skip to main content
10.1145/3512576.3512624acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Faculty Research Productivity using J48 Decision Tree Algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research productivity is seen as a shared issue present in most academic institutions, as research output requires skills, time and patience. In the Philippines, higher education institutions are mandated to undertake research and other similar investigations in various academic areas since they are one of the key institutions who play major role in the generation and dissemination of knowledge. This study generally aimed to come up with prediction model for faculty research productivity. Specifically, it tried to seek solutions to the following: identification of necessary attributes that have significant relationship to faculty research productivity, generate computational model for predicting research productivity of faculty through J48 Decision Tree Algorithm and validate the performance of computational model using confusion matrix analysis, precision, recall and f-measure. Results showed that attributes such as paper proposal, length of service, age, teaching loads, academic ranks, designation/s, civil status, academic qualification, sex and status of appointment has vital influence to research productivity of faculty. The computational model generated had an acceptable computed accuracy, precision, recall and f-measure results. Based on the data model performance results, the system can be used and can be implemented in an actual working system.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (18 July 2014). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20140715105656393Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandropoulos, S.S.N, Kotsiantis, S.B., & Vrahatis, M.N. (2019). Data preprocessing in predictive data mining. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 34(1), 1–33. doi:10.1017/S026988891800036XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Amjad A. (2016). Educational Data Mining and Students’ Performance Prediction. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(5), 2016. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070531Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arimoto, A. (2014). The teaching and research nexus in the third wave age. In J. C. Shin, A. Arimoto, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: Systems, activities, and rewards (pp. 15–33). Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bland, C.J., Seaquist, E., Pacala, J.T., Center, B., & Finstad, D. (2002). One school's strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Acad Med, 77(5), 368-376. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/0729436032000056571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brown, N. (2019). Issues in academic educational research: The impact of current issues on research activity [Doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University]. Research Online Institutional Repository. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/2166Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifton, C. (2019, December 20). Data mining. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/data-miningGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, Y., Lomas, L. & MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15-20. doi: 10.1108/09684880310462047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jameel, A.S., & Ahamad, A.R. (2020). Factors impacting research productivity of academic staff at the Iraqui higher education system. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 108-126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With applications (2nd ed.). Springer Nature.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mienye, I.D., Sun, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019). Prediction performance of improved decision tree-based algorithms: a review. 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials Processing and Manufacturing (SMPM 2019), 698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. McCombes, S. (2020, September 03). Descriptive research Design: Definition, methods and examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nguyen, Q., Klopper, C. & Smith, C. (2016) Affordances, barriers, and motivations: engagement in research activity by academics at the research-oriented university in Vietnam. Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 68-84, doi: 10.1080/23265507.2016.1170627Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Nurhudatiana, A., & Anggraeni, A. (2015). Decision tree modeling for predicting research productivity of university faculty members. 2015 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), 70-75. doi:10.1109/icodse.2015.7436974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Patel, H.H., & Prajapati, P. (2018). Study and analysis of decision tree based classification algorithms. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 6(10), 74-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Simisaye, A. O. (2019). A study of research productivity of the academic staff in research institutes in south-west Nigeria. Samaru Journal of Information Studies, 19(2), 75-99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stol, Klaas-Jan & Fitzgerald, Brian (2018). The ABC of Software Engineering Research. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng.Methodol. 27, 3, Article 11 (September 2018), 51 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241743Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wani, Z.A., Pandit, M.T., & Majeed, N. (2013). Research productivity of Indian Institute of Technology. International Journal of Library and Information, 5(7), pp. 216-224. doi: 10.5897/IJLIS2013.0369Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhao, Z.Z., & Yeom, D.S. (2020). Decision tree algorithm-based model and computer simulation for evaluating the effectiveness of physical education in universities. Complexity, 2020, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8868793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart City
    December 2021
    584 pages
    ISBN:9781450384971
    DOI:10.1145/3512576

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format