skip to main content
10.1145/3511716.3511756acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Risk Influencing Factors of Logistics Information Ecosystem Based on Interpretive Structural Modeling

Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on the research results of logistics information ecosystem risk, the author identifies 26 factors that affect logistics information ecosystem risk. The adjacency matrix of 26 influencing factors is constructed according to the relationship between influencing factors. Using Python software to calculate the reachability matrix of influencing factors, and simplify the reachability matrix. Calculate the reachable set, antecedent set and common set of influencing factors. The 26 influencing factors are divided into 6 levels. Rearrange and simplify reachability matrix. The interpretive structural modeling of risk influencing factors of logistics information ecosystem is constructed. The interpretive structural modeling of influencing factors is divided into superficial layer, middle layer and root layer. The factors in the superficial layer include multi-party coordination mechanism, reward and punishment mechanism and system formulation mechanism. The factor in the root layer includes information culture atmosphere. The factors in the middle layer include 22 factors such as logistics information security, logistics information accuracy, logistics information timeliness, logistics information sharing, logistics information adaptability, technical level of logistics employees, logistics personnel equipment configuration, etc. The factor in the root layer not only directly affects the factors in the middle layer and the factors in the superficial layer, but also indirectly affects them. Finally, the paper analyzes the reasons for the formation of the hierarchical relationship of influencing factors, in order to provide theoretical guidance for the stable operation of logistics industry.

References

  1. Lou C. Q., Fan P. X., YE L.. 2015. Risk Prevention Strategy of Network Information Ecological Chain. J. Library and Information Service, 22, (2015), 19-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhu G. L., Yan S.. 2007. Research on Logistics Informatization System Risk of Iron and Steel Enterprises J. Microcomputer Information, 27,(2007), 1-2+96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang S., WANG Z. P., Yang A. H. . 2018. Research on Application of Electronic Signature Technology in Information Risk Prevention and Control of Pharmaceutical Cold Chain Logistics. J. China Market, 34, (2018), 164-165+168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jia X. H., Zhang D. H.. 2021. Study on the Mechanism of Information Risk of Marine Logistics on Operational Risk. J. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 1, (2021), 59-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang Y., Guo J. K., Bai Y. . 2008. On Security Construction of Military Logistics Information System. J. China Storage and Transportation, 3, (2008), 106-107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sun X. Y.. 2018. Research on Logistics Network Risk Management under the Background of Cross-border E-commerce .D. Dalian University of Technology, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zheng X. H.. 2017. Risk Identification and Assessment of Cross-border E-commerce Third-party Logistics. D. Taiyuan University of Technology, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang L., Dong C. Y.. 2020. Research on Risk Identification and Evaluation of Highway Logistics Information Platform Based on ANP Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. J. Management Informatization in China, 16, (2020), 46-47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang J. , Zhou D. M., Zhang M.. 2011. Application and Security Research of Logistics Platform based on cloud Computing. J. Information Network Security, 10, (2011), 10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu X. , He J. , Huang D. J. . 2018. Research on Risk Prevention System Construction of Library Information Ecosystem. J. Journal of Agricultural Library and Information Science, 11, (2018), 24-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yu C. 2011. Research on Information Management of Project Risk from the Perspective of Information Ecology Theory - Taking Urban Drainage Online Monitoring System Project as an Example. D. Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu S. . 2018. Research on Risk Control of Network Information Ecological Chain. D. Guangxi University for Nationalities, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cao H. J. , Hou T. T.. 2021. Research on the Structural Relationship of Risk Influencing Factors of Government Public Opinion Based on ISM. J. Hubei Social Sciences, 5, (2021), 43-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mao Z. J. , Huang Y. X. , Xu X. . 2019. Information Security Risk Analysis and Countermeasures of Smart City from the Perspective of Forest Information Ecology. J. Chinese Public Administration, 9, (2019), 123-129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lou D, Lou C. Q.. 2018. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Information Needs of the Elderly Based on Interpretative Structure Model [J]. Library and Information Work, 7 (2018), 88-95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, C., Yue, X.-G. Ultrasonic excitation - fiber bragg grating sensing technique for damage identification (2018) International Journal of Online Engineering, 14 (7), pp. 124-136. DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v14i07.8969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Haikun, T., Xinsheng, L., Haitao, L., Xiao-Guang, Y. Research and application of the IOT gateway based on the real-time specification for Java (2018) International Journal of Online Engineering, 14 (3), pp. 129-141. DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v14i03.8419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cao, Y., Xiong, F., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., Yue, X., He, X., Wang, L. Pow law in random symbolic sequences (2017) Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32 (4), pp. 733-738. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqw046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Madfa, A.A., Senan, E.M., Yue, X.-G. Tensile stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with cast-made and prefabricated dental posts (2017) Journal of Oral Research, 6 (9), pp. 237-244. DOI: 10.17126/joralres.2017.068.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zunjic, A., Tsaklis, P.V., Yue, X.-G. The relationship between ergonomics, safety and aesthetics in the design of consumer products and systems (2017) Ergonomic Design and Assessment of Products and Systems, pp. 1-18. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yue, X.-G., McAleer, M. Prediction of gas concentration based on the opposite degree algorithm (2017) Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 6, pp. 154-162. DOI: 10.6000/1929-7092.2017.06.13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Luan, Y., Cao, Y., Mao, D., Li, Y., Yue, X., Zhao, Y., Xiong, F., Rong, J., He, C. RNA sequencing reveals the differences between chemical and chronic constipation induction of intestinal tumor (2017) Biomedical Research (India), 28 (22), pp. 10053-10061.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiao-Guang, Y., Yong, D. Editorial (2017) Transformations in Business and Economics, 16 (2B), pp. 605-606 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBIMCS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
    December 2021
    539 pages
    ISBN:9781450395687
    DOI:10.1145/3511716

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format