skip to main content
10.1145/3507548.3507606acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Digital Exhibition Design of Former Residence Memorial Hall based on IPOP Theory

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper takes visitor experience as the center to study the specific strategies to enhance the digital display effect of the former residence Memorial Hall, in order to deal with the plight of its digital display development lag. Based on the theory of IPOP, this paper makes an empirical study of Tsou Jung Memorial Hall through questionnaire survey and field observation, this paper discusses the differences of four kinds of audience on the digital display of the former residence Memorial Hall. There are significant differences and correlations among the four kinds of experiences dimensions among the audiences with different preference types. Through the analysis of their internal relations, this paper explores the application possibility of IPOP theory in the digital display experience of museums, it provides a general plan for the evaluation of demonstration effect and the standard of technology application.

References

  1. Kotler N. 1999. Delivering experience; Marketing the museum's full range of assets. Museum News, 78 (3): 30–39, 58–61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee L. 2014. Frank Oppenheimer's theories and practice on museum visitor experience. Southeast Culture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Falk, J. H. 2016. Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience. Left Coast Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pekarik A. J, Doering Z. D, & Karns D. A. 1999. Exploring satisfying experiences in museums. Curator the Museum Journal, 42(2), 152-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Doering Z. D. 1999. Strangers, guests, or clients? visitor experiences in museums. Curator the Museum Journal, 42(2), 74-87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Elliott P, & Loomis R. J. 1975. Studies of visitor behavior in museums and exhibitions: an annotated bibliography of sources primarily in the English language. Annotated Bibliographies, 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ali S. A. 2019. Exploring visitors' participation in museums and galleries using aesthetic visual markers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schreiber J. B, & Pekarik A. J. 2014. Technical note: using latent class analysis versus k-means or hierarchical clustering to understand museum visitors. Curator the Museum Journal, 57(1), 45-59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pekarik A. J, Schreiber J. B, Hanemann N, Richmond K, & Mogel B. 2014. IPOP: a theory of experience preference. Curator: The Museum Journal, 57(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Z, Yang XB, Guo LR, & Cao HL. 2017. Design of interactive virtual museum roaming system based on point cloud and 3D model. Research and Exploration in Laboratory (5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Qu YP, Ren P, Yu WB, & Hu H. 2019. The Research on The Application of Display Technology Online and Offline in Museums. Journal of Natural Science Museum Research, 4(01), 5-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiao ZY, Li XH. 2021. Interaction Design in the Application of the Art Museum Display. Design, 4(01), 5-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar J, Nielsen J, & Yammiyavar P. 2007. Tracing Cognitive Processes for Usability Evaluation: A Cross Cultural Mind Tape Study. International Conference on Usability & Internationalization. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bewick V, Cheek L, & Ball J. 2004. Statistics review 9: one-way analysis of variance. Critical Care, 8(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zyda M. 2005. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38(9), 25-32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Research on Digital Exhibition Design of Former Residence Memorial Hall based on IPOP Theory
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
      December 2021
      437 pages
      ISBN:9781450384155
      DOI:10.1145/3507548

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 March 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format