skip to main content
10.1145/3510513.3510535acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicnccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Energy Efficiency Evaluation Scheme of IPHC over CSMA and TSCH in 6LoWPAN Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many studies have focused on the impact of Media Access Control (MAC) layer protocols on wireless sensor networks (WSN). In realistic Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios, multiple protocols are used to ensure the efficient operation of the network. IP Header Compression (IPHC) is a well-known packet compression protocol in the IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN). Time Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) is specified as the latest generation of MAC layer protocol in the IEEE 802.15.4e standard. Since the emergence of battery-powered WSN, low cost and low power consumption have become important development directions. This article studies the performance of TSCH on IPHC in terms of energy consumption and compares with Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA). Different metrics were chosen, such as latency, duty cycle, packet delivery rate, and energy consumption. The experiment uses the Contiki-NG operating system to implement network transmission scenarios. The results show that the combination of IPHC and TSCH protocols greatly improves the capability of WSN, and has better performance in terms of energy consumption and duty cycle. Although TSCH exhibits a higher latency than CSMA, it obtains a better packet delivery rate.

References

  1. Al-Sarawi, S., Anbar, M., Alieyan, K., & Alzubaidi, M. 2017. Internet of Things (IoT) communication protocols. In 2017 8th International conference on information technology (ICIT), May 2017, pp.685-690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Yousheng, G., Lingyun, Y., & Lijing, H. 2017. Addressing scheme based on three-dimensional space over 6LoWPAN for the internet of things. In 2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), October 2017. pp. 59-64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dutta, P., & Dunkels, A. 2012. Operating systems and network protocols for wireless sensor networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, January 2012. 370(1958), 68-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., & Culler, D. 2007. Transmission of IPv6 packets over IEEE 802.15. 4 networks. Internet proposed standard RFC, 4944, 130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Shah, H., Shrimali, R., & Parikh, V. 2016. Header Compression and Neighbor Discovery in 6LoWPAN based IoT-a survey. In 2016 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), March 2016, pp. 306-311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ines, H. 2018. Performance of IEEE802. 15.4 e TSCH protocol for multi-hop wireless sensor networks. In 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), May 2018. pp. 603-608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nam, S. J., Kang, J., & Moon, D. 2015. Wireless packet header compression techniques for Ship Area Sensor Network (SASN). In 2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), October 2015. pp. 2048-2052.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Viana, S. G., Vieira, L. F., & Vieira, M. A. 2021. Performance evaluation of AODV over CSMA and TSCH. Internet Technology Letters, February 2021. e276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mishra, S., Singh, P., Arora, D., & Agrawal, K. K. 2017. Analyzing and evaluating the performance of 6L0WPAN and RPL using CONTIKI. In 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS), December 2017. pp. 1100-1105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Azzedine Boukerche. 2008. Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. March 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunkels, A., Gronvall, B., & Voigt, T. 2004. Contiki-a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In 29th annual IEEE international conference on local computer networks. November 2004.pp. 455-462. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Degermark, M., Nordgren, B., & Pink, S. 1999. IP header compression. RFC 2507, february.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Baccelli, E., Gündoğan, C., Hahm, O., Kietzmann, P., Lenders, M. S., Petersen, H., ... & Wählisch, M. 2018. RIOT: An open source operating system for low-end embedded devices in the IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, December 2018. 5(6), 4428-4440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Joe, H., Lee, J., Woo, D. K., Mah, P., & Kim, H. 2009. Demo abstract: A high-fidelity sensor network simulator using accurate CC2420 model. In 2009 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, April 2009. pp. 429-430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. Instruments and I. Slas. 2011. MSP430F15x, MSP430F16x, MSP430F161x MIXED SIGNAL MICROCONTROLLER. October 2002. pp. 1-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nasseri, M., Al-Olimat, H., Alam, M., Kim, J., Green, R., & Cheng, W. 2015. Contiki Cooja simulation for time bounded localization in wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Communications & Networking, April 2015. pp. 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Schandy, J., Steinfeld, L., & Silveira, F. 2015. Average power consumption breakdown of Wireless Sensor Network nodes using IPv6 over LLNs. In 2015 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, June 2015. pp. 242-247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Son, N. M., Thinh, T. N., Thi, N. D., & Nhan, N. C. 2016. An approach of low power wifi sensor mote for internet of things applications. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, Aug 2016 7(4), 161-166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICNCC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Networks, Communication and Computing
    December 2021
    146 pages
    ISBN:9781450385848
    DOI:10.1145/3510513

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 May 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format