skip to main content
10.1145/3508072.3508184acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Features the used of microwave quantum frequency standard on rubidium atoms – 87 in systems of time synchronization for space system communication

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main problems arising during the operation of satellite information systems during the transmission of large amounts of information are considered. It is noted how the disadvantages of the current design of the quantum frequency standard based on rubidium-87 atoms influence the operation of the information transmission system. It is noted that the greatest instabilities during long-term operation of the quantum frequency standard are introduced by processes associated with light shifts in the optical part. Frequency stability decreases, synchronization of time scales of various communication satellites deteriorates. This leads to an increase in the number of errors in the transmission of information. A solution is proposed to improve the metrological characteristics of the rubidium frequency standard. The results of experimental studies of the operation of a satellite information transmission system are presented.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. L. Vlasenko, V. Kulik, R. Kirichek and A. Koucheryavy, 2019.Development of Models and Methods for Using Heterogeneous Gateways in 5G/IMT- 2020 Network Infrastructure. Communications in Computer and Information Science 1141 CCIS, (September 2019), 636-645. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 030-36625-4_51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Volkov, A. Khakimov, A. Muthanna, A. Vladyko and A. Koucheryavy, 2017. Interaction of the IoT traffic generated by a smart city segment with SDN core network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 10372 LNCS, (September 2017), 115-126. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61382-6-10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Al-Bahri, A. Yankovsky, R. Kirichek and A. Borodin, 2019. Smart system based on DOA IoT for products monitoring anti-counterfeiting. In Proceedings of 4th MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City, ICBDSC 2019, 8645610 (February 2019). DOI: 10.1109/ICBDSC.2019.8645610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Al-Ansi, A.M. Al-Ansi, A. Muthanna, L. Elgendy and A. Koucheryavy, 2021. Survey on intelligence edge computing in 6G: Characteristics, challenges, potential use cases, and market drivers. Future Internet 13, 5 (May 2021), 118. DOI: 10.3390/fi13050118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Tavella and G. Petit, 2020. Precise time scales and navigation systems: mutual benefits of timekeeping and positioning. Satell Navig 1, (Novemder 2020), 10. DOI:10.1088/1681-7575/ab7185Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. N.A. Lukashev, 2019. Microwave frequency standard on Hg-199 ions for space stations and vehicles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1400, 2 (December 2019), 022050. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1400/2/022050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. Formichella, J. Camparo and P. Tavella, 2017. Influence of the ac-Stark shift on GPS atomic clock timekeeping. Applied Physics Letters 110, 4 (January 2017), 043506. DOI:10.1063/1.4975071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Fokin and V. Lazarev, 2019. 3D Location Accuracy Estimation of Radio Emission Sources for Beamforming in Ultra-Dense Radio Networks. International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops 2019, (October 2019), 8970939. DOI:10.1109/ICUMT48472.2019.8970939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Albahri, R. Kirichek, A. Ateya, A. Muthanna and A. Borodin, 2019. Combating Counterfeit for IoT System Based on DOA In Proceedings of International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, (January 2019), 8631257. DOI: 10.1109/ICUMT.2018.8631257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Abbas, K. Tawalbeh, L.A. Rafiq, A. Elgendy, A. Muthanna and A.A. Abd El-Latif, 2021. Convergence of Blockchain and IoT for Secure Transportation Systems in Smart Cities. Security and Communication Networks 2021, (May 2021), 5597679. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5597679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Volkov, A.R. Abdellah, A. Muthanna, A. Paramonov and A. Koucheryavy, 2020. IoT Traffic Prediction with Neural Networks Learning Based on SDN Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)12563 LNCS, (September 2020), 64–76. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-66471-8_10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Grebenikova, A. Moroz, M. Bylina and M. Kuzmin, 2019. Remote control of the quality and safety of the production of liquid products with using fiber-optic communication lines of the Internet. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 497, 1 (April 2019), 012109. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P.W. Khan, K. Abbas, K., H. Shaiba, A. Abuarqoub and M. Khayyat, 2020. Energy efficient computation offloading mechanism in multi-server mobile edge computing—an integer linear optimization approach. Electronics (Switzerland) 9, 6 (July 2020), 1–20. DOI:10.3390/electronics9061010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Petrov and D. Shapovalov, 2019. About the microwave excitation signal formation in the quantum frequency standard on cesium atoms-133. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1400, 4 (December 2019), 044008. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1400/4/044008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Hudson and J. Camparo, 2020. Quantum System Dynamics and the Quasistatic Approximation. Physical Review Applied 13, 6 (June 2020), 064007. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A.A. Petrov and N.M. Grebenikova, 2018. Some Directions of Quantum Frequency Standard Modernization for Telecommunication Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11118 LNCS, (September 2018), 641-648. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01168-0_58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A.A. Petrov and N.M. Grebenikova, 2018. On the Potential Application of Direct Digital Synthesis in the Development of Frequency Synthesizers for Quantum Frequency Standards. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics 63, 11 (November 2018), 1281-1285. DOI: 10.1134/S1064226918110086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Petrov, 2017. Rubidium atomic clock with improved metrological characteristics for satellite communication system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 10531 LNCS, (September 2017), 561-568. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67380-6_52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A.P. Valov, 2019. The method of improving the parameters of the microwave excitation signal in the rubidium - 87 quantum frequency standard. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1410, 1 (December 2019), 012246. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67380-6_52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A.S. Grevtseva and V.I. Dudkin, 2019. On the need to calculate the stability of the quantum frequency standard on the rubidium gas cell for navigation systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1326, 1 (December 2019), 012043. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1326/1/012043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. K.J. Smirnov, V.I. Medzakovskiy, M.G. Vysoczky and S.F. Glagolev, 2017. High sensitive InP emitter for InP/InGaAs heterostructures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 917, 6 (November 2017), 062019. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/917/6/062019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. K.J. Smirnov, S.F. Glagolev and G.V. Tushavin, 2018. High speed near-infrared range sensor based on InP/InGaAs heterostructures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1124, 2 (November 2018), 022014. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1124/2/022014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICFNDS '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
    December 2021
    847 pages
    ISBN:9781450387347
    DOI:10.1145/3508072

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format