skip to main content
research-article

Do You Hear What I Hear: The Balancing Act of Designing an Electronic Hockey Puck for Playing Hockey Non-Visually

Published:04 March 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Blind hockey is a sport that is gaining popularity in the United States after having an international presence for years. In blind hockey, a modified puck is used that emits sounds via ball bearings that rattle inside the puck when it is moving. The modified puck’s lifetime is minimal due to its lack of durability, and it does not provide feedback when the puck stops moving. This article presents an evaluation of multiple prototypes that investigate the appropriate acoustic profiles for an electronic version of a puck that has the ability to overcome some of these challenges. Our approach leverages the use of alternative 3D printable materials and the implementation of four distinct sound profiles: the league-standard puck in blind hockey, a 3.5kHz piezo buzzer, an 800Hz sine tone, and simulated white noise. We present the design and prototype of the pucks, along with benchtop and user validation tests of the prototypes, comparing them to the league standard puck with a focus on acoustic performance. Participants rated the white noise sound profile highest in pleasantness and loudness and the LSP highest in localization. The white noise sound profile was associated with lower angle and distance errors. Of the prototypes produced, the white noise prototype puck appeared to demonstrate the most promise for playing hockey non-visually. We close with a discussion of recommendations for future electronic hockey puck designs to support blind hockey moving forward.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] El Paso Mooses. 2020. Sonic Hockey Club El Paso, Texas. https://www.blindhockeymooses.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Afshar Pouya Farokhnezhad, Bahramnezhad Fatemeh, Asgari Parvaneh, and Shiri Mahmoud. 2016. Effect of white noise on sleep in patients admitted to a coronary care. Journal of Caring Sciences 5, 2 (2016), 103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Aguerrevere Daniel, Choudhury Maroof, and Barreto Armando. 2004. Portable 3D sound/sonar navigation system for blind individuals. In 2nd LACCEI International Latin American Caribbean Conference on Engineering Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Ahveninen Jyrki, Kopčo Norbert, and Jääskeläinen Iiro P.. 2014. Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans. Hearing Research 307 (2014), 8697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Zayer Majed Al, Tregillus Sam, Bhandari Jiwan, Feil-Seifer Dave, and Folmer Eelke. 2016. Exploring the use of a drone to guide blind runners. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 263264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Asakawa Chieko, Takagi Hironobu, Ino Shuichi, and Ifukube Tohru. 2003. Maximum listening speeds for the blind. Georgia Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Bragg Danielle, Bennett Cynthia, Reinecke Katharina, and Ladner Richard. 2018. A large inclusive study of human listening rates. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Brown David J. and Proulx Michael J.. 2016. Audio–vision substitution for blind individuals: Addressing human information processing capacity limitations. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10, 5 (2016), 924931.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Columna Luis, Dillon Suzanna Rocco, Dolphin Michelle, Streete Denzil A., Hodge Samuel R., Myers Beth, Norris Michael L., McCabe Lindsay, Barreira Tiago V., and Heffernan Kevin S.. 2019. Physical activity participation among families of children with visual impairments and blindness. Disability and Rehabilitation 41, 3 (2019), 357365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Cooper Triston B.. 2020. Hockey for the Blind: An Analysis of Auditory Profiles and Their Implementation. Ph. D. Dissertation. Saint Louis University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Dakopoulos Dimitrios and Bourbakis Nikolaos G.. 2009. Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids for blind: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 40, 1 (2009), 2535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Ding Qicheng, Gong Jiangtao, Sun Jingwei, Xu Penghui, Zhang Liuxin, Wang Qianying, and Zhang Yu. 2019. HeliCoach: A drone-based system supporting orientation and mobility training for the visually impaired. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Dobreva Marina S., O’Neill William E., and Paige Gary D.. 2011. Influence of aging on human sound localization. Journal of Neurophysiology 105, 5 (2011), 24712486.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Dong Wenyong and Ding Hong. 2016. Full frequency de-noising method based on wavelet decomposition and noise-type detection. Neurocomputing 214 (2016), 902909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Folmer Eelke. 2015. Exploring the use of an aerial robot to guide blind runners. