skip to main content
research-article

The Work of Infrastructural Bricoleurs in Building Civic Data Dashboards

Published:07 April 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Historic Westside Universities Alliance Data Dashboard was created to meet the data equity needs of a group of resource-constrained communities in the Westside neighborhoods of Atlanta. We observed the development of this dashboard by participating as ethnographers and developers of its public safety module. Our ethnography and subsequent situational analysis of the dashboard's infrastructuring process led us to the work that individual stakeholders do in bringing such a dashboard to fruition. These stakeholders, whom we call infrastructural bricoleurs, operate through principles of situated knowledge, partial perspectives, limited power, and located accountability. Our analysis, which builds on concepts of infrastructures, bricolage, and feminist principles of technology design, helps us add further specificity to the work that infrastructural bricoleurs need to do when building civic data dashboards with resource constrained communities. Our findings benefit other researchers studying data infrastructures as well as administrators and practitioners within programs like DSSG (Data Science for Social Good) who are interested in building data infrastructures under similar constraints.

References

  1. Shana Agid. 2018. "Dismantle, change, build': Designing abolition at the intersections of local, large-scale, and imagined infrastructures. Design Studies, Vol. 59 (2018), 95--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maryam Ali and Savita Bailur. 2007. The challenge of "sustainability" in ICT4D-Is bricolage the answer. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on social implications of computers in developing countries. Citeseer, 54--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Karen Barad. 1998. Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: a journal of feminist cultural studies, Vol. 10, 2 (1998), 87--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Christina Björkman, Pirjo Elovaara, and Lena Trojer. 2007. Feminist technoscience rearranging in the black box of information technology. In Gender Designs IT. Springer, 79--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeanette Blomberg and Mark Burrel. 2009. An ethnographic approach to design. In Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press, 87--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Molly Bloom. 2016. Atlanta school district to consider closing more schools. https://www.ajc.com/news/local-education/atlanta-school-district-consider-closing-more-schools/4DjXfq13X6BADf1WZrKzQM/?fbclid=IwAR1DDsWjOukRzWoidw2UGSsonn5u1UKZPJ2yBLB446_SNIGai4BAJpjshgo Retrieved Feb 17, 2022 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Geoffrey C Bowker. 1996. The history of information infrastructures: The case of the international classification of diseases. Information processing & management, Vol. 32, 1 (1996), 49--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Geoffrey C Bowker, C Geoffrey, W Bernard Carlson, et al. 1994. Science on the run: Information management and industrial geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920--1940 .MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Danah Boyd and Kate Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, Vol. 15, 5 (2012), 662--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Monika Büscher, Satinder Gill, Preben Mogensen, and Dan Shapiro. 2001. Landscapes of practice: Bricolage as a method for situated design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 10, 1 (2001), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Claudio Ciborra. 2002. The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems: Challenging the wisdom of systems .OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Adele E Clarke. 2003. Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic interaction, Vol. 26, 4 (2003), 553--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Adele E Clarke. 2015. From Grounded Theory to Situational Analysis. What's New? Why? How? In Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory, Adele E Clarke, Carrie Friese, and Rachel Washburn (Eds.). Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 84--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Adele E Clarke, Carrie Friese, and Rachel Washburn. 2015. Introducing Situational Analysis. In Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory, Adele E Clarke, Carrie Friese, and Rachel Washburn (Eds.). Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 11--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2018. Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. Proceedings of the Design Research Society (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kate Crawford, Mary L Gray, and Kate Miltner. 2014. Big Data| critiquing Big Data: Politics, ethics, epistemology| special section introduction. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 8 (2014), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Anderson, Daniel Lambton-Howard, Tom Nappey, Patrick Olivier, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Alexander Wilson, and Pete Wright. 2019. Infrastructuring public service transformation: Creating collaborative spaces between communities and institutions through HCI research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 26, 3 (2019), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Craig M Dalton, Linnet Taylor, and Jim Thatcher. 2016. Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society, Vol. 3, 1 (2016), 2053951716648346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christopher A Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 43, 2 (2013), 241--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data feminism .MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Carl DiSalvo. 2015. Adversarial design .Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 656--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 541--550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. John Eck, Spencer Chainey, James Cameron, and Ronald Wilson. 2005. Mapping crime: Understanding Hot Spots. Technical Report. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/209393.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Paul N Edwards. 2013. Knowledge infrastructures: Intellectual frameworks and research challenges. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ingrid Erickson and Steven Sawyer. 2019. Infrastructuring as Bricolage: Thinking Like a Contemporary Knowledge Worker. In Thinking Infrastructures. Emerald Publishing Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Amy Gonzales. 2017. Technology maintenance: a new frame for studying poverty and marginalization. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 289--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ole Hanseth and Eric Monteiro. 1998. Understanding information infrastructure. Unpublished Manuscript, Retrieved on 6th September from http://heim. ifi. uio. no/ oleha/Publications/bok. pdf (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Donna J Haraway. 1988. 1991. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (1988), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ira Harkavy. 2006. The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, citizenship and social justice, Vol. 1, 1 (2006), 5--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jina Huh, Lisa P Nathan, Six Silberman, Eli Blevis, Bill Tomlinson, Phoebe Sengers, and Daniela Busse. 2010. Examining appropriation, re-use, and maintenance for sustainability. