skip to main content
10.1145/3511808.3557581acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Dialogue State Tracking Based on Hierarchical Slot Attention and Contrastive Learning

Published:17 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dialogue state is a key information in traditional task-oriented dialogue systems, which represents the user's dialogue intention at each moment through a set of (slot, value). The recent methods model the slot and the dialogue context to keep track of the state, but there is a lack of refinement of context information. They do not consider the influence of dialogue context in different scenarios. Our proposed approach utilizes a fine-grained representation of each slot at multiple levels and incorporates an interaction mechanism to obtain a weight of past memory, present utterance and relevance of the slots. Besides, to address the problem that the dialogue utterance is semantically distant from the corresponding slot value, we introduce the contrastive learning to make the utterance embedding mapped under each slot name more suitable with the ground truth value and away from other slot values. This improves the accuracy of mapping between feature space and semantic space. In the predefined ontology-based approaches, our model achieves leading results with both MultiWOZ2.0 and MultiWOZ2.1 datasets.

References

  1. Paweł Budzianowski, Tsung-Hsien Wen, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Inigo Casanueva, Stefan Ultes, Osman Ramadan, and Milica Gasić. 2018. MultiWOZ--A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00278 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Junfan Chen, Richong Zhang, Yongyi Mao, and Jie Xu. 2020. Parallel interactive networks for multi-domain dialogue state generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.07616 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu Chen, Boer Lv, Chi Wang, Su Zhu, Bowen Tan, and Kai Yu. 2020. Schemaguided multi-domain dialogue state tracking with graph attention neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 7521--7528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mihail Eric, Rahul Goel, Shachi Paul, Abhishek Sethi, Sanchit Agarwal, Shuyang Gao, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2019. Multiwoz 2.1: Multi-domain dialogue state corrections and state tracking baselines. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jinyu Guo, Kai Shuang, Jijie Li, and Zihan Wang. 2021. Dual Slot Selector via Local Reliability Verification for Dialogue State Tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12578 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie, and Ross Girshick. 2020. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 9729--9738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Heck, Carel van Niekerk, Nurul Lubis, Christian Geishauser, Hsien-Chin Lin, Marco Moresi, and Milica Gasic. 2020. Trippy: A triple copy strategy for value independent neural dialog state tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02877 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sungdong Kim, Sohee Yang, Gyuwan Kim, and Sang-Woo Lee. 2019. Efficient dialogue state tracking by selectively overwriting memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03906 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwaran Lee, Jinsik Lee, and Tae-Yoon Kim. 2019. Sumbt: Slot-utterance matching for universal and scalable belief tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07421 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Han Liu, Feng Zhang, Xiaotong Zhang, Siyang Zhao, and Xianchao Zhang. 2021. An Explicit-Joint and Supervised-Contrastive Learning Framework for Few-Shot Intent Classification and Slot Filling. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021. 1945--1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liliang Ren, Jianmo Ni, and Julian McAuley. 2019. Scalable and accurate dialogue state tracking via hierarchical sequence generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00754 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yong Shan, Zekang Li, Jinchao Zhang, Fandong Meng, Yang Feng, Cheng Niu, and Jie Zhou. 2020. A Contextual Hierarchical Attention Network with Adaptive Objective for Dialogue State Tracking. CoRR abs/2006.01554 (2020). arXiv:2006.01554 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01554Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hao Tang, Guoshuai Zhao, Yuxia Wu, and Xueming Qian. 2021. Multisamplebased Contrastive Loss for Top-k Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2021), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2021.3126146Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Aaron Van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv--1807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chien-Sheng Wu, Andrea Madotto, Ehsan Hosseini-Asl, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, and Pascale Fung. 2019. Transferable multi-domain state generator for task-oriented dialogue systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08743 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. YuxiaWu, Lizi Liao, Gangyi Zhang,Wenqiang Lei, Guoshuai Zhao, Xueming Qian, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2022. State Graph Reasoning for Multimodal Conversational Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (2022), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2022.3155900Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Fanghua Ye, Jarana Manotumruksa, Qiang Zhang, Shenghui Li, and Emine Yilmaz. 2021. Slot Self-Attentive Dialogue State Tracking. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 1598--1608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Xuanzhi Zheng, Guoshuai Zhao, Li Zhu, Jihua Zhu, and Xueming Qian. 2022. What You Like, What I Am: Online Dating Recommendation via Matching Individual Preferences with Features. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2022), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3148485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jingyao Zhou, Haipang Wu, Zehao Lin, Guodun Li, and Yin Zhang. 2021. Dialogue state tracking with multi-level fusion of predicted dialogue states and conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.05168 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dialogue State Tracking Based on Hierarchical Slot Attention and Contrastive Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2022
      5274 pages
      ISBN:9781450392365
      DOI:10.1145/3511808
      • General Chairs:
      • Mohammad Al Hasan,
      • Li Xiong

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '22 Paper Acceptance Rate621of2,257submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader