksi. 2019. Towards The Use Of Gamification Frameworks In Learning Environments. Jl. of Interactive Learning Research 2019, 30(2) (2019), 147–165.Google Scholar
- Fahrur Rozi, Yusep Rosmansyah, and Budiman Dabarsyah. 2019. A Systematic Literature Review on Adaptive Gamification: Components, Methods, and Frameworks. International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI) 2019(2019), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI47359.2019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Schrepp and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2019. Design and Validation of a Framework for the Creation of User Experience Questionnaires. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 5, 7 (2019), 88. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.06.006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie Seaborn and Deborah I. Fels. 2015. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006Google ScholarDigital Library
- Annique Smith, Nikoletta-Zampeta Legaki, and Juho Hamari. 2022. Games and gamification in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. 6th International GamiFIN Conference 2022 (2022), 33–43.Google Scholar
- Nadja Zaric and Snezana Scepanovic. 2018. Gamification of e-learning based on learning styles –design model and implementation. E-Learn 2018(2018).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Maybe We Don’t Need a New Gamification Framework After All
Recommendations
Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
HICSS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesThis paper reviews peer-reviewed empirical studies on gamification. We create a framework for examining the effects of gamification by drawing from the definitions of gamification and the discussion on motivational affordances. The literature review ...
The need to achieve
Microsoft's Xbox and Sony's PlayStation overlay achievement and trophy systems onto their video games. Though these meta-game reward systems are growing in popularity, little research has examined whether players notice, use, or seek out these systems. ...
Gamification, Serious Games, Ludic Simulation, and other Contentious Categories
This paper provides a conceptual framework for gamification, ludic simulations, and serious games. Central to this framework is the spectrum of design that differentiates work and play. Work and play help define software in purpose as games, ...
Comments