skip to main content
10.1145/3508072.3508185acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modernization of the design of the cesium atom clock to improve synchronization of time scales of satellite communication channels

Published:13 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The necessity of constant modernization of quantum frequency standards (QFS) - atomic clocks, which are used in satellite navigation and telecommunication systems to solve new problems in the transmission rate of large amounts of information, etc. It is noted that among all atomic clocks, cesium QFS occupy a special place. These standards are the primary frequency reference on which the international time scale is based. The main goal of all upgrades of the QFS is to improve the metrological characteristics. In the case of its application on mobile objects, its dimensions, weight and energy consumption also become important characteristics. The article presents one of the options for reducing the influence of negative factors on the stability of the QFS. The development of a device for stabilizing the magnitude of the magnetic field at a given level in the QFS atomic-beam tube is proposed. Her work is modeled. A prototype has been made. The results of studies of the operation of the QFS with a new stabilizer of the magnetic field in the atomic-beam tube are presented. It is found that the short-term stability of the frequency of the output signal of the frequency standard is improved by 10%, which makes it possible to improve the synchronization of the time scales.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. V. Formichella, J. Camparo and P. Tavella, 2017. Influence of the ac-Stark shift on GPS atomic clock timekeeping. Applied Physics Letters 110, 4 (January 2017), 043506. DOI:10.1063/1.4975071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Lukashev, A. Petrov and N.  Grebenikova, 2018. Improving performance of quantum frequency standard with laser pumping. In Proceedings of International Conference Laser Optics 2018 (ICLO 2018), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 8435889. 271. DOI:10.1109/LO.2018.8435889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Hudson and J. Camparo, 2020. Quantum System Dynamics and the Quasistatic Approximation. Physical Review Applied 13, 6 (June 2020), 064007. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A.A. Petrov and N.M. Grebenikova, 2018. Some Directions of Quantum Frequency Standard Modernization for Telecommunication Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11118 LNCS, (September 2018), 641-648. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01168-0_58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Vlasenko, V. Kulik, R. Kirichek and A. Koucheryavy, 2019. Development of Models and Methods for Using Heterogeneous Gateways in 5G/IMT-2020 Network Infrastructure. Communications in Computer and Information Science 1141 CCIS, (September 2019), 636-645. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36625-4_51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Volkov, A. Khakimov, A. Muthanna, A. Vladyko and A. Koucheryavy, 2017. Interaction of the IoT traffic generated by a smart city segment with SDN core network. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 10372 LNCS, (September 2017), 115-126. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61382-6-10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Al-Bahri, A. Yankovsky, R. Kirichek and A. Borodin, 2019. Smart system based on DOA IoT for products monitoring anti-counterfeiting. In Proceedings of 4th MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City, ICBDSC 2019, 8645610 (February 2019). DOI: 10.1109/ICBDSC.2019.8645610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Fokin and V. Lazarev, 2019. 3D Location Accuracy Estimation of Radio Emission Sources for Beamforming in Ultra-Dense Radio Networks. International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops 2019, (October 2019), 8970939. DOI:10.1109/ICUMT48472.2019.8970939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Albahri, R. Kirichek, A. Ateya, A. Muthanna and A. Borodin, 2019. Combating Counterfeit for IoT System Based on DOA In Proceedings of International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, (January 2019), 8631257. DOI: 10.1109/ICUMT.2018.8631257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Grebenikova, A. Moroz, M. Bylina and M. Kuzmin, 2019. Remote control of the quality and safety of the production of liquid products with using fiber-optic communication lines of the Internet. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 497, 1 (April 2019), 012109. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A.V. Moroz and R.V. Davydov, 2019. A New Scheme for Transmitting Heterodyne Signals Based on a Fiber-Optical Transmission System for Receiving Antenna Devices of Radar Stations and Communication Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11660 LNCS, (September 2019) 710-718. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30859-9_62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N.A. Lukashev and A.V. Moroz, 2019. Compact microwave frequency standard on Hg-199 ions for navigation systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1236, 1 (July 2019), 012068. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1236/1/012068.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Al-Ansi, A.M. Al-Ansi, A. Muthanna, L. Elgendy and A. Koucheryavy, 2021. Survey on intelligence edge computing in 6G: Characteristics, challenges, potential use cases, and market drivers. Future Internet 13, 5 (May 2021), 118. DOI: 10.3390/fi13050118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. P. Tavella and G. Petit, 2020. Precise time scales and navigation systems: mutual benefits of timekeeping and positioning. Satell Navig 1, (November 2020), 10. DOI:10.1088/1681-7575/ab7185Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A.A. Petrov and N.M. Grebenikova, 2018. On the Potential Application of Direct Digital Synthesis in the Development of Frequency Synthesizers for Quantum Frequency Standards. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics 63, 11 (November 2018), 1281-1285. DOI: 10.1134/S1064226918110086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Petrov and D. Shapovalov, 2019. About the microwave excitation signal formation in the quantum frequency standard on cesium atoms-133. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1400, 4 (December 2019), 044008. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1400/4/044008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Petrov, 2017. Rubidium atomic clock with improved metrological characteristics for satellite communication system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 10531 LNCS, (September 2017), 561-568. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67380-6_52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A.P. Valov, 2019. The method of improving the parameters of the microwave excitation signal in the rubidium - 87 quantum frequency standard. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1410, 1 (December 2019), 012246. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67380-6_52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. N.A. Lukashev, 2019. Microwave frequency standard on Hg-199 ions for space stations and vehicles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1400, 2 (December 2019), 022050. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1400/2/022050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Grevtseva, 2020. Method of processing velocity increase of measuring results of quantum frequency standard parameters for information transfer velocity increase in satellite communication systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2667, (May 2020), 15–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A.S. Grevtseva and V.I. Dudkin, 2019. On the need to calculate the stability of the quantum frequency standard on the rubidium gas cell for navigation systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1326, 1 (December 2019), 012043. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1326/1/012043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Petrov, 2017. Digital frequency synthesizer for 133Cs-vapor atomic clock. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics 62, 3 (March 2017), 289–293. DOI: 10.1134/S1064226917030160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S.E. Logunov, R.V. Davydov, M.G. Vysotsky, V.I. Dudkin and V.Yu. Rud, 2019. Features of the construction of the registration scheme of optical images in an autonomous quantum magnetic field sensor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1368, 2 (December 2019), 022056. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1368/2/022056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S.E. Logunov, V.Y. Rud, R.V. Davydov, A.V. Moroz and K.J. Smirnov, 2019. Optical method for studying the magnetic field structure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1326, 1 (October 2019), 012024. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1326/1/012024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P.W. Khan, K. Abbas, K., H. Shaiba, A. Abuarqoub and M. Khayyat, 2020. Energy efficient computation offloading mechanism in multi-server mobile edge computing—an integer linear optimization approach. Electronics (Switzerland) 9, 6 (July 2020), 1–20. DOI:10.3390/electronics9061010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A.A. Petrov, N.M. Grebenikova, N.S. Rodygina and A.V. Moroz, 2018. Features of magnetic field stabilization in cesium atomic clock for satellite navigation system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1038, 1 (September 2018), 012032. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1038/1/012032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. N.A. Lukashev and A.P. Glinushkin, 2019. Improving characteristics of microwave frequency standard on Hg-199 ions for telecommunication systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1326, 1 (October 2019), 012046. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1326/1/012046.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICFNDS '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
    December 2021
    847 pages
    ISBN:9781450387347
    DOI:10.1145/3508072

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format