skip to main content
research-article

Deep Self-Supervised Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Reconstructing a high-resolution hyperspectral (HR-HS) image via merging a low-resolution hyperspectral (LR-HS) image and a high-resolution RGB (HR-RGB) image has become a hot research topic, and can greatly benefit for different subsequent high-level vision tasks. Recently, deep learning–based approaches have evolved for HS image reconstruction and validated impressive performance. However, to learn a good reconstruction model in the deep learning–based methods, it is mandatory to previously collect large-scale training triplets consisting of the LR-HS, HR-RGB, and HR-HS images, which is difficult to be collected in real applications. This study proposes a deep self-supervised HS image reconstruction framework (DSSH), which does not have to depend on any handcrafted prior and previously collected training triplets at all. The proposed DSSH method leverages the designed network architecture itself for capturing the prior of the underlying structure in the latent HR-HS image and employs the observed LR-HS and HR-RGB images only for network parameter learning. Experiments on two benchmark HS image datasets validated that the proposed DSSH method manifests very impressive reconstruction performance, and is even better than some state-of-the-art supervised learning approaches.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Akhtar Naveed, Shafait Faisal, and Mian Ajmal. 2014. Sparse spatio-spectral representation for hyperspectral image super-resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 6378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Akhtar Naveed, Shafait Faisal, and Mian Ajmal. 2015. Bayesian sparse representation for hyperspectral image super resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 36313640.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Akhtar Naveed, Shafait Faisal, and Mian Ajmal. 2016. Hierarchical beta process with Gaussian process prior for hyperspectral image super resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 103120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Barnes Michael, Pan Zhihong, and Zhang Sizhong. 2018. Systems and methods for hyperspectral medical imaging using real-time projection of spectral information. (Feb. 2018). US Patent No. 9,883,833. Filed May 13, 2009. Issued Feb. 6, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bioucas-Dias José M., Plaza Antonio, Camps-Valls Gustavo, Scheunders Paul, Nasrabadi Nasser, and Chanussot Jocelyn. 2013. Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 1, 2 (2013), 636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Bishop Charlotte A., Liu Jian Guo, and Mason Philippa J.. 2011. Hyperspectral remote sensing for mineral exploration in Pulang, Yunnan Province, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32, 9 (2011), 24092426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Chakrabarti Ayan and Zickler Todd. 2011. Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images. In CVPR 2011. IEEE, 193200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Dahlkamp Hendrik, Kaehler Adrian, Stavens David, Thrun Sebastian, and Bradski Gary R.. 2006. Self-supervised monocular road detection in desert terrain. In Robotics: Science and Systems, Vol. 38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Dian Renwei, Li Shutao, Guo Anjing, and Fang Leyuan. 2018. Deep hyperspectral image sharpening. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems99 (2018), 111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Dong Weisheng, Fu Fazuo, Shi Guangming, Cao Xun, Wu Jinjian, Li Guangyu, and Li Xin. 2016. Hyperspectral image super-resolution via non-negative structured sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 25, 5 (2016), 23372352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Fu Ying, Zhang Tao, Zheng Yinqiang, Zhang Debing, and Huang Hua. 2019. Hyperspectral image super-resolution with optimized RGB guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1166111670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Han Xian-Hua and Chen Yen-Wei. 2019. Deep residual network of spectral and spatial fusion for hyperspectral image super-resolution. In 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM’19). IEEE, 266270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Han Xian-Hua, Shi Boxin, and Zheng Yinqiang. 2018. Self-similarity constrained sparse representation for hyperspectral image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, 11 (2018), 56255637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Han Xian-Hua, Shi Boxin, and Zheng Yinqiang. 2018. SSF-CNN: Spatial and spectral fusion with CNN for hyperspectral image super-resolution. In 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’18). IEEE, 25062510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Han Xian-Hua, Sun YongQing, and Chen Yen-Wei. 2019. Residual component estimating CNN for image super-resolution. In 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM’19). IEEE, 443447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Han Xian-Hua, Zheng YinQiang, and Chen Yen-Wei. 2019. Multi-level and multi-scale spatial and spectral fusion CNN for hyperspectral image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] He Wei, Zhang Hongyan, Zhang Liangpei, and Shen Huanfeng. 2015. Total-variation-regularized low-rank matrix factorization for hyperspectral image restoration. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54, 1 (2015), 178188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] He Zhi, Liu Han, Wang Yiwen, and Hu Jie. 2017. Generative adversarial networks-based semi-supervised learning for hyperspectral image classification. Remote Sensing 9, 10 (2017), 1042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Imamura Ryuji, Itasaka Tatsuki, and Okuda Masahiro. 2019. Self-supervised hyperspectral image restoration using separable image prior. arXiv:1907.00651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Imamura Ryuji, Itasaka Tatsuki, and Okuda Masahiro. 2019. Zero-shot hyperspectral image denoising with separable image prior. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Kawakami Rei, Matsushita Yasuyuki, Wright John, Ben-Ezra Moshe, Tai Yu-Wing, and Ikeuchi Katsushi. 2011. High-resolution hyperspectral imaging via matrix factorization. In CVPR 2011. IEEE, 23292336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Kim Hyunsoo and Park Haesun. 2007. Sparse non-negative matrix factorizations via alternating non-negativity-constrained least squares for microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 23, 12 (2007), 14951502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Kwan Chiman, Choi Joon Hee, Chan Stanley, Zhou Jin, and Budavari Bence. 