skip to main content
research-article

Leveraging Narrative to Generate Movie Script

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 March 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Generating a text based on a predefined guideline is an interesting but challenging problem. A series of studies have been carried out in recent years. In dialogue systems, researchers have explored driving a dialogue based on a plan, while in story generation, a storyline has also been proved to be useful. In this article, we address a new task—generating movie scripts based on a predefined narrative. As an early exploration, we study this problem in a “retrieval-based” setting. We propose a model (ScriptWriter-CPre) to select the best response (i.e., next script line) among the candidates that fit the context (i.e., previous script lines) as well as the given narrative. Our model can keep track of what in the narrative has been said and what is to be said. Besides, it can also predict which part of the narrative should be paid more attention to when selecting the next line of script. In our study, we find the narrative plays a different role than the context. Therefore, different mechanisms are designed for deal with them. Due to the unavailability of data for this new application, we construct a new large-scale data collection GraphMovie from a movie website where end-users can upload their narratives freely when watching a movie. This new dataset is made available publicly to facilitate other studies in text generation under the guideline. Experimental results on the dataset show that our proposed approach based on narratives significantly outperforms the baselines that simply use the narrative as a kind of context.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Claire Bonial, Tommaso Caselli, Snigdha Chaturvedi, Elizabeth Clark, Ruihong Huang, Mohit Iyyer, Alejandro Jaimes, Heng Ji, Lara J. Martin, Ben Miller, Teruko Mitamura, Nanyun Peng, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). 2020. In Proceedings of the First Joint Workshop on Narrative Understanding, Storylines, and Events, NUSE@ACL 2020, Online, July 9, 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Ba Lei Jimmy, Kiros Jamie Ryan, and Hinton Geoffrey E.. 2016. Layer normalization. arXiv:1607.06450. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Bringsjord Selmer and Ferrucci David. 1999. Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the Mind of Brutus, A Storytelling Machine. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Cavazza Marc, Charles Fred, and Mead Steven J.. 2002. Planning characters’ behaviour in interactive storytelling. Comput. Animat. Virt. Worlds 13, 2 (2002), 121131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Cho Woon Sang, Zhang Pengchuan, Zhang Yizhe, Li Xiujun, Galley Michel, Brockett Chris, Wang Mengdi, and Gao Jianfeng. 2019. Towards coherent and cohesive long-form text generation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Narrative Understanding. Association for Computational Linguistics, 111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Colby Kenneth Mark. 1975. Artificial Paranoia: A Computer Simulation of Paranoid Process. Pergamon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] DeLucia Alexandra, Mueller Aaron, Li Xiang Lisa, and Sedoc João. 2020. Decoding methods for neural narrative generation. arXiv:2010.07375. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Fan Angela, Lewis Mike, and Dauphin Yann N.. 2018. Hierarchical neural story generation. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’18), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 889898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Fan Angela, Lewis Mike, and Dauphin Yann N.. 2019. Strategies for structuring story generation. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 26502660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Feng Xiaocheng, Liu Ming, Liu Jiahao, Qin Bing, Sun Yibo, and Liu Ting. 2018. Topic-to-Essay generation with neural networks. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). 40784084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Gao Jianfeng, Galley Michel, and Li Lihong. 2018. Neural approaches to conversational AI. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’18). ACM, 13711374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Gervás Pablo, Díaz-Agudo Belén, Peinado Federico, and Hervás Raquel. 2005. Story plot generation based on CBR. Knowl. Bas. Syst. 18, 4–5 (2005), 235242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Ghazvininejad Marjan, Brockett Chris, Chang Ming-Wei, Dolan Bill, Gao Jianfeng, Yih Wen-tau, and Galley Michel. 2018. A knowledge-grounded neural conversation model. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI’18), the 30th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’18). AAAI Press, 51105117. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/16710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Gu Jia-Chen, Li Tianda, Liu Quan, Ling Zhen-Hua, Su Zhiming, Wei Si, and Zhu Xiaodan. 2020. Speaker-Aware BERT for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’20). ACM, 20412044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Gu Jia-Chen, Ling Zhen-Hua, and Liu Quan. 2019. Interactive matching network for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’19). ACM, 23212324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Guan Jian, Wang Yansen, and Huang Minlie. 