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing112 (2015), 37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Hakobyan Lilit, Lumsden Jo, O’Sullivan Dympna, and Bartlett Hannah. 2013. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Survey of Ophthalmology 58, 6 (2013), 513528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Halim Suharsono, Handafiah Finna, Aprilliyani Ria, and Udhiarto Arief. 2018. Electronic white cane with GPS radar-based concept as blind mobility enhancement without distance limitation. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1933. AIP Publishing, 040024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Hansen Colin H.. 2001. Fundamentals of acoustics. In Occupational Exposure to Noise: Evaluation, Prevention and Control. World Health Organization, 2352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Hub Andreas, Diepstraten Joachim, and Ertl Thomas. 2003. Design and development of an indoor navigation and object identification system for the blind. ACM Sigaccess Accessibility and Computing77–78 (2003), 147152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Ikeda Tomozumi, Araie Toshitake, Kakimoto Akira, Ninomiya Keiichi, and Ikeda Kazuhisa. 2018. Development of multimodal strategy board for improving competitiveness in goalball. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization 8, 4, Article 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Ji Zihao, Hu Weijian, Wang Ze, Yang Kailun, and Wang Kaiwei. 2021. Seeing through events: Real-time moving object sonification for visually impaired people using event-based camera. Sensors 21, 10 (2021), 3558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Kobayashi Makoto, Fukunaga Yoshiki, and Shimada Shigenobu. 2018. Basic study of blind football play-by-play system for visually impaired spectators using quasi-zenith satellites system. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 2327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Krause Jean C. and Panagiotopoulos Athina Panagos. 2019. Speaking clearly for older adults with normal hearing: The role of speaking rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62, 10 (2019), 38513859.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Kurakata Kenji, Mizunami Tazu, and Matsushita Kazuma. 2013. Sensory unpleasantness of high-frequency sounds. Acoustical Science and Technology 34 (2013), 2633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] League National Hockey. 2019. 2019 SAP NHL All-Star Skills results. https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-all-star-skills-competition-results-details-2019/c-303955558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Legault Jean-Benoit. 2019. Montreal researchers create audible hockey puck for visually impaired players. https://www.660citynews.com/2019/05/18/montreal-researchers-create-audible-hockey-puck-for-visually-impaired-players/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Magnusson Charlotte, Molina Miguel, Rassmus-Gröhn Kirsten, and Szymczak Delphine. 2010. Pointing for non-visual orientation and navigation. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM, 735738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Mahoney John. 2015. A Prototype of a Hockey Puck That Can Be Used Players Who Are Visually Impaired, Designed by a Team of Designers and Engineers from UQAM, Is 5.25 Inches in Diameter, Two Inches Thick and Weighs 400 Grams. https://montrealgazette.com/sports/hockey/eletronic-hockey-puck-being-developed-for-the-visually-impaired/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Massiceti Daniela, Hicks Stephen Lloyd, and Rheede Joram Jacob van. 2018. Stereosonic vision: Exploring visual-to-auditory sensory substitution mappings in an immersive virtual reality navigation paradigm. PloS One 13, 7 (2018), e0199389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] McCarthy Lisa and Olsen Kirk N.. 2017. A “looming bias” in spatial hearing? Effects of acoustic intensity and spectrum on categorical sound source localization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79, 1 (2017), 352362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] McQuigge Michelle. 2015. Ontario students design audible puck for visually impaired players. Canadian Press (Aug. 2015). https://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/ontario-students-design-audible-puck-for-visually-impaired-players/article25815828/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Meshram Vidula V., Patil Kailas, Meshram Vishal A., and Shu Felix Che. 2019. An astute assistive device for mobility and object recognition for visually impaired people. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Mio Kevin. 2015. UQAM researchers developing electronic hockey puck for the visually impaired. https://montrealgazette.com/sports/hockey/eletronic-hockey-puck-being-developed-for-the-visually-impaired/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Miura Takahiro, Soga Shimpei, Matsuo Masaki, Sakajiri Masatsugu, Onishi Junji, and Ono Tsukasa. 2018. GoalBaural: A training application for goalball-related aural sense. In Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference. 