skip to main content
10.1145/3511716.3511753acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Model Construction and Application Analysis of the Comprehensive Quality Evaluation System of College Students in the Intelligent Era

Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper will focus on the construction of the comprehensive quality evaluation index system for application-oriented local college students.clarify the comprehensive quality evaluation standards of students in applied local colleges and universities with the help of big data and intelligent technology, and construct the key element framework of intelligent evaluation; According to the four basic elements of the achievement of students' training objectives, the adaptability of social needs and the satisfaction of students and employers, the principal component analysis method is used to construct the corresponding index system.

References

  1. Russell F. Waugh.2010.Approaches to studying for students in higher education: A Rasch measurement model analysis the British Journal of Educational and Psychological. the British Psychological Society.Vol.69, Issue1,)63-79(,)Dec,2010(.https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157572Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Donald, J. G. and Denison, D. B. 1996. Evaluating undergraduate education: The use of broad indicators. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21: 23–39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yang Jing,Wei Hua Jing,Zhang Guoqiang.2011. Investigation and analysis of College Students' comprehensive quality. Journal of Higher Correspondence Education (PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION); Issue 01, 2011 China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang Yang. 2014, Optimization of College Students' comprehensive quality evaluation system – from the perspective of improving students' quality. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University of science and technology. (02): 89-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A M.DALENEY. 2001.Asessing Undergraduste Education from Graduating Seniors" Perspective: Poer Insitutions Proride the Cntext DD. Tertiary Education and Management, Vol.3,  Issue7: 255-276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bao Jiguo, Cui Liying. 2020.Research on comprehensive quality evaluation of college students in Applied Universities. Journal of Mudanjiang Institute of education, Issue 10:65-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lu Guanghong, Yin Weina, 2017Chen Huiping. Research on comprehensive quality evaluation index of college students based on AHP . Modern education,Vol.23, Issue 04: 116-118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang Na, Zhao Fu.2008.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in the evaluation of College Students' comprehensive quality; Scientific and technological information (Academic Research); Issue 02,112-113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. He Haibin, Li Bin, Li Jia. 2017.Application of multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in teaching evaluation of steel structure curriculum design . Curriculum education research, Issue8:34-56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang Ding, Ren Hongyu, Wang Qian. 2019. Study on the effectiveness of comprehensive quality evaluation results – Based on the correlation analysis between academic achievement and comprehensive quality evaluation indicators, Research on educational development, issue 20, 18-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Haifeng, Li muzhou. 2020.Building a new educational evaluation system with complementary functions of "four in one" . China examination,Issue 09: 1-4 + 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mladen Koljatic, George D.Kuh.A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education.Higher Education,2001,42,(3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. McClelland, D.C. (1973) Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Richard E. Boyatzis.(1982).The competent manager: A model for effective performance, Wiley, New York, No. of pages: 308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fresko, Barbara; Nasser, Fadia. Interpreting student ratings: consultation, instructional modification, and attitudes towards course evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation Volume: 36, Issue:4,2001:291-305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang, J., Lu, C., Wang, J., Wang, L., Yue, X.-G. Concrete cracks detection based on FCN with dilated convolution (2019) Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9 (13), art. no. 2686. DOI: 10.3390/app9132686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. He, H., Li, S., Hu, L., Duarte, N., Manta, O., Yue, X.-G. Risk factor identification of sustainable guarantee network based on logistic regression algorithm (2019) Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (13), art. no. 3525. DOI: 10.3390/su11133525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Luan, Y., Li, Y., Yue, X., Cao, Y., Xiang, F., Mao, D., Xiong, Z. Metabonomics of mice intestine in Codonopsis foetens induced apoptosis of intestine cancer cells (2019) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26 (5), pp. 1003-1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.11.010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Teng, H., WanG, S., Yue, X.-G. Application of big data technology in emergency decision system (2019) PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 93-97. DOI: 10.1145/3352740.3352756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Haikun, T., Shiying, W., Xinsheng, L., Yue, X.-G. Speech recognition model based on deep learning and application in pronunciation quality evaluation system (2019) PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1145/3335656.3335657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, Y., Luan, Y., Yue, X., Xiang, F., Mao, D., Cao, Y., Xiong, Z. Effects of Codonopis bulleynana forest ex diels on Deferribacteres in constipation predominant intestine tumor: Differential analysis 2019) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26 (2), pp. 395-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.11.008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBIMCS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
    December 2021
    539 pages
    ISBN:9781450395687
    DOI:10.1145/3511716

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format