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4457--4460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Steven J Jackson, Alex Pompe, and Gabriel Krieshok. 2012. Repair worlds: maintenance, repair, and ICT for development in rural Namibia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 107--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Helena Karasti. 2014. Infrastructuring in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1. 141--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Helena Karasti, Karen S Baker, and Eija Halkola. 2006. Enriching the notion of data curation in e-science: data managing and information infrastructuring in the long term ecological research (LTER) network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 15, 4 (2006), 321--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Helena Karasti and Jeanette Blomberg. 2018. Studying infrastructuring ethnographically. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 27, 2 (2018), 233--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Helena Karasti and Anna-Liisa Syrjanen. 2004. Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices-Volume 1. 20--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Rob Kitchin and Tracey Lauriault. 2014. Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Rob Kitchin, Tracey P Lauriault, and Gavin McArdle. 2015. Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, Vol. 2, 1 (2015), 6--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rob Kitchin and Gavin McArdle. 2017. Urban data and city dashboards: Six key issues. In Data and the City. Routledge, 111--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthias Korn, Wolfgang Reißmann, Tobias Röhl, and David Sittler. 2019. Infrastructuring publics: A research perspective. Infrastructuring Publics (2019), 11--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Kevin M Kruse. 2019. What does a traffic jam in Atlanta have to do with segregation? Quite a lot. New York Times (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christopher A Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the gate: Gaining access, building rapport, and co-constructing community-based research. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 1348--1358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Suresh K Lodha and Arvind K Verma. 2000. Spatio-temporal visualization of urban crimes on a GIS grid. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems. 174--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thomas Ludwig, Volkmar Pipek, and Peter Tolmie. 2018. Designing for collaborative infrastructuring: Supporting resonance activities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Claude Lvi-Strauss. 1966. The savage mind .University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ezio Manzini. 2015. Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation .MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. S Mattern. 2014. Interfacing urban intelligence. Places.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Gavin McArdle and Rob Kitchin. 2016. The Dublin Dashboard: Design and development of a real-time analytical urban dashboard. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Katie O'Connell, Yeji Lee, Firaz Peer, Shawn M Staudaher, Alex Godwin, Mackenzie Madden, and Ellen Zegura. 2016. Making public safety data accessible in the westside Atlanta data dashboard. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09756 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Neil Pollock and Robin Williams. 2008. Software and organisations: The biography of the enterprise-wide system or how SAP conquered the world .Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Sebastian Prost, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Jane Midgley, Graeme Heron, Kahina Meziant, and Clara Crivellaro. 2019. Infrastructuring food democracy: The formation of a local food hub in the context of socio-economic deprivation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. David Ribes. 2014. Ethnography of scaling, or, how to a fit a national research infrastructure in the room. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 158--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Jennifer A Rode. 2011. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 123--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Daniela K Rosner, Steven J Jackson, Garnet Hertz, Lara Houston, and Nimmi Rangaswamy. 2013. Reclaiming repair: Maintenance and mending as methods for design. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3311--3314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Richard Rottenburg, Sally E Merry, Sung-Joon Park, and Johanna Mugler. 2015. The world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification .Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rachel Boba Santos. 2016. Crime analysis with crime mapping .Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Steve Sawyer, Ingrid Erickson, and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2019. Infrastructural Competence. In Digital STS Handbook, David Ribes and Janet Vertesi (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Princeton, NJ. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77mp9.22Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Susan Star and Geoffrey Bowker. 2002. How to Infrastructure. In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, Leah A. Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone (Eds.). SAGE Publications, Ltd, London, 151--162. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245.n12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American behavioral scientist, Vol. 43, 3 (1999), 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information systems research, Vol. 7, 1 (1996), 111--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian journal of information systems, Vol. 14, 2 (2002), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Donna R Tabangin, Jacqueline C Flores, and Nelson F Emperador. 2010. Investigating crime hotspot places and their implication to urban environmental design: a geographic visualization and data mining approach. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, Vol. 5, 4 (2010), 210--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Nick Taylor, Keith Cheverst, Peter Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1549--1558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1992. Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 11, 1 (1992), 3--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Anna Vallgårda and Ylva Fernaeus. 2015. Interaction design as a bricolage practice. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. 173--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Janet Vertesi. 2014. Seamful spaces: Heterogeneous infrastructures in interaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 39, 2 (2014), 264--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2018. Infrastructuring the solidarity economy: Unpacking strategies and tactics in designing social innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Keith Whitney. 2011. The Bluff: Atlanta's forgotten community. http://downtown.11alive.com/news/news/88834-bluff-atlantas-forgotten-communityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Robin Williams and Neil Pollock. 2012. Research commentary-moving beyond the single site implementation study: how (and why) we should study the biography of packaged enterprise solutions. Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, 1 (2012), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Work of Infrastructural Bricoleurs in Building Civic Data Dashboards

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader