skip to main content
10.1145/3513130.3558978acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Wikipedia Editing as Connective Intelligence: Analyzing the Vandal Fighter Role in the “2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine” Wikipedia Article

Published:06 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia has seen the need for immediate communication—one that brings with it new civic considerations for structuring social media platforms. On February 23, the “2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine” Wikipedia page was created as its own article, formerly part of the “2021-2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis.” Starting with seven sections and 112 references, the page expanded 14 sections and nearly 600 references in the span of two weeks. With this emerging situation, previously codified editing roles, such as that of the vandal fighter, adapted to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving situation with fast-paced contributions from a globally distributed network of Wikipedia editors. In this paper, we argue that the vandal fighter role evoked self-expression, or individual personal decisions, expertise, and actions, as well as underlying norms of Wikipedia to coordinate action during this event. Further, we propose that this coordination is a form of connective intelligence, whereby editors connect with others toward a common goal and selectively share self-expressions when salient to the actions of the group.

References

  1. Welser, Howard T., Dan Cosley, Gueorgi Kossinets, Austin Lin, Fedor Dokshin, Geri Gay, and Marc Smith. 2011. Finding social roles in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (Feb 2011), 122-129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Diyi Yang, Aaron Halfaker, Robert Kraut, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Who did what: Editor role identification in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the Tenth International Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Conference on Web and Social Media, 446-455.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Larry Sanger. 2005. The early history of Nupedia and Wikipedia: a memoir. Open sources, 2, 307-338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jim Giles. 2005. Internet Encyclopedias go head to head, Nature, (438)7070 (Dec 2005), 900-901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Shane Greenstein and Feng Zhu. 2018. Do experts or crowd-based models produce more bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia. MIS Quarterly, 42(3) (Sep 2018), 945–959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng-Yu Lai and Heng-Li Yang. 2014. The reasons why people continue editing Wikipedia content – task value confirmation perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(12) (Dec 2014), 1371–1382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Florian Lemmerich, Diego Sáez-Trumper, Robert West, and Leila Zia. 2019. Why the world reads Wikipedia: Beyond English speakers. WSDM (Jan 2019), 618-626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Clay Shirky. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jason Swarts. 2009. The collaborative construction of “fact” on Wikipedia. SIGDOC’09 (Oct 2009), 281-288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brian Keegan, Darren Gergle, and Noshir Contractor. 2011. Hot off the Wiki: Dynamics, practices, and structures in Wikipedia's coverage of the Tōhoku catastrophes. In Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration (Oct 2011), 105-113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lester Faigley and Stephen Witte. 1981. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4) (Dec 1981), 400– 414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Johannes Daxenberger and Iryna Gurevych. 2012. A corpus-based study of edit