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Morrow Matt. 2019. The Official Home of Blind Ice Hockey. http://blindicehockey.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] A/S Odeon. 2018. Odeon room acoustics software, user manual, version 15. Lyngby, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Directors National Beep Ball Board of. 2019. The Official Site of the National Beep Baseball Association | NBBA.org Homepage. https://nbba.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Engineers. The American Society of Mechanical2015. ASME IAM3D: 3D Printing an Audible Hockey Puck. https://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/media/manufacturing-processing/video-iam3d-3d-printing-audible-hockey-puck.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Oxenham Andrew J.. 2018. How we hear: The perception and neural coding of sound. Annual Review of Psychology 69 (2018), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Presti Giorgio, Ahmetovic Dragan, Ducci Mattia, Bernareggi Cristian, Ludovico Luca A., Baratè Adriano, Avanzini Federico, and Mascetti Sergio. 2021. Iterative design of sonification techniques to support people with visual impairments in obstacle avoidance. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 14, 4 (2021), 127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Rector Kyle, Bartlett Rachel, and Mullan Sean. 2018. Exploring aural and haptic feedback for visually impaired people on a track: A wizard of Oz study. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 295306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Rodríguez Alberto, Yebes J. Javier, Alcantarilla Pablo F., Bergasa Luis M., Almazán Javier, and Cela Andrés. 2012. Assisting the visually impaired: Obstacle detection and warning system by acoustic feedback. Sensors 12, 12 (2012), 1747617496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Sato Hayato, Sato Hiroshi, Morimoto Masayuki, and Nakai Yusuke. 2016. Localization of intermittent sound with head movement: Basic study on optimum temporal characteristics of acoustic guide signals. Applied Acoustics 101 (2016), 5863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Schedlin Haley. 2012. The academic learning time in physical education of students with visual impairments: An analysis of two students. Insight 5, 1 (2012), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Sheth Rohit, Rajandekar Surabhi, Laddha Shalaka, and Chaudhari Rahul. 2014. Smart white cane—An elegant and economic walking aid. American Journal of Engineering Research 3, 10 (2014), 8489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Shifrer Dara, Pearson Jennifer, Muller Chandra, and Wilkinson Lindsey. 2015. College-going benefits of high school sports participation: Race and gender differences over three decades. Youth & Society 47, 3 (2015), 295318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Shoval Shraga, Borenstein Johann, and Koren Yoram. 1998. Auditory guidance with the Navbelt—A computerized travel aid for the blind. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 28, 3 (1998), 459467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Spencer J. A., Moran D. J., Lee A., and Talbert D.. 1990. White noise and sleep induction. Archives of Disease in Childhood 65, 1 (1990), 135137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Ulrich Iwan and Borenstein Johann. 2001. The GuideCane-applying mobile robot technologies to assist the visually impaired. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 31, 2 (2001), 131136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Vezeau Steve. 2019. La BIPeR Est Composee d’une Coquille Exterieure en Plastique Qui Absorbe Les Chocs. On Retrouve a l’interieur un Module Electronique Qui Contient un Circuit Imprime Muni de Differents Capteurs qui Permettent d’analyser le Comportement de la Rondelle.Canadian Press. https://www.660citynews.com/2019/05/18/montreal-researchers-create-audible-hockey-puck-for-visually-impaired-players/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Yost William A.. 2016. Sound source localization identification accuracy: Level and duration dependencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 1 (2016), EL14–EL19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Young Keith and Czechowski Jake. 2019. Goalball. https://www.usaba.org/sports/goalball/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] Zhivomirov Hristo. 2018. A method for colored noise generation. Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration 15, 1 (2018), 1419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do You Hear What I Hear: The Balancing Act of Designing an Electronic Hockey Puck for Playing Hockey Non-Visually

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
        ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 15, Issue 1
        March 2022
        213 pages
        ISSN:1936-7228
        EISSN:1936-7236
        DOI:10.1145/3514170
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 March 2022
        • Revised: 1 December 2021
        • Accepted: 1 December 2021
        • Received: 1 August 2021
        Published in taccess Volume 15, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format