skip to main content
research-article

The Moral Orders of Matchmaking Work: Digitization of Matrimonial Services and the Future of Work

Published:07 April 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The digitization of matrimonial matchmaking has implications for work but also subjective notions of family, femininity, parent-child relations, community boundaries which this work relies on. This paper is based on qualitative, ethnographic fieldwork with matchmakers working with middle-class, upper-caste Hindu and Parsi communities in metropolitan India and offering services alongside, or as an alternative to the now widely used online matrimonial services. Through our fieldwork, we found all matchmakers engaged with digital technologies' involvement in the ongoing churn around modern choice. Matchmakers engaged with this wider social discourse through ideas of trust, autonomy and genealogy and in doing so they responded to and re/produced varying imaginations of the future of families, community, individuals. Our findings contribute to an understanding of the digitization of a service as well as make a case for widening the conceptual scope of the future of work debate currently dominated by economistic conceptions of work. By paying attention to the links between the productive and reproductive spheres of life, we follow labor and capital into the families and communities they reside in order to see the variety of moral projects capital can be invested in.

References

  1. Lisa Adkins. 2016. The Financialisation of Social Reproduction: Domestic Labour and Promissory Value. In The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency, Lisa Adkins and Maryanne Dever (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 129--145. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137495549_7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anuja Agrawal. 2015. Cyber-matchmaking among Indians: Re-arranging marriage and doing 'kin work'. South Asian Popular Culture 13, 1 (2015), 15--30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2015.1024591 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2015.1024591Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. B. R. Ambedkar. 1917. Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development. XLI (1917).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji) Ambedkar and (editor.) Rege, Sharmila. 2013. Against the madness of Manu : B.R. Ambedkar's writings on Brahmanical patriarchy. Navayana Publishing Pvt. Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Morgan G. Ames. 2015. Charismatic Technology. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (CA '15). Aarhus University Press, 109--120. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Seyram Avle, Julie Hui, Silvia Lindtner, and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2019. Additional Labors of the Entrepreneurial Self. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael Baas. 2009. The IT Caste: Love and Arranged Marriages in the IT Industry of Bangalore. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 32, 2 (2009), 285--307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856400903049531Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ayman Bajnaid and Yeslam Al-Saggaf. 2017. Impression Formation on Matrimonial Sites. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) (OZCHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77--86. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3152780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Isabelle Bakker and Stephen Gill. 2003. Power, Production and Social Reproduction: Human In/security in the Global Political Economy. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522404Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Aaron Bastani. 2019. Fully automated luxury communism : a manifesto. London ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karen Ho Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing Bear, Laura and Sylvia Yanagisako. 2015. . "Gens: A Feminist Manifesto for the Study of Capitalism." Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights,. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights (2015). https://culanth.org/fieldsights/gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalismGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jyothsna Latha Beliappa. 2013. Gender, Class and Reflexive Modernity in India. Palgrave.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lucie Bernroider. 2018. "Single female tenants in South Delhi -- gender, class and morality in a globalizing city". Gender, Place & Culture 25, 5 (2018), 758--774. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1428535 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1428535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Parul Bhandari. 2017. Pre-marital Relationships and the Family in Modern India. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal (SAMAJ) 16 (2017), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4379Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wendy R. Boswell and Julie B. Olson-Buchanan. 2007. The Use of Communication Technologies After Hours: The Role of Work Attitudes and Work-Life Conflict. Journal of Management 33, 4 (2007), 592--610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302552 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kabita Chakraborty. 2012. Virtual mate-seeking in the urban slums of Kolkata, India. South Asian Popular Culture 10, 2 (2012), 197--216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2012.682871 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2012.682871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Uma Chakravarti. 1993. Conceptualising Brahmanical Patriarchy in Early India. Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 28, Issue No. 14 (03 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leïla Choukroune and Parul Bhandari. 2018. Exploring Indian Modernities: Ideas and Practices. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--981--10--7557--5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalla Mariarosa Costa and Selma James. 1975. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Falling Wall Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Geert De Neve. 2016. The Economies of Love: Love marriage, kin support, and aspiration in a South Indian garment city. Modern Asian Studies 50, 4 (2016), 1220--1249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X14000742Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sara Dickey. 2012. The Pleasures and Anxieties of Being in the Middle: Emerging Middle-Class Identities in Urban South India. Modern Asian Studies 46, 3 (2012), 559--599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X11000333Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. DonnerHenrike. 2016. Doing it our Way: Love and marriage in Kolkata middle-class families. Modern Asian Studies 50, 4 (2016), 1147--1189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X15000347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Brooke Erin Duffy, Thomas Poell, and David B. Nieborg. 2019. Platform Practices in the Cultural Industries: Creativity, Labor, and Citizenship. Social Media + Society 5, 4 (2019), 2056305119879672. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi. 2015. From Arranged to Online: A Study of Courtship Culture in India. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi. 2014. Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines. First Monday 19 (06 2014). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i6.5331Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jenna Burrell Jed R. Brubaker Eric P.S. Baumer, Morgan G. Ames and Paul Dourish. 2015. Why study technology non-use? First Monday 20, 11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i11.6310Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Silvia Federici. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Leela Fernandes. 2006. India's New Middle Class: Democratic Politics in an Era of Economic Reform. University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsjgtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Eureka Foong, Nicholas Vincent, Brent Hecht, and Elizabeth M Gerber. 2018. Women (still) ask for less: Gender differences in hourly rate in an online labor marketplace. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Radhika Gajjala. 2003. South Asian digital diasporas and cyberfeminist webs: negotiating globalization, nation, gender and information technology design. Contemporary South Asia 12, 1 (2003), 41--56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958493032000123362 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/0958493032000123362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mark Graham, Isis Hjorth, and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2017. Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23, 2 (2017), 135--162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250 PMID: 28781494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mary L. Gray, Siddharth Suri, Syed Shoaib Ali, and Deepti Kulkarni. 2016. The Crowd is a Collaborative Network. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 134--147. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Melissa Gregg. 2011. Work's intimacy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Eszter Hargittai. 2018. The digital reproduction of inequality. In The Inequality Reader. Routledge, 660--670.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tapio Ikkala and Airi Lampinen. 2014. Defining the Price of Hospitality: Networked Hospitality Exchange via Airbnb. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW Companion '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--176. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Eva Illouz. 2007. Cold intimacies : the making of emotional capitalism / Eva Illouz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lilly C Irani and M Six Silberman. 2013. Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Azra Ismail and Neha Kumar. 2018. Engaging solidarity in data collection practices for community health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kylie Jarrett. 2015. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Kylie Jarrett. 2018. Laundering women's history: A feminist critique of the social factory. First Monday 23, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i3.8280Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alex Rosenblat Julia Ticona, Alexandra Mateescu. 2018. Beyond Disruption: How tech shapes labour across domestic work and ridehailing. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaishnav Kameswaran, Lindsey Cameron, and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2018. Support for Social and Cultural Capital Development in Real-time Ridesharing Services. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Ravinder Kaur and Priti Dhanda. 2013. Surfing for Spouses: Marriage Websites and the 'New' Indian Marriage? Orient Blackswan, New Delhi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jens Kjaerulf. 2015. Flexible capitalism: Exchange and ambiguity at work. Berghahn, Oxford. http://w01.leapsoastest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/24005/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2017. The Rise and Fall of Moral Labor in an Online Game Community. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 223--226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3026312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2017. The Rise and Fall of Moral Labor in an Online Game Community. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 223--226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3026312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Reena Kukreja. 2018. Caste and Cross-region Marriages in Haryana, India: Experience of Dalit cross-region brides in Jat households. Modern Asian Studies 52, 2 (2018), 492--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Neha Kumar, Naveena Karusala, Azra Ismail, Marisol Wong-Villacres, and Aditya Vishwanath. 2019. Engaging Feminist Solidarity for Comparative Research, Design, and Practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 167 (Nov. 2019), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359269Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Tania Lewis. 2017. Adventures in love, risk and romance: Navigating post-traditional social relations on Indian dating shows. European Journal of Cultural Studies 20, 1 (2017), 56--71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549416640551Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Rochona Majumdar. 2004. Looking for Brides and Grooms: Ghataks, Matrimonials, and the Marriage Market in Colonial Calcutta, circa 1875--1940. The Journal of Asian Studies 63, 4 (2004), 911--935. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4133195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Keir Marin. 2015. Afterword: Exchange and Corporate Forms Today. In Flexible capitalism : Exchange and ambiguity at work, Jens Kjaerulf (Ed.). Berghahn, Oxford, 261--76. http://w01.leapsoastest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/24005/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Melissa Mazmanian and Ingrid Erickson. 2014. The Product of Availability: Understanding the Economic Underpinnings of Constant Connectivity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 763--772. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Apurv Mehra, Udayan Tandon, Sambhav Satija, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. Prayana: Intermediated Financial Management in Resource-Constrained Settings. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article D104, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186504Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The heart work of Wikipedia: Gendered, emotional labor in the world's largest online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 207--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Madhurima Mukhopadhyay. 2012. Matchmakers and Intermediation: Marriage in Contemporary Kolkata. Economic and Political Weekly 47, 43 (2012), 90--99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41720304Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Kathryn M. Neckerman and Joleen Kirschenman. 1991. Hiring Strategies, Racial Bias, and Inner-City Workers. Social Problems 38, 4 (1991), 433--447. http://www.jstor.org/stable/800563Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Patrick Neveling. 2015. Flexible capitalism and transactional orders in colonial and postcolonial Mauritius: A post-occidentalist view. In Flexible capitalism : Exchange and ambiguity at work, Jens Kjaerulf (Ed.). Berghahn, Oxford, 207--234. http://w01.leapsoastest.da.ulcc.ac.uk/24005/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Cecilia NG and Swasti Mitter. 2005. Gender and the Digital Economy: Perspectives from the Developing World. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132103622Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Borke Obada-Obieh and Anil Somayaji. 2017. Can I Believe You?: Establishing Trust in Computer Mediated Introductions. In Proceedings of the 2017 New Security Paradigms Workshop (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (NSPW 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 94--106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171533.3171544Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Paulette Olson. 1990. The Persistence of Occupational Segregation: A Critique of Its Theoretical Underpinnings. Journal of Economic Issues 24, 1 (1990), 161--171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1990.11505006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze, Paul N Edwards, and Christian Sandvig. 2018. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20, 1 (2018), 293--310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Ujithra Ponniah. 2017. Reproducing Elite Lives: Women in Aggarwal Family Businesses. (2017). https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4280Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Gary W. Pritchard, Pam Briggs, John Vines, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. How to Drive a London Bus: Measuring Performance in a Mobile and Remote Workplace. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1885--1894. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Smitha Radhakrishnan. 2009. Professional Women, Good Families: Respectable Femininity and the Cultural Politics of a "New" India. Qualitative Sociology 32 (06 2009), 195--212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-009--9125--5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ashwin Rajadesingan, Ramaswami Mahalingam, and David Jurgens. 2019. Smart, Responsible, and Upper Caste Only: Measuring Caste Attitudes through Large-Scale Analysis of Matrimonial Profiles. CoRR abs/1904.04176 (2019). arXiv:1904.04176 http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.04176Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Noopur Raval and Joyojeet Pal. 2019. Making a ?Pro": ?professionalism' after platforms in beauty-work. In Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 175 (CSCW '19). ACM, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359277Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Tridip Ray, Arka Roy Chaudhari, and Komal Sahai. 2017. Whose Education Matters? An Analysis Of Inter Caste Marriages In India. Discussion Papers. Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:alo:isipdp:17-05Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Kjeld Schmidt. 2011. The Concept of "Work' in CSCW. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 20, 4--5 (Oct. 2011), 341--401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011--9146-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Becca Schwartz and Gina Neff. 2019. The gendered affordances of Craigslist "new-in-town girls wanted" ads. new media & society 21, 11--12 (2019), 2404--2421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Vishal Sharma, Bonnie Nardi, Juliet Norton, and A. M. Tsaasan. 2019. Towards Safe Spaces Online: A Study of Indian Matrimonial Websites. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2019, David Lamas, Fernando Loizides, Lennart Nacke, Helen Petrie, Marco Winckler, and Panayiotis Zaphiris (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 43--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams. 2015. Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. Verso. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16935/ © Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Jim Stanford. 2017. The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28 (08 2017), 103530461772430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617724303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Fumie Kumagai Stella R. Quah. 2015. Dating and courtship. Routledge, Chapter chapter7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881706.ch7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. David James Strohl. 2019. Love jihad in India's moral imaginaries: Religion, kinship, and citizenship in late liberalism. Contemporary South Asia 27, 1 (2019), 27--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Sowjanya Tamalapakula. 2019. The Politics of Inter-caste Marriage among Dalits in India: The Political as Personal. Asian Survey 59, 2 (2019), 315--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Fritzi-Marie Titzmann. [n.d.]. Mediatisation and Social Change- The Indian Online Matrimonial Market as a New Field of Research. Frank Timme, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Fritzi-Marie Titzmann. 2015. Matchmaking 2.0. The Representation of Women and Female Agency in the Indian Online Matrimonial Market. Internationales Asienforum 42 (2015), 239--56. https://doi.org/10.11588/iaf.2011.42.153Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Niels van Doorn. 2017. Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the 'on-demand' economy. Information, Communication & Society 20, 6 (2017), 898--914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Judy Wajcman. 1991. Technology as Masculine Culture. In Feminism Confronts Technology. Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Doug Zytko, Sukeshini Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2015. Frustrations with Pursuing Casual Encounters through Online Dating. 1935--1940. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732905Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Doug Zytko, Sukeshini Grandhi, and Quentin Jones. 2016. Online Dating Coaches' User Evaluation Strategies. 1337--1343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892482Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Moral Orders of Matchmaking Work: Digitization of Matrimonial Services and the Future of Work

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW1
        CSCW1
        April 2022
        2511 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3530837
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 April 2022
        Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue CSCW1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader