skip to main content
10.1145/3507485.3507500acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsebConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Effect of Management Accounting Information Systems and Decision Making on Managerial Performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This purpose of this study is find empirically The effect of management accounting information systems and decision making on managerial performance. The research method used is quantitative research methods with primary data obtained from questionnaire data which is measured using a likert scale. The result found that management accounting information system and decision making influence managerial performance. The results showed that the smaller the management accounting information system and decision making owned by the company, the smaller the percentage of managerial performance carried out in the company. The higher the management accounting information system, the higher the company's managerial performance.

References

  1. Abdul, Hakim. 2010. Descriptive Statistics. Yogyakarta: EconesiaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H. 2009. Performance Management. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aida Ainul Mardiyah and Gudono, 2001. The Effect of Environmental Uncertainty and Decentralization on the Characteristics of Management Accounting Information Systems. Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 4 No. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baridwan, Zaki. 2015. Intermediate Accounting. Eighth Edition. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Basyar, C. and Khanifah. 2008. The Influence of Management Accounting Information Systems on Managerial Performance, With Decentralization as a Moderate Variable: (Case Study on Manufacturing Companies in Semarang Port Industrial Estate). Journal of Economics and Business 3:136-147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chenhall, Robert H, and D. Morris. 1986. The Impact Of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on The Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. The Accounting Review 1:16-35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Drummond, Helga. 2003. Effective Decision Making, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Denziana, A. and Handayani, E. 2015. Effect of Effectiveness of Management Accounting Information on Management Decision Making. Journal of Accounting & Finance 6:151-176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Febriyanti, F. 2014. Management Accounting System Against Managerial Performance at PT. PLN (Persero) West Java. Thesis Pasundan University, Bandung.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Meiryani.,Olivia.,Sudrajat,J.,Daud,Z.M. 2020. The Effect of Firm's Size on Corporate Performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(5), pp. 272-277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, Don R. and Mowen, M. Mowen. 2009. Managerial Accounting, Book 1 Edition 8. Translation by Denny Arnos Kwary. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ratnawati Kurnia. (2010). "The Influence of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Performance with Paternalistic Culture and Organizational Commitment as Moderating Variables". Journal of Ultima Accounting. Vol. 2 No. 2 Pg 54-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rivai, V. and Basri. 2005. Performance Appraisal: The Right System for Assessing Employee Performance and Increasing Company Competitiveness. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Robbins, P. S. and Judge, A. T. 2012. Organizational Behavior. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sigilipu, S. 2013. The Effect of Application of Management Accounting Information and Performance Measurement System on Managerial Performance. EMBA Journal, 1:239-247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Siregar, Baldric, Suripto, Bambang, 2013. Management Accounting. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sugiyono. 2013. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabeta, BandungGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sugiyono. 2015. Educational Research Methods (Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches). CV Publisher. Alphabeta: BandungGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sugiyono. 2017. Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabeta, BandungGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sujarweni, V. W. 2015. Management Accounting. Press New Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Susanto,A.,Meiryani. 2019. System Development Method with The Prototype Method. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8 (7), pp.141-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Susanto,A.,Meiryani. The Importance of Risk Management in an Organizations. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(11), pp. 103-107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Syamsi, I. 2010. Decision Making and Information Systems, Second printing. Earth Literacy, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Warren, C.S. Reeve, J.M, and Fess, P. E. 2005. Introduction to Accounting, Book One Edition 21. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Winwin Yadiati, Nissa, Sugiono Paulus, Harry Suharman, Meiryani. 2019. The Role of Green Intellectual Capital and Organizational Reputation in Influencing Environmental Performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 9 (3), pp. 261-268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICSEB '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Software and e-Business
    December 2021
    153 pages
    ISBN:9781450385831
    DOI:10.1145/3507485

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format