2019. Story ending generation with incremental encoding and commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19), the 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI’19), and the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’19). AAAI Press, 64736480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] He Kaiming, Zhang Xiangyu, Ren Shaoqing, and Sun Jian. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’16). IEEE Computer Society, 770778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Henderson Matthew, Thomson Blaise, and Young Steve J.. 2014. Word-Based dialog state tracking with recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL’14). The Association for Computer Linguistics, 292299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Hu Baotian, Lu Zhengdong, Li Hang, and Chen Qingcai. 2014. Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 20422050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Jhamtani Harsh and Berg-Kirkpatrick Taylor. 2020. Narrative text generation with a latent discrete plan. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EMNLP’20). Association for Computational Linguistics, 36373650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Ji Zongcheng, Lu Zhengdong, and Li Hang. 2014. An information retrieval approach to short text conversation. arXiv:1408.6988. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.6988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Kiddon Chloé, Zettlemoyer Luke, and Choi Yejin. 2016. Globally coherent text generation with neural checklist models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’16). The Association for Computational Linguistics, 329339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Kim Byeongchang, Ahn Jaewoo, and Kim Gunhee. 2020. Sequential latent knowledge selection for knowledge-grounded dialogue. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Levin Esther, Narayanan Shrikanth S., Pieraccini Roberto, Biatov Konstantin, Bocchieri Enrico, Fabbrizio Giuseppe Di, Eckert Wieland, Lee Sungbok, Pokrovsky A., Rahim Mazin G., Ruscitti P., and Walker Marilyn A.. 2000. The AT&t-DARPA communicator mixed-initiative spoken dialog system. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP’00). ISCA, 122125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Li Jiwei, Galley Michel, Brockett Chris, Gao Jianfeng, and Dolan Bill. 2016. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT’16). The Association for Computational Linguistics, 110119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Li Jiwei, Galley Michel, Brockett Chris, Spithourakis Georgios P., Gao Jianfeng, and Dolan William B.. 2016. A persona-based neural conversation model. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’16), Volume 1: Long Papers. The Association for Computer Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Lian Rongzhong, Xie Min, Wang Fan, Peng Jinhua, and Wu Hua. 2019. Learning to select knowledge for response generation in dialog systems. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19). 50815087. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Lowe Ryan, Pow Nissan, Serban Iulian, and Pineau Joelle. 2015. The Ubuntu dialogue corpus: A large dataset for research in unstructured multi-turn dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL’15). The Association for Computer Linguistics, 285294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Ma Zhengyi, Dou Zhicheng, Zhu Yutao, Zhong Hanxun, and Wen Ji-Rong. 2021. One chatbot per person: Creating personalized chatbots based on implicit user profiles. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’21). ACM, 555564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Meehan James R.. 1977. TALE-SPIN, an interactive program that writes stories. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. William Kaufmann, 9198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Mikolov Tomás, Chen Kai, Corrado Greg, and Dean Jeffrey. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’13). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Peng Nanyun, Ghazvininejad Marjan, May Jonathan, and Knight Kevin. 2018. Towards controllable story generation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Storytelling. Association for Computational Linguistics, 4349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Qian Hongjin, Dou Zhicheng, Zhu Yutao, Ma Yueyuan, and Wen Ji-Rong. 2021. Learning implicit user profile for personalized retrieval-based chatbot. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’21). ACM, New York, NY, 14671477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Qian Qiao, Huang Minlie, Zhao Haizhou, Xu Jingfang, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2018. Assigning personality/profile to a chatting machine for coherent conversation generation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). 42794285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Rapaport William J., Segal Erwin M., Shapiro Stuart C., Zubin David A., Bruder Gail A., Duchan Judith Felson, and Mark David M.. 1989. Cognitive and computer systems for understanding narrative text.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Riedl Mark O. and Young Robert Michael. 2010. Narrative planning: Balancing plot and character. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 39 (2010), 217268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Ritter Alan, Cherry Colin, and Dolan William B.. 2011. Data-Driven response generation in social media. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’11). ACL, 583593. https://aclanthology.org/D11-1054/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Roemmele Melissa. 2019. Identifying sensible lexical relations in generated stories. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Narrative Understanding. Association for Computational Linguistics, 4452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Seneff Stephanie, Hurley Edward, Lau Raymond, Pao Christine, Schmid Philipp, and Zue Victor. 1998. GALAXY-II: A reference architecture for conversational system development. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Incorporating the 7th Australian International Speech Science and Technology Conference. ISCA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Serban Iulian Vlad, Sordoni Alessandro, Bengio Yoshua, Courville Aaron C., and Pineau Joelle. 2016. Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models. In Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 37763784.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Serban Iulian Vlad, Sordoni Alessandro, Lowe Ryan, Charlin Laurent, Pineau Joelle, Courville Aaron C., and Bengio Yoshua. 2017. A hierarchical latent variable encoder-decoder model for generating dialogues. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 32953301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Shang Lifeng, Lu Zhengdong, and Li Hang. 2015. Neural responding machine for short-text conversation. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (ACL’15), Volume 1: Long Papers. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 15771586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Tang Jianheng, Zhao Tiancheng, Xiong Chenyan, Liang Xiaodan, Xing Eric P., and Hu Zhiting. 2019. Target-Guided open-domain conversation. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2019), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 56245634. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Tao Chongyang, Wu Wei, Xu Can, Hu Wenpeng, Zhao Dongyan, and Yan Rui. 2019. One time of interaction may not be enough: Go deep with an interaction-over-interaction network for response selection in dialogues. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Zhiliang Tian, Rui Yan, Lili Mou, Yiping Song, Yansong Feng, and Dongyan Zhao. 2017. How to make context more useful? An empirical study on context-aware neural conversational models. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’17), Volume 2: Short Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 231–236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Tur Gokhan and Mori Renato De. 2011. Spoken Language Understanding: Systems for Extracting Semantic Information from Speech. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Turing Alan M.. 1990. Computing machinery and intelligence. In The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 4066.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Turner Scott R.. 1994. MINSTREL: A computer model of creativity and storytelling.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Lukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 59986008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Vinyals Oriol and Le Quoc V.. 2015. A neural conversational model. arXiv:1506.05869. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05869.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. [52] Voorhees Ellen M.. 1999. The TREC-8 question answering track report. In Proceedings of the 8th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’99),NIST Special Publication, Vol. 500-246. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Wan Shengxian, Lan Yanyan, Guo Jiafeng, Xu Jun, Pang Liang, and Cheng Xueqi. 2016. A deep architecture for semantic matching with multiple positional sentence representations. In Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 28352841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Wang Yeyi, Deng Li, and Acero Alex. 2011. Semantic frame-based spoken language understanding. Spoken Language Understanding: Systems for Extracting Semantic Information from Speech (2011), 4191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Weizenbaum Joseph. 1966. ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM 9, 1 (1966), 3645. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Taesun Whang, Dongyub Lee, Dongsuk Oh, Chanhee Lee, Kijong Han, Dong-hun Lee, and Saebyeok Lee. 2021. Do response selection models really know what’s next? Utterance manipulation strategies for multi-turn response selection. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021. AAAI Press, 14041–14049. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/17653Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] Williams Jason D. and Young Steve J.. 2007. Partially observable Markov decision processes for spoken dialog systems. Comput. Speech Lang. 21, 2 (2007), 393422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Wu Chao-Chung, Song Ruihua, Sakai Tetsuya, Cheng Wen-Feng, Xie Xing, and Lin Shou-De. 2019. Evaluating image-inspired poetry generation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC’19) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11838). Springer, 539551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. [59] Wu Wenquan, Guo Zhen, Zhou Xiangyang, Wu Hua, Zhang Xiyuan, Lian Rongzhong, and Wang Haifeng. 2019. Proactive human-machine conversation with explicit conversation goal. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 37943804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Wu Yu, Wu Wei, Xing Chen, Zhou Ming, and Li Zhoujun. 2017. Sequential matching network: A new architecture for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’17), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 496505. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Wu Yu, Wu Wei, Yang Dejian, Xu Can, and Li Zhoujun. 2018. Neural response generation with dynamic vocabularies. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), the 30th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’18). AAAI Press, 55945601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. [62] Xing Chen, Wu Wei, Wu Yu, Liu Jie, Huang Yalou, Zhou Ming, and Ma Wei-Ying. 2017. Topic aware neural response generation. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 33513357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. [63] Xing Chen, Wu Yu, Wu Wei, Huang Yalou, and Zhou Ming. 2018. Hierarchical recurrent attention network for response generation. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), the 30th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’18). AAAI Press, 56105617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Xu Wei and Rudnicky Alexander I.. 2000. Task-based dialog management using an agenda. In ANLP-NAACL 2000 Workshop: Conversational Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Pérez Rafael Pérez y and Sharples Mike. 2001. MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 13, 2 (2001), 119139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Yan Rui, Song Yiping, and Wu Hua. 2016. Learning to respond with deep neural networks for retrieval-based human-computer conversation system. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’16). ACM, 5564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Yao Lili, Peng Nanyun, Weischedel Ralph M., Knight Kevin, Zhao Dongyan, and Yan Rui. 2019. Plan-and-Write: Towards better automatic storytelling. In Proceedings of the 32rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2019), the 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI’19), the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI’19). AAAI Press, 73787385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. [68] You Keen and Goldwasser Dan. 2020. “where is this relationship going?”: Understanding relationship trajectories in narrative text. In Proceedings of the 9th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM@COLING’20). Association for Computational Linguistics, 168178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. [69] Yuan Chunyuan, Zhou Wei, Li Mingming, Lv Shangwen, Zhu Fuqing, Han Jizhong, and Hu Songlin. 2019. Multi-hop selector network for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP’19). Association for Computational Linguistics, 111120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Zhang Zhuosheng, Li Jiangtong, Zhu Pengfei, Zhao Hai, and Liu Gongshen. 2018. Modeling multi-turn conversation with deep utterance aggregation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’18). Association for Computational Linguistics, 37403752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. [71] Zhou Hao, Young Tom, Huang Minlie, Zhao Haizhou, Xu Jingfang, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2018. Commonsense knowledge aware conversation generation with graph attention. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). 46234629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. [72] Zhou Xiangyang, Li Lu, Dong Daxiang, Liu Yi, Chen Ying, Zhao Wayne Xin, Yu Dianhai, and Wu Hua. 2018. Multi-Turn response selection for chatbots with deep attention matching network. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’18), Volume 1: Long Papers. Association for Computational Linguistics, 11181127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Zhu Yutao, Dou Zhicheng, Nie Jian-Yun, and Wen Ji-Rong. 2020. ReBoost: A retrieval-boosted sequence-to-sequence model for neural response generation. Inf. Retr. J. 23, 1 (2020), 2748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. [74] Zhu Yutao, Nie Jian-Yun, Zhou Kun, Du Pan, and Dou Zhicheng. 2021. Content selection network for document-grounded retrieval-based chatbots. In Advances in Information Retrieval: Proceedings of the 43rd European Conference on IR Research (ECIR’21), Part ILecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12656. Springer, 755769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Zhu Yutao, Nie Jian-Yun, Zhou Kun, Du Pan, Jiang Hao, and Dou Zhicheng. 2021. Proactive retrieval-based chatbots based on relevant knowledge and goals. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’21). ACM, 20002004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. [76] Zhu Yutao, Song Ruihua, Dou Zhicheng, Nie Jian-Yun, and Zhou Jin. 2020. ScriptWriter: Narrative-Guided script generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’20). Association for Computational Linguistics, 86478657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging Narrative to Generate Movie Script

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 40, Issue 4
      October 2022
      812 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3501285
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 March 2022
      • Online AM: 1 February 2022
      • Accepted: 1 December 2021
      • Revised: 1 November 2021
      • Received: 1 April 2021
      Published in tois Volume 40, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format