skip to main content
10.1145/3512527.3531436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weakly Supervised Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Ultrasonic Images via Automatic Anatomical RoI Detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bone age assessment (BAA) is vital in pediatric clinical diagnosis. Existing deep learning methods predict bone age based on Regions of Interest (RoIs) detection or segmentation of hand radiograph, which requires expensive annotations. Limitations of radiographic technique on imaging and cost hinder their clinical application as well. Compared to X-ray images, ultrasonic images are rather clean, cheap and flexible, but the deep learning research on ultrasonic BAA is still a white space. For this purpose, we propose a weakly supervised interpretable framework entitled USB-Net, utilizing ultrasonic pelvis images and only image-level age annotations. USB-Net consists of automatic anatomical RoI detection stage and age assessment stage. In the detection stage, USB-Net locates the discriminative anatomical RoIs of pelvis through attention heatmap without any extra RoI supervision. In the assessment stage, the cropped anatomical RoI patch is fed as fine-grained input to estimate age. In addition, we provide the first ultrasonic BAA dataset composed of 1644 ultrasonic hip joint images with image-level labels of age and gender. The experimental results verify that our model keeps consistent attention with human knowledge and achieves 16.24 days mean absolute error (MAE) on USBAA dataset.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

icmr22-ss3258.mp4

mp4

18.1 MB

References

  1. Byeonguk Bae, Jaewon Lee, Seo Taek Kong, Jinkyeong Sung, and Kyu-Hwan Jung. 2020. Manifold Ordinal-Mixup for Ordered Classes in TW3-Based Bone Age Assessment. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 662--670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. ADMV Castriota-Scanderbeg and V De Micheli. 1995. Ultrasound of femoral head cartilage: a new method of assessing bone age. Skeletal radiology, Vol. 24, 3 (1995), 197--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jintai Chen, Bohan Yu, Biwen Lei, Ruiwei Feng, Danny Z Chen, and Jian Wu. 2020. Doctor Imitator: A Graph-Based Bone Age Assessment Framework Using Hand Radiographs. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 764--774.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Maria Escobar, Cristina González, Felipe Torres, Laura Daza, Gustavo Triana, and Pablo Arbeláez. 2019. Hand pose estimation for pediatric bone age assessment. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 531--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jianlong Fu, Heliang Zheng, and Tao Mei. 2017. Look closer to see better: Recurrent attention convolutional neural network for fine-grained image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4438--4446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ping Gong, Zihao Yin, Yizhou Wang, and Yizhou Yu. 2020. Towards Robust Bone Age Assessment: Rethinking Label Noise and Ambiguity. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 621--630.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. William Walter Greulich and Sarah Idell Pyle. 1959. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist .Stanford university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jie Hu, Li Shen, and Gang Sun. 2018. Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. 2017. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4700--4708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Vladimir I Iglovikov, Alexander Rakhlin, Alexandr A Kalinin, and Alexey A Shvets. 2018. Paediatric bone age assessment using deep convolutional neural networks. In Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. Springer, 300--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Khalid M Khan, Bradley S Miller, Eric Hoggard, Arif Somani, and Kyriakie Sarafoglou. 2009. Application of ultrasound for bone age estimation in clinical practice. The Journal of pediatrics, Vol. 154, 2 (2009), 243--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. David B Larson, Matthew C Chen, Matthew P Lungren, Safwan S Halabi, Nicholas V Stence, and Curtis P Langlotz. 2018. Performance of a deep-learning neural network model in assessing skeletal maturity on pediatric hand radiographs. Radiology, Vol. 287, 1 (2018), 313--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Chuanbin Liu, Hongtao Xie, Yunyan Yan, Zhendong Mao, and Yongdong Zhang. 2020 b. Learning Rich Attention for Pediatric Bone Age Assessment. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 232--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chuanbin Liu, Hongtao Xie, Sicheng Zhang, Zhendong Mao, Jun Sun, and Yongdong Zhang. 2020 c. Misshapen Pelvis Landmark Detection With Local-Global Feature Learning for Diagnosing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 39, 12 (2020), 3944--3954. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3008382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chuanbin Liu, Hongtao Xie, and Yongdong Zhang. 2020 a. Self-supervised Attention Mechanism for Pediatric Bone Age Assessment with Efficient Weak Annotation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Simukayi Mutasa, Peter D Chang, Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro, and Rama Ayyala. 2018. MABAL: a novel deep-learning architecture for machine-assisted bone age labeling. Journal of digital imaging, Vol. 31, 4 (2018), 513--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Xuhua Ren, Tingting Li, Xiujun Yang, Shuai Wang, Sahar Ahmad, Lei Xiang, Shaun Richard Stone, Lihong Li, Yiqiang Zhan, Dinggang Shen, et al. 2018. Regression convolutional neural network for automated pediatric bone age assessment from hand radiograph. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, Vol. 23, 5 (2018), 2030--2038.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sung Joon Son, Youngmin Song, Namgi Kim, Younghae Do, Nojun Kwak, Mu Sook Lee, and Byoung-Dai Lee. 2019. TW3-based fully automated bone age assessment system using deep neural networks. IEEE Access, Vol. 7 (2019), 33346--33358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Concetto Spampinato, Simone Palazzo, Daniela Giordano, Marco Aldinucci, and Rosalia Leonardi. 2017. Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images. Medical image analysis, Vol. 36 (2017), 41--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe, Jon Shlens, and Zbigniew Wojna. 2016. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2818--2826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. James Mourilyan Tanner, RH Whitehouse, N Cameron, WA Marshall, MJR Healy, H Goldstein, et al. 2001. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method) .WB Saunders London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dong Wang, Kexin Zhang, Jia Ding, and Liwei Wang. 2020. Improve bone age assessment by learning from anatomical local regions. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 631--640.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sanghyun Woo, Jongchan Park, Joon-Young Lee, and In So Kweon. 2018. CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eric Wu, Bin Kong, Xin Wang, Junjie Bai, Yi Lu, Feng Gao, Shaoting Zhang, Kunlin Cao, Qi Song, Siwei Lyu, et al. 2019. Residual attention based network for hand bone age assessment. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). IEEE, 1158--1161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hongtao Xie, Dongbao Yang, Nannan Sun, Zhineng Chen, and Yongdong Zhang. 2019. Automated pulmonary nodule detection in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 85 (2019), 109--119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jingyuan Xu, Hongtao Xie, Chuanbin Liu, Fang Yang, Sicheng Zhang, Xun Chen, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Hip Landmark Detection With Dependency Mining in Ultrasound Image. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 40, 12 (2021), 3762--3774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3097355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Heliang Zheng, Jianlong Fu, Tao Mei, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Learning multi-attention convolutional neural network for fine-grained image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 5209--5217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Weakly Supervised Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Ultrasonic Images via Automatic Anatomical RoI Detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICMR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
        June 2022
        714 pages
        ISBN:9781450392389
        DOI:10.1145/3512527

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 June 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate254of830submissions,31%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICMR '24
        International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
        June 10 - 14, 2024
        Phuket , Thailand
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader