Sam Brooker
ABSTRACT
In 2017 Professor of Literature John Farrell published The Varieties of Authorial Intention. Joining other dissenting voices past and present, this work addressed what the author considered a key tenet of mid- to late 20th century literary criticism: that reference to authorial intention is out of bounds, literary works being constituted by the text alone.
Hypertext fiction has its own complex relationship with the notion of intention. From earlier entanglement in post-structuralist approaches to network textuality and the potential for readers to evade authors via branching narratives, hypertext fiction emerged as a distinctive form of textuality that can express intention in unique and unexpected ways.
How effectively do the three modes of authorial intention Farrell identifies - communicative, artistic, practical – map to hypertext fiction both past and future? Can this model – devised in the context of linear print writing – accommodate the unique form of textuality represented by hypertext, with its own affordances and opportunities to express intent?
- Douglas, J. Yellowlees. Is There a Reader in this Labyrinth? Notes on Reading a Hypertext Novella. In Computers and Writing: State of the Art. Eds. Patrik O'Brien Holt and Noel Williams. Oxford: Intellect PressGoogle Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. K. and Monroe Beardsley. 1946. The Intentional Fallacy. The Sewanee Review (54, 3), 468–488.Google Scholar
- Barthes, R. 1967. The Death of the Author. In: Image Music Text. Stephen Heath, trans. New York: Hill and Wang, 142-148Google Scholar
- Landow, George P. 1997. Hypertext 2.0: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, J. Yellowlees. 2003. The end of books - or books without end? Reading interactive narratives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
- Nehamas, A. 1986. What an author is. The Journal of Philosophy 83(11), 685-91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirsch, E. D. Jr. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Hawthorn, J. Authority and the Death of the Author. In 2008. Donovan, S, Fjellestad, D, Lunden, R. (eds) Authority Matters. New York, NY: Rodopi, 65-88.Google Scholar
- Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. 1977. What is an author? In Language, Counter-memory, Practice, edited by Donald Bouchard, 113-38. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Burke, S. 1992. The Death and Return of the Author. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, B. 1985. The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins PressGoogle Scholar
- Farrell, J. 2017. The Varieties of Authorial Intention. New York, NY: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
- Joyce, M. 1995. Nonce Upon Some Times: Rereading Hypertext Fiction. Modern Fiction Studies 43: 579-97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liestøl, G. 1994. "Wittgenstein, Genette, and the Reader's Narrative in Hypertext. In: Hyper/Text/Theory, George Landow (ed). Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 87-120.Google Scholar
- Hayles, N. Katherine. 2007. Electronic Literature: What is it? Electronic Literature. Accessed Feb 16, 2022. https://eliterature.org/pad/elp.html.Google Scholar
- Mazzali-Lurati, S. 2007. Here is the author! Hyperlinks as constitutive rules of hypertextual communication. Semiotica 167 (1,4): 135-168Google Scholar
- Douglas, J. Y.. 1994. How Do I Stop This Thing?: Closure and Indeterminacy in Interactive Narratives. In Hyper/Text/Theory, Landow (ed), George, 159-188. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, M. 2009. On hypertext narrative. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Torino, June 29-July 01 2009, 5-14, New York, NY: ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joyce, M. 1987. afternoon, a story. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems.Google Scholar
- Gaggi, S. 1997 From Text To Hypertext: Decentering the Subject in Fiction, Film, the Visual Arts, and Electronic Media. The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Kermode, F. 1979. The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Landow, G. 1987. Relationally Encoded Links and the Rhetoric of Hypertext." Hypertext '87 Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, pp.331-45Google Scholar
- Marshall, C. 1998. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of the ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 40-49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Murch, W. 1992. In the Blink of an Eye. 1995. Hollywood, CA:Silman-James Press.Google Scholar
- Kendall, R. and Jean-Hughes Réty. 2000. Toward an Organic Hypertext. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM on Hypertext and Hypermedia, May 30-June 3 2000, San Antonio, TX, 161-170. New York, NY: ACM Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lyotard, J. F. 1979. The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge, translated by Bennington, Geoff & Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Ryan, M L. 2003. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernstein, M. and Diane Greco. 2008. Designing A New Media Economy. Genre, 41(3/4), 59-82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mitchell, A. & Kevin McGee. 2012. The Paradox of Rereading in Hypertext Fiction. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Milwaukee, WI, June 25-28, 2012, 103–112. New York, NY: ACM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Selig, R.L. 2000. The Endless Reading of Fiction: Stuart Moulthrop's Hypertext Novel Victory Garden. Contemporary Literature, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 642-59Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walker, J. 1999. Piecing together and tearing apart: finding the story in afternoon. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 111- 117Google ScholarDigital Library
- McDaid, John. We Knew the Glass Man. cream city review, 2019. http://io.creamcityreview.org/ 43-1/McDaid/WeKnewtheGlassMan_v1.1.html.Google Scholar
- Is there an Author in this Labyrinth?: Hypertext Fiction and Farrell's Textual Fallacy
Recommendations
Links Of Darkness: Hypertext And Horror
HT '22: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social MediaCategory fiction adopts a formal narrative framework to explore topics of mutual interest to readers and writers. Originating as a means of assisting retail booksellers and movie theaters in their work of matching readers and writers, categories like “...
Story/story
HT '12: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM conference on Hypertext and social mediaThis paper starts with an introductory essay stating the issues and discussing the notion of metafiction. Then it continues in an online hypertext narrative demonstration of the interweaving of story and meta-story. The hypertext attempts to show in ...
Feral hypertext: when hypertext literature escapes control
HYPERTEXT '05: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermediaThis paper presents a historical view of hypertext looking at pre-web hypertext as a domesticated species bred in captivity, and arguing that on the web, some breeds of hypertext have gone feral. Feral hypertext is no longer tame and domesticated, but ...
Comments