skip to main content
10.1145/3511808.3557592acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Efficient Non-sampling Expert Finding

Published:17 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Expert finding aims at seeking potential users to answer new questions in Community Question Answering (CQA) websites. Most existing methods focus on designing matching frameworks between questions and experts, and rely on negative sampling technology for model training. However, sampling would lose lots of useful information about experts and questions, and make these sampling-based methods suffer the bias and non-robust issues, which may lead to an insufficient matching performance for expert findings. In this paper, we propose a novel Efficient Non-sampling Expert Finding model, named ENEF, which could learn accurate representations of questions and experts from whole training data. In our approach, we adopt a rather basic question encoder and a simple matching framework, then an efficient whole-data optimization method is elaborately designed to learn the model parameters without negative sampling with rather a low space and time complexity. Extensive experimental results on four real-world CQA datasets demonstrate that our model ENEF could achieve better performance and faster training efficiency than existing state-of-the-art expert finding methods.

References

  1. Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, and Maarten de Rijke. 2009. A language modeling framework for expert finding. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 45, 1 (2009), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chong Chen, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2020. Efficient non-sampling factorization machines for optimal context-aware recommendation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2400--2410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chong Chen, Min Zhang, Chenyang Wang, Weizhi Ma, Minming Li, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. An efficient adaptive transfer neural network for social-aware recommendation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 225--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hanyin Fang, Fei Wu, Zhou Zhao, Xinyu Duan, Yueting Zhuang, and Martin Ester. 2016. Community-based question answering via heterogeneous social network learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jinlan Fu, Yi Li, Qi Zhang, Qinzhuo Wu, Renfeng Ma, Xuanjing Huang, and Yu-Gang Jiang. 2020. Recurrent memory reasoning network for expert finding in community question answering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 187--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Negin Ghasemi, Ramin Fatourechi, and Saeedeh Momtazi. 2021. User Embedding for Expert Finding in Community Question Answering. Proceedings of the ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, Vol. 15, 4 (2021), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xiangnan He, Hanwang Zhang, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2016. Fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 549--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Ieee, 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zongcheng Ji and Bin Wang. 2013. Learning to rank for question routing in community question answering. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2363--2368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zeyu Li, Jyun-Yu Jiang, Yizhou Sun, and Wei Wang. 2019. Personalized question routing via heterogeneous network embedding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 192--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xipeng Qiu and Xuanjing Huang. 2015. Convolutional neural tensor network architecture for community-based question answering. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Neural Information Processing Systems. 5998--6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Menghan Wang, Mingming Gong, Xiaolin Zheng, and Kun Zhang. 2018. Modeling dynamic missingness of implicit feedback for recommendation. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 31 (2018), 6669.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Bo Zong, Yuncong Chen, Jianwu Xu, Ding Li, and Haifeng Chen. 2020. Temporal Context-Aware Representation Learning for Question Routing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 753--761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Non-sampling Expert Finding

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2022
      5274 pages
      ISBN:9781450392365
      DOI:10.1145/3511808
      • General Chairs:
      • Mohammad Al Hasan,
      • Li Xiong

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '22 Paper Acceptance Rate621of2,257submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader