Antonette Shibani
Simon Buckingham Shum
- G. Siemens, and P. Long, “Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education,” EDUCAUSE review, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 30, 2011.Google Scholar
- S. Dawson, S. Joksimovic, O. Poquet, and G. Siemens, “Increasing the Impact of Learning Analytics,” in Ninth International Conference of Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK19), Tempe, Arizona, 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. P. Macfadyen, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, and D. Gaševic, “Embracing big data in complex educational systems: The learning analytics imperative and the policy challenge,” Research & Practice in Assessment, vol. 9, pp. 17-28, 2014.Google Scholar
- N. Selwyn, “What's the problem with learning analytics?,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 11–19-11–19, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Ochoa, S. Knight, and A. F. Wise, “Learning analytics impact: Critical conversations on relevance and social responsibility,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-5, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Knight, A. Gibson, and A. Shibani, “Implementing learning analytics for learning impact: Taking tools to task,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 45, pp. 100729, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Buckingham Shum, R. Ferguson, and R. Martinez-Maldonado, “Human-centred learning analytics,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Shibani, S. Knight, and S. B. Shum, “Educator perspectives on learning analytics in classroom practice,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 46, pp. 100730, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Bodily, and K. Verbert, “Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 405-418, 2017.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Kitto, M. Lupton, K. Davis, and Z. Waters, “Designing for student-facing learning analytics,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 152-168, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Verbert, E. Duval, J. Klerkx, S. Govaerts, and J. L. Santos, “Learning analytics dashboard applications,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1500-1509, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, M. Specht, and H. Drachsler, "License to evaluate: Preparing learning analytics dashboards for educational practice." pp. 31-40.Google Scholar
- P.-L. Tan, “Learner Dashboards a Double-Edged Sword? Students' Sense-Making of a Collaborative Critical Reading and Learning Analytics Environment for Fostering 21st-Century Literacies,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 117-140, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Holstein, and S. Doroudi, "Fairness and equity in learning analytics systems (FairLAK)." pp. 1-2.Google Scholar
- D. Shin, “The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 146, pp. 102551, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Knox, “Data power in education: Exploring critical awareness with the “Learning Analytics Report Card”,” Television & New Media, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 734-752, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Gitelman, Raw data is an oxymoron: MIT press, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Kitto, S. Buckingham Shum, and A. Gibson, "Embracing imperfection in learning analytics." pp. 451-460.Google Scholar
- D. Clow, “An overview of learning analytics,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 683-695, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Shibani, S. Knight, and S. Buckingham Shum, “Contextualizable Learning Analytics Design: A Generic Model, and Writing Analytics Evaluations,” in The 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’19), Tempe, Arizona, 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Goodyear, L. Carvalho, and P. Yeoman, “Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD): core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 445-464, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Lockyer, E. Heathcote, and S. Dawson, “Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1439-1459, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. P. Macfadyen, L. Lockyer, and B. Rienties, “Learning design and learning analytics: Snapshot 2020,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 6-12, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Gravett, “Feedback literacies as sociomaterial practice,” Critical Studies in Education, pp. 1-14, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Buckingham Shum, S. Knight, D. McNamara, L. Allen, D. Bektik, and S. Crossley, “Critical perspectives on writing analytics,” in Workshop at the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 2016, pp. 481-483.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Shibani, M. Liu, C. Rapp, and S. Knight, “Advances in Writing Analytics: Mapping the state of the field,” in Companion Proceedings 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), Tempe, Arizona, 2019.Google Scholar
- E. Cotos, “Automated Writing Analysis for writing pedagogy: From healthy tension to tangible prospects,” Writing and Pedagogy, vol. 6, pp. 1, 2015.Google Scholar
- S. Knight, A. Shibani, S. Abel, A. Gibson, P. Ryan, N. Sutton, R. White, C. Lucas, A. Sandor, K. Kitto, M. Liu, R. V. Mogarkar, and S. Buckingham Shum, “AcaWriter: A Learning Analytics Tool for Formative Feedback on Academic Writing,” Journal of Writing Research, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Shibani, S. Knight, S. Buckingham Shum, and P. Ryan, “Design and Implementation of a Pedagogic Intervention Using Writing Analytics,” in 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, New Zealand, 2017.Google Scholar
- A. Shibani, “Augmenting Pedagogic Writing Practice with Contextualizable Learning Analytics,” Connected Intelligence Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2019.Google Scholar
- S. Knight, A. Shibani, and S. Buckingham Shum, “Augmenting Formative Writing Assessment with Learning Analytics: A Design Abstraction Approach,” in 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, London, United Kingdom, 2018, pp. 1783-1790.Google Scholar
- D. Carless, and D. Boud, “The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1315-1325, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Sutton, “Conceptualizing feedback literacy: knowing, being, and acting,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 31-40, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Data literacy for learning analytics
LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & KnowledgeThis workshop explores how data literacy impacts on learning analytics both for practitioners and for end users. The term data literacy is used to broadly describe the set of abilities around the use of data as part of everyday thinking and reasoning ...
Writing analytics literacy: bridging from research to practice
LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge ConferenceThere is untapped potential in achieving the full impact of learning analytics through the integration of tools into practical pedagogic contexts. To meet this potential, more work must be conducted to support educators in developing learning analytics ...
A Scalable Learning Analytics Platform for Automated Writing Feedback
L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ ScaleIn this paper, we describe a scalable learning analytics platform which runs generalized analytics models on educational data in parallel. As a proof of concept, we use this platform as a base for an end-to-end automated writing feedback system. The ...
Comments