skip to main content
10.1145/3505711.3505735acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicaaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Simple and Effective Sound-based Five-Class Classifier for Induction Motor Overload

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Overloading can shorten operating life of induction motors. It is also a primary cause of some faults, such as excessive temperatures or tooth breakage. Detecting and classifying overload levels are very essential to ensure durable and stable operations of those electromechanical energy converters. In our research, sounds recorded by a single microphone is analyzed to categorize five levels of overload status. Three acoustic features and six classification models are evaluated. Acquired results show that this is a promising way to build a real-time and inexpensive monitoring system for induction motor overload.

References

  1. Hasmat Malik, Atif Iqbal, and Amit K. Yadav. 2020. Soft Computing in Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Electrical and Mechanical Systems. Springer Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubravko Miljković. Brief review of motor current signature analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304094187_Brief_Review_of_Motor_Current_Signature_Analysis, last accessed 2020/08/07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lamiaâ El Menzhi and Saad Abdallah. 2009. Induction motor fault diagnosis using voltage Park components of an auxiliary winding-voltage unbalance. In Proceedings of ICEMS 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Julio-César Urresty, Jordi-Roger Riba, Miguel Delgado, and Luís Romeral. 2012. Detection of demagnetization faults in surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous motors by means of the zero-sequence voltage component. IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 27(1), 42–51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sérgio M. A. Cruz and Antonio J. M. Cardoso. 2006. Diagnosis of rotor faults in closed-loop induction motor drives. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Application Society Annual Meeting, Tampa, FL, United States, CD-Rom, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sérgio M. A. Cruz, Andrea Stefani, Fiorenzo Filippetti, and Antonio J. M. Cardoso. 2008. Diagnosis of rotor faults in traction drives for railway applications. In Proceedings of the 18th Int. Conf. on Electrical Machines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Seungdeog Choi, Bilal Akin, Mina M. Rahimian, and HamidA. Toliyat. 2012. Performance-oriented electric motors diagnotics in modern energy conversion systems. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59(2), 1266–1277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. David G. Dorrell, D.G., William T. Thomson, and Steven Roach. 1997. Analysis of airgap flux, current, and vibration signals as a function of the combination of static and dynamic airgap eccentricity in 3-phase induction motors. IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, vol. 33(1).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. J. Ellison and S. J. Yang. 1971. Effects of rotor eccentricity on acoustic noise from induction machines. In Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers. Vol. 118. No. 1. IET Digital Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Naim Baydar and Andrew Ball. 2001. A comparative study of acoustic and vibration signals in detection of gear failures using Wigner–Ville distribution. In Mechanical systems and signal processing. 2001;15(6), 1091–1107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Patricia Scanlon, Darren F. Kavanagh, and Francis M. Boland. 2013. Residual Life Prediction of Rotating Machines Using Acoustic Noise Signals. IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 62(1), 95–108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Humberto Henao, Shahin H. Kia, and Gérard-André Capolino. 2011. Torsional-vibration assessment and gear-fault diagnosis in railway traction system. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vo. 58(5), 1707–1717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Peyman Milanfar and Jeffrey H. Lang. 1996. Monitoring the thermal condition of permanent-magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 32(4), 1421–1429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Peter J. Tavner. 2008. Review of condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines. Electric Power Applications, IET, vol. 2(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohammad S. Laghari, Faheem Ahmed, and Junaid Aziz. 2010. Wear particle shape and edge detail analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Computer and Automation Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Arturo Garcia-Perez, René J. Romero-Troncoso, Eduardo Cabal-Yepez, Roque Osornio-Rios, and Jose A. Lucio-Martinez. 2012. Application of high-resolution spectral analysis for identifying faults in induction motors by means of sound. J. Vib. Control. 18 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maciej Orman and Cajetan Pinto. 2013. Acoustic analysis of electric motors in noisy industrial environment. In Proceedings of the 12th IMEKO TC10 Workshop on Technical Diagnostics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yumi Ono, Yoshifumi Onishi, Takafumi Koshinaka, Soichiro Takata, and Osamu Hoshuyama, O.: 2013. Anomaly detection of motors with feature emphasis using only normal sounds. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 2800–2804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Huseyin Akcay and Emin Germen. 2013. Identification of acoustic spectra for fault detection in induction motors. In 2013 Africon, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Adam Glowacz. 2014. Diagnostics of DC and induction motors based on the analysis of acoustic signals. Measurement Science Review, vol. 14, 257–262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Emin Germen, Murat Başaran, and Mehmet Fidan. 2014. Sound based induction motor fault diagnosis using Kohonen self-organizing map. J Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 46, 45–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Dong-Jin Choi, Ji-Hoon Han, Sang-Uk Park, and Sun-Ki Hong. 2019. Diagnosis of electric motor using acoustic noise based on CNN. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Michael J. Carey, Eluned S. Parris, and Harvey Lloyd – Thomas. 1999. A comparison of features for speech, music discrimination. In Proceedings of ICASSP’99, 149–152 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Iain McCowan, Daniel Gatica-Perez, Samy Bengio, Guillaume Lathoud, Mark Barnard, and Dong Zhang. 2005. Automatic analysis of multimodal group actions in meetings. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 3, 305–317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ian Jolliffe. 1986. Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Christopher M. Bishop. 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman, Richard A. Olshen, and Charles J. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Roger J. Jang. 1993. ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 23(3), 665–685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Geoffrey McLachlan and David Peel. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Eric Scheirer and Malcolm Slaney. 1997. Construction and evaluation of a robust multifeature music/speech discriminator. In Proceedings of ICASSP' 97, vol. II, 1331–1334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Vladimir N. Vapnik. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, N.Y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Simple and Effective Sound-based Five-Class Classifier for Induction Motor Overload
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICAAI '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence
            November 2021
            199 pages
            ISBN:9781450390699
            DOI:10.1145/3505711

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 March 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format