skip to main content
10.1145/3507509.3507521acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccnsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mission-Oriented Networks Robustness Based on Cascade Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In network science, network connectivity is usually used to evaluate network performance, but this does not represent the services that network systems can provide. Therefore, the robustness of the mission when the network is damaged represents the service survivability of the network. This article introduces missions into the network system and constructs a mission-oriented network model. In this model, the execution of each mission requires resources. When resources are insufficient, the mission is completed by mutual communication and cooperation between nodes. Due to the damage of some nodes in the network system, the allocation of mission resources and the communication path will be changed. This may cause other nodes to fail due to congestion or overload. We build a cascading failure model to describe this process. This paper compares different attack strategies through simulation experiments, and it is found that node resources will play a critical role in robustness.

References

  1. Réka Albert, István Albert, and Gary L. Nakarado. 2004. Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. 69, 2 (feb 2004), 025103. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.025103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Réka Albert and Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. 74, 1 (jan 2002), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.47Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberto Azzolin, Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio, Francesco Cadini, and Enrico Zio. 2018. Electrical and topological drivers of the cascading failure dynamics in power transmission networks. 175 (jul 2018), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eric Bonabeau. 1995. Sandpile Dynamics on Random Graphs. 64, 1 (jan 1995), 327–328. https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.64.327Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Reuven Cohen, Keren Erez, Daniel ben Avraham, and Shlomo Havlin. 2001. Breakdown of the Internet under Intentional Attack. 86, 16 (apr 2001), 3682–3685. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.86.3682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sharanya Eswaran, Matthew Johnson, Archan Misra, and Thomas La Porta. 2009. Adaptive In-Network Processing for Bandwidth and Energy Constrained Mission-Oriented Multi-hop Wireless Networks. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02085-8_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mostafa Ghobaei-Arani, Alireza Souri, and Ali A. Rahmanian. 2019. Resource Management Approaches in Fog Computing: a Comprehensive Review. 18, 1 (sep 2019), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-019-09491-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Terrence J. Moore, Jin-Hee Cho, and Ing-Ray Chen. 2019. Network Adaptations Under Cascading Failures for Mission-Oriented Networks. 16, 3 (sep 2019), 1184–1198. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2019.2917934Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y Moreno, J. B Gómez, and A. F Pacheco. 2002. Instability of scale-free networks under node-breaking avalanches. 58, 4 (may 2002), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00442-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Adilson E. Motter and Ying-Cheng Lai. 2002. Cascade-based attacks on complex networks. 66, 6 (dec 2002), 065102. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.66.065102Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mark Newman. 2011. Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton University Press. https://www.ebook.de/de/product/16564567/mark_newman_structure_and_dynamics_of_networks.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Konstantinos Poularakis, Jaime Llorca, Antonia M. Tulino, Ian Taylor, and Leandros Tassiulas. 2019. Joint Service Placement and Request Routing in Multi-cell Mobile Edge Computing Networks. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/infocom.2019.8737385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Vaishali Rampurkar, Polgani Pentayya, Harivittal A. Mangalvedekar, and Faruk Kazi. 2016. Cascading Failure Analysis for Indian Power Grid. 7, 4 (jul 2016), 1951–1960. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2016.2530679Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosam Rowaihy, Matthew P. Johnson, Ou Liu, Amotz Bar-Noy, Theodore Brown, and Thomas La Porta. 2010. Sensor-mission assignment in wireless sensor networks. 6, 4 (jul 2010), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1777406.1777415Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. J. Watts. 2002. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. 99, 9 (apr 2002), 5766–5771. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082090499Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCNS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 11th International Conference on Communication and Network Security
    December 2021
    106 pages
    ISBN:9781450386425
    DOI:10.1145/3507509

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format