skip to main content
10.1145/3510513.3510517acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicnccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fair Personalized Recommendation through Improved Matrix Factorization by Neural Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing recommendation systems mainly focus on the improvement of accuracy but neglect to involve non-popular items, which leads to the unfairness problem of recommendation results. More specifically, the low exposure rate of non-popular items impairs the diversity of recommendation results and thus weakens the customer experience for online e-commerce platforms. To address this problem, we propose a Fair Personalized Recommendation Algorithm(FPRA) combining improved Matrix Factorization and Back-Propagation Neural Network, which can simultaneously acquire both the accuracy and the fairness of recommendation results. In the FPRA, popular items and non-popular items are separated according to a pre-defined proportion. On the one hand, we consider that the influence of scenario factors (i.e., browsing location, clicking number, etc.) will generate users’ assessment bias for popular items, and we leverage BP Neural Networks to train the bias when recommending popular items. On the other hand, we design a new function, namely Fairness & Accuracy function, to achieve the goal that non-popular items will be presented to customers more frequently. Using this function, the goal can be achieved by searching for the optimal solution under the condition constraints. Experimental results show that the effectiveness of our proposed that FPRA greatly outperforms other baseline methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. [1] Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group[J]. Journal of the american Medical Directors association, 2013, 14(8): 542-559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] S. B. Roy, S. Amer-Yahia, A. Chawla, G. Das, and C. Yu, “Space efficiency in group recommendation,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 877–900, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] S. Amer-Yahia, S. B. Roy, A. Chawlat, G. Das, and C. Yu, “Group recommendation: Semantics and efficiency,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 754–765, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] T. N. Nguyen and F. Ricci, “Situation-dependent combination of long-term and session-based preferences in group recommendations: an experimental analysis,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2018, pp. 1366–1373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] N. Capuano, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, H. Fujita, and V. Loia, “Fuzzy group decision making for influence-aware recommendations,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 101, pp. 371–379, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] J. Castro, J. Lu, G. Zhang, Y. Dong, and L. Martínez, “Opinion dynamics-based group recommender systems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2394–2406, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Christensen I, Schiaffino S, Armentano M. Social group recommendation in the tourism domain[J]. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2016, 47(2): 209-231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] B.-H. Li, A.-M. Zhang, W. Zheng, S. Wan, X.-L. Qin, X. Li, and H.-L. Yin, “Grip: a group recommender based on interactive preference model,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1039–1055, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] H. Xu, Y. Ding, J. Sun, K. Zhao, and Y. Chen, “Dynamic group recommendation based on the attention mechanism,” Future Internet, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 198, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] H. Steck, “Calibrated recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems, 2018, pp. 154–162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] M. Kaya and D. Bridge, “A comparison of calibrated and intent-aware recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 2019, pp. 151–159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] R. Konishi, F. Nakamura, and Y. Kiyoki, “Calibrated web personalization with adaptive recurrent computing,” in 2020 IEEE 14th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 9–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] I. Rabiu, N. Salim, A. Da’u, and A. Osman, “Recommender system based on temporal models: a systematic review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 2204, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Z. Farahi, A. Moeini, and A. Kamandi, “Bloofi representation for item/user in recommender systems,” in 2019 5th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 67–73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] K. Huang, Y. Liu, S. Nepal, Y. Fan, S. Chen, and W. Tan, “A novel equitable trustworthy mechanism for service recommendation in the evolving service ecosystem,” in International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing.   Springer, 2014, pp. 510–517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Z. Jia, Y. Yang, W. Gao, and X. Chen, “User-based collaborative filtering for tourist attraction recommendations,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology.   IEEE, 2015, pp. 22–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Zhao, Zhi-Dan, and Ming-Sheng Shang. ”User-based collaborative-filtering recommendation algorithms on hadoop.” 2010 third international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] H. Abdollahpouri and R. Burke, “Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13158, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Burke R. Multisided fairness for recommendation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00093, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICNCC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Networks, Communication and Computing
    December 2021
    146 pages
    ISBN:9781450385848
    DOI:10.1145/3510513

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 May 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format