Andi Wiliam
ABSTRACT
This research gives a systematic literature review on technology adoption for the farmers that recognized precision agriculture. This research aims to identify the operational elements in relevant technology adoption precision agriculture and comprehend the relation between the following operational elements (Farm Size, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitation Condition, Attitude Toward, Behaviour Intention, Use Behaviour). In addition, this research aims to inspire research on technology adoption in precision agriculture and develop the proposed theoretical model in the future. This research is based on a systematic literature review on technology adoption with precision agriculture, especially precision agriculture, published in international journals between 2015-2020. This literature study shows that there is only a little research about technology adoption in precision agriculture.
- Y. Vecchio, M. De Rosa, F. Adinolfi, L. Bartoli, and M. Masi, “Land Use Policy Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis,” Land use policy, vol. 94, no. July 2019, p. 104481, 2020.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- G. Carli, V. Xhakollari, and M. R. Tagliaventi, “How to Model the Adoption and Perception of Precision Agriculture Technologies,” 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. G. Daberkow and W. D. M. C. Bride, “Farm and Operator Characteristics Affecting the Awareness and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies in the US,” pp. 163–177, 2003.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh , “USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW,” MIS Q., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 252–269, 2003.Google Scholar
- T. Zhou, Y. Lu, and B. Wang, “Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 760–767, 2010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Pillai, “Adoption of internet of things ( IoT ) in the agriculture industry deploying the BRT framework,” 2019.Google Scholar
- P. Jayashankar, S. Nilakanta, W. J. Johnston, P. Gill, R. Burres, and W. J. Johnston, “IoT adoption in agriculture: the role of trust , perceived value and risk,” 2018.Google Scholar
- R. Kabbiri, M. Dora, V. Kumar, G. Elepu, and X. Gellynck, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected?,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., no. October, pp. 0–1, 2017.Google Scholar
- M. Michels, W. Fecke, J. Henning, O. Musshoff, F. Lülfs, and B. Saskia, “‘ Anytime, anyplace , anywhere ’— A sample selection model of mobile internet adoption in german agriculture,” no. October 2019, pp. 1–16, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Dianah and paul muyinda Birevu, “Adoption and use of mobile technologies for learning among smallholder farmer communities in Uganda,” no. October, pp. 83–87, 2016.Google Scholar
- P. Verma and N. Sinha, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile-based agricultural extension service,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., no. July, pp. 0–1, 2017.Google Scholar
- S. Zheng, Z. Wang, C. J. Wachenheim, and C. J. Wachenheim, “Technology adoption among farmers in Jilin Province , China The case of aerial pesticide application among farmers,” 2018.Google Scholar
- S. J. Alavion , “Adoption of Agricultural E-Marketing: Application of the Theory of Planned Adoption of Agricultural E-Marketing: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–15, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Alemu and S. Negash, “Mobile Information System for Small-Scale Rural Farmers,” no. Tiar, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. T. Far and K. Rezaei-moghaddam, “Determinants of Iranian agricultural consultants ’ intentions toward precision agriculture: Integrating innovativeness to the technology acceptance model,” J. SAUDI Soc. Agric. Sci., no. September, pp. 1–7, 2015.Google Scholar
- E. Beza, P. Reidsma, P. M. Poortvliet, M. Misker, and B. Sjors, “Exploring farmers ’ intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service ( SMS ) for citizen science in agriculture,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 151, no. February 2017, pp. 295–310, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. E. Sarcheshmeh, M. Bijani, and H. Sadighi, “Technology in Society Adoption behavior towards the use of nuclear technology in agriculture: A causal analysis,” Technol. Soc., no. July, pp. 0–1, 2018.Google Scholar
- M. Kante, R. Oboko, and C. Chepken, “An ICT model for increased adoption of farm input information in developing countries: A case in,” Inf. Process. Agric., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–46, 2019.Google Scholar
- W. Li , “A hybrid modelling approach to understanding adoption of precision agriculture technologies in Chinese cropping systems,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 172, no. February, p. 105305, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. C. Rose , “Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery,” AGSY, vol. 149, pp. 165–174, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Nejadrezaei, M. Sadegh, A. Mina, and S. Anastasios, “Factors affecting adoption of pressurized irrigation technology among olive farmers in Northern Iran,” Appl. Water Sci., 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Michels, V. Bonke, and O. Musshoff, “Understanding the adoption of smartphone apps in crop protection,” no. 0123456789, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Wang, L. Jin, and H. Mao, “Farmer Cooperatives ’ Intention to Adopt Agricultural Information Technology — Mediating Effects of Attitude,” 2019.Google Scholar
- D. Zhou and D. Abdullah, “The acceptance of solar water pump technology among rural farmers of northern Pakistan: A The acceptance of solar water pump technology among rural farmers of northern Pakistan: A structural equation model,” Cogent Food Agric., vol. 5, 2017.Google Scholar
- L. Mulugo , “Unravelling technology-acceptance factors influencing farmer use of banana tissue culture planting materials in Central Uganda,” African J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–13, 2019.Google Scholar
- L. K. Narine, A. Harder, and T. G. Roberts, “Farmers ’ intention to use text messaging for extension services in Trinidad,” vol. 8622, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Engotoit, G. M. Kituyi, and M. B. Moya, “Influence of Performance Expectancy on Commercial farmers ’ Intention to Use Mobile-based Communication Technologies for Agricultural market Information Dissemination in Uganda,” pp. 1–17, 2016.Google Scholar
- M. Nicholaus, M. Malongo, and S. Camilius, “In fl uence of socio-demographic factors on the use of mobile phones in accessing rice information on climate change adaptation in Tanzania,” 2018.Google Scholar
- J. Li, S. Feng, T. Luo, and Z. Guan, “What drives the adoption of sustainable production technology? Evidence from the large scale farming sector in East China,” J. Clean. Prod., 2020.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Analysis of Financial Technology User Acceptance Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Method
AbstractBehavioral Intention and Use Behavior can be interpreted as acceptance and utilization for users when using a system and how users can accept and use a system. The focus of Behavioral Intention and Use Behavior in this study is financial ...
Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies
Demographic and economic research perspectives have given a great deal of attention in recent years to the adoption of precision agriculture. However, very little attention has been given to the perceptions and attitudinal reasons for farmers to adopt ...
Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet
This study seeks to validate a comprehensive model of consumer acceptance in the context of mobile payment. It uses the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with constructs of security, trust, social influence, and self-...
Comments