ABSTRACT
The recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia has seen the need for immediate communication—one that brings with it new civic considerations for structuring social media platforms. On February 23, the “2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine” Wikipedia page was created as its own article, formerly part of the “2021-2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis.” Starting with seven sections and 112 references, the page expanded 14 sections and nearly 600 references in the span of two weeks. With this emerging situation, previously codified editing roles, such as that of the vandal fighter, adapted to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving situation with fast-paced contributions from a globally distributed network of Wikipedia editors. In this paper, we argue that the vandal fighter role evoked self-expression, or individual personal decisions, expertise, and actions, as well as underlying norms of Wikipedia to coordinate action during this event. Further, we propose that this coordination is a form of connective intelligence, whereby editors connect with others toward a common goal and selectively share self-expressions when salient to the actions of the group.
- Welser, Howard T., Dan Cosley, Gueorgi Kossinets, Austin Lin, Fedor Dokshin, Geri Gay, and Marc Smith. 2011. Finding social roles in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (Feb 2011), 122-129.Google Scholar
- Diyi Yang, Aaron Halfaker, Robert Kraut, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Who did what: Editor role identification in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the Tenth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Web and Social Media, 446-455.Google Scholar
- Larry Sanger. 2005. The early history of Nupedia and Wikipedia: a memoir. Open sources, 2, 307-338.Google Scholar
- Jim Giles. 2005. Internet Encyclopedias go head to head, Nature, (438)7070 (Dec 2005), 900-901.Google Scholar
- Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu. 2018. Do experts or crowd-based models produce more bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia. MIS Quarterly, 42(3) (Sep 2018), 945–959.Google Scholar
- Cheng-Yu Lai and Heng-Li Yang. 2014. The reasons why people continue editing Wikipedia content – task value confirmation perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(12) (Dec 2014), 1371–1382.Google Scholar
- Florian Lemmerich, Diego Sáez-Trumper, Robert West, and Leila Zia. 2019. Why the world reads Wikipedia: Beyond English speakers. WSDM (Jan 2019), 618-626.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clay Shirky. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin.Google Scholar
- Jason Swarts. 2009. The collaborative construction of “fact” on Wikipedia. SIGDOC’09 (Oct 2009), 281-288.Google Scholar
- Brian Keegan, Darren Gergle, and Noshir Contractor. 2011. Hot off the Wiki: Dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia's coverage of the Tōhoku catastrophes. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration (Oct 2011), 105-113.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lester Faigley and Stephen Witte. 1981. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4) (Dec 1981), 400– 414.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johannes Daxenberger and Iryna Gurevych. 2012. A corpus-based study of edit categories in featured and non-featured Wikipedia articles. Proceedings of COLING 2012 (Dec 2012), 711–726.Google Scholar
- R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2010. The work of sustaining order in Wikipedia: The banning of a vandal. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Feb 2010), 117-126.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lei Zheng, Christopher M. Albano, Neev M. Vora, Feng Mai, and Jeffrey V. Nickerson. 2019. The roles bots play in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (Nov 2019), 1-20.Google Scholar
- “WP:REVERT.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Reverting. Accessed, May 2022.Google Scholar
- W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Devi Prasad. 2008. Content analysis. Research methods for social work, 5, 1-20.Google Scholar
- Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
- “WP:EDC.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_conflict. Accessed, May 2022.Google Scholar
- Daniel Lamprecht, Kristina Lerman, Denis Helic, and Markus Strohmaier. 2017. How the structure of Wikipedia articles influences user navigation. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 29-50.Google ScholarDigital Library
- “Template:Infobox military conflict” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_military_conflict. Accessed, May 2022.Google Scholar
- “WP:NPOV.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view. Accessed, May 2022.Google Scholar
- “WP:NOR.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research. Accessed, May 2022.Google Scholar
- Katherine Ehmann, Andrew Large, and Jamshid Beheshti. 2008. Collaboration in context: Comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday.Google Scholar
- Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Jesse Kriss, and Frank Van Ham. 2007. Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Jan 2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erhardt Graeff. 2019. Monitorial citizenship. In Hobbs, R & Mihailidis, P, eds., International encyclopedia of media literacy education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1-15.Google Scholar
- Nathaniel Tkacz. 2014. Wikipedia and the politics of openness. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Rachel Treisman. April 2022. Russia threatens to fine Wikipedia if it doesn't remove some details about the war. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090279187/russia-wikipedia-fineGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Wikipedia Editing as Connective Intelligence: Analyzing the Vandal Fighter Role in the “2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine” Wikipedia Article
Recommendations
How much is Wikipedia Lagging Behind News?
WebSci '15: Proceedings of the ACM Web Science ConferenceWikipedia, rich in entities and events, is an invaluable resource for various knowledge harvesting, extraction and mining tasks. Numerous resources like DBpedia, YAGO and other knowledge bases are based on extracting entity and event based knowledge ...
Learning multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia
We automatically create enormous, free and multilingual silver-standard training annotations for named entity recognition (ner) by exploiting the text and structure of Wikipedia. Most ner systems rely on statistical models of annotated data to identify ...
Evaluating Entity Linking with Wikipedia
Named Entity Linking (nel) grounds entity mentions to their corresponding node in a Knowledge Base (kb). Recently, a number of systems have been proposed for linking entity mentions in text to Wikipedia pages. Such systems typically search for candidate ...
Comments