2017. Resolution enhancement for hyperspectral images: A super-resolution and fusion approach. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’17). IEEE, 61806184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Laben Craig A. and Brower Bernard V.. 2000. Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening. (Jan. 2000). US Patent 6,011,875. Filed Apr. 29, 1998. Issued Jan. 4, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Lanaras Charis, Baltsavias Emmanuel, and Schindler Konrad. 2015. Hyperspectral super-resolution by coupled spectral unmixing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 35863594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Li Yunsong, Hu Jing, Zhao Xi, Xie Weiying, and Li JiaoJiao. 2017. Hyperspectral image super-resolution using deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing 266 (2017), 2941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Liu Zhe, Zheng Yinqiang, and Han Xian-Hua. 2020. Unsupervised multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion with deep spatial and spectral priors. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Melgani Farid and Bruzzone Lorenzo. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42, 8 (2004), 17781790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Qu Ying, Qi Hairong, and Kwan Chiman. 2018. Unsupervised sparse Dirichlet-Net for hyperspectral image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 25112520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Sidorov Oleksii and Hardeberg Jon Yngve. 2019. Deep hyperspectral prior: Denoising, inpainting, super-resolution. arXiv:1902.00301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Sidorov Oleksii and Hardeberg Jon Yngve. 2019. Deep hyperspectral prior: Denoising, inpainting, super-resolution. CoRR abs/1902.00301 (2019). arXiv:1902.00301. http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Şımşek Murat and Polat Ediz. 2015. The effect of dictionary learning algorithms on super-resolution hyperspectral reconstruction. In 2015 XXV International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT’15). IEEE, 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Uezato Tatsumi, Hong Danfeng, Yokoya Naoto, and He Wei. 2020. Guided deep decoder: Unsupervised image pair fusion. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 87102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Ulyanov Dmitry, Vedaldi Andrea, and Lempitsky Victor. 2018. Deep image prior. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 94469454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Vo-Dinh Tuan. 2004. A hyperspectral imaging system for in vivo optical diagnostics. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 23, 5 (2004), 4049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Wang Lizhi, Sun Chen, Fu Ying, Kim Min H., and Huang Hua. 2019. Hyperspectral image reconstruction using a deep spatial-spectral prior. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 80328041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Wycoff Eliot, Chan Tsung-Han, Jia Kui, Ma Wing-Kin, and Ma Yi. 2013. A non-negative sparse promoting algorithm for high resolution hyperspectral imaging. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE, 14091413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Xie Qi, Zhou Minghao, Zhao Qian, Meng Deyu, Zuo Wangmeng, and Xu Zongben. 2019. Multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion by MS/HS fusion net. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 15851594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Xu Jun-Li, Riccioli Cecilia, and Sun Da-Wen. 2017. Comparison of hyperspectral imaging and computer vision for automatic differentiation of organically and conventionally farmed salmon. Journal of Food Engineering 196 (2017), 170182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Yasuma Fumihito, Mitsunaga Tomoo, Iso Daisuke, and Nayar Shree K.. 2010. Generalized assorted pixel camera: Postcapture control of resolution, dynamic range, and spectrum. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 19, 9 (2010), 22412253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Yokoya Naoto, Yairi Takehisa, and Iwasaki Akira. 2011. Coupled non-negative matrix factorization (CNMF) for hyperspectral and multispectral data fusion: Application to pasture classification. In 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 17791782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Yokoya Naoto, Zhu Xiao Xiang, and Plaza Antonio. 2017. Multisensor coupled spectral unmixing for time-series analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 55, 5 (2017), 28422857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Zhang Hongyan, Zhang Liangpei, and Shen Huanfeng. 2012. A super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for hyperspectral images. Signal Processing 92, 9 (2012), 20822096.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. [44] Zhang Lei, Nie Jiangtao, Wei Wei, Zhang Yanning, Liao Shengcai, and Shao Ling. 2020. Unsupervised adaptation learning for hyperspectral imagery super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 30733082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Zhao Yongqiang, Yang Jinxiang, Zhang Qingyong, Song Lin, Cheng Yongmei, and Pan Quan. 2011. Hyperspectral imagery super-resolution by sparse representation and spectral regularization. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2011, 1 (2011), 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Zhu Zhiyu, Hou Junhui, Chen Jie, Zeng Huanqiang, and Zhou Jiantao. 2020. Residual component estimating CNN for image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 (2020), 14231428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Zou Changzhong and Huang Xusheng. 2020. Hyperspectral image super-resolution combining with deep learning and spectral unmixing. Signal Processing: Image Communication 84 (2020), 115833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deep Self-Supervised Hyperspectral Image Reconstruction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
      ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 18, Issue 3s
      October 2022
      381 pages
      ISSN:1551-6857
      EISSN:1551-6865
      DOI:10.1145/3567476
      • Editor:
      • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 November 2022
      • Online AM: 23 August 2022
      • Accepted: 1 January 2022
      • Revised: 12 November 2021
      • Received: 5 July 2021
      Published in tomm Volume 18, Issue 3s

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format