skip to main content
10.1145/3510309.3510313acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Use Machine Learning to Predict Primary School Students’ Level of Learning Engagement

Published: 14 March 2022 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Wong L. (2013). “Student engagement with online resources and its impact on learning outcomes”. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, (12):129-146.
[2]
Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., &Robin, B. R. (2016). “Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course”. Computers Education, (95):36-44.
[3]
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. &Wylie, C. (2012). The handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science, New York.
[4]
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). “Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (1):148-162.
[5]
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245):255-260.
[6]
Mushtaq, Hussain, Wenhao, Zhu, Wu, & Zhang, (2018). “Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores”. Computational Intelligence & Neuroscience, 1-22.
[7]
Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change the Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1):38-43.
[8]
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., Bakker, A. B. (2002). “The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach”. Journal of Happi-ness Studies, 3(1):71–92.
[9]
Hew, K. F. (2016). “Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCs”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2):320-341.
[10]
Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-wiggins, K. R., & Hmelo-silver, C. E. (2004). “Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment”. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3):273-307.
[11]
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris A. H. (2015). “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence”. Review of Educational Research, 74(1):59-109.
[12]
Kindermann T A. (1993). “Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school”. Developmental Psychology, 29:970-977.
[13]
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). “Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1):148-162.
[14]
Berman, N. B., & Artino, A. R. (2018). “Development and initial validation of an online engagement metric using virtual patients”. BMC Medical Education, 18(1).
[15]
Kop,R. (2011). “The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3):19-38 .
[16]
Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., & Margaryan, A. (2011). “Collective learning in the workplace: important knowledge sharing behaviors”. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 4(4): 26-31.
[17]
Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. University of Chicago Press.
[18]
Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). “The role of emotion in the learning process: comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings”. The Internet and Higher Education,15(3): 150-160.
[19]
J. H. Holland.(1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[20]
Hsu, C.W. and Lin, C.J. (2002). “A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines”. IEEE transactions on Neural Networks,13(2):415-425.
[21]
Hamid, S. S. A., Admodisastro, N., Manshor, N., Kamaruddin, A., & Abd Ghani, A. A. (2018). Dyslexia adaptive learning model: student engagement prediction using machine learning approach. International Conference on Soft Computing and Data Mining, Johor, Malaysia.
[22]
Rashidi, H. H., Tran, N. K., Betts, E. V., Howell, L. P., & Green, R. (2019). “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pathology: the present landscape of supervised methods”. Academic Pathology, (6): 1-17.
[23]
A, S. L., A, S. P. L., A, J. Z., B, H. W., & B, H. C. (2020). “Automated detection of cognitive engagement to inform the art of staying engaged in problem-solving”. Computers & Education,163.
[24]
F. C. Bonafini, C. Chae, E. Park, and K. W. Jablokow. (2017). “How much does student engagement with videos and forums in a MOOC affect their achievement?”. Online Learning, 21(4):223–240.
[25]
Sun, C. Y., &Rueda, R. (2012). “Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: their impact on student engagement in distance education”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2):191-204.
[26]
Yang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J. C. (2020). “The effects of scientific self-efficacy and cognitive anxiety on science engagement with the "question-observation-doing-explanation" model during school disruption in COVID-19 pandemic”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-14.
[27]
Allen, M., Titsworth, S. and Hunt, S.K. (2009). Quantitative Research in Communication. 1st. Edn. SAGE Publications. London. Sage.
[28]
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). “Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry”. The Internet and Higher Education, 14 (3):183-190.
[29]
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). “Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing”. Journal of Distance Education, 14: 50-71.
[30]
Samina K., Xu H., Muhammad S., Wang X., Muhammad Y., and Tamoor Khan.(2019) . "Prediction of Teacher Enrollment for Pakistani Schools by Using SVM," International Journal of Information and Education Technology,9(10):710-714.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Artificial Intelligence-Driven Instruction and Its Impact on Heutagogy and Student EngagementAI Algorithms and ChatGPT for Student Engagement in Online Learning10.4018/979-8-3693-4268-8.ch007(101-123)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating features that play a role in predicting gifted student engagement using machine learning: Video log and self-report dataEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12490-929:13(16317-16343)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Multisensory computer-based system for teaching sentence reading in Hindi and Bangla to children with dyslexiaTechnology and Disability10.3233/TAD-23000535:4(255-278)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2023

Index Terms

  1. Use Machine Learning to Predict Primary School Students’ Level of Learning Engagement
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICETM '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Education Technology Management
          December 2021
          323 pages
          ISBN:9781450385800
          DOI:10.1145/3510309
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 14 March 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Engagement
          2. Machine Learning
          3. Prediction
          4. SVM

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          ICETM'21

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
          Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Artificial Intelligence-Driven Instruction and Its Impact on Heutagogy and Student EngagementAI Algorithms and ChatGPT for Student Engagement in Online Learning10.4018/979-8-3693-4268-8.ch007(101-123)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
          • (2024)Investigating features that play a role in predicting gifted student engagement using machine learning: Video log and self-report dataEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12490-929:13(16317-16343)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
          • (2023)Multisensory computer-based system for teaching sentence reading in Hindi and Bangla to children with dyslexiaTechnology and Disability10.3233/TAD-23000535:4(255-278)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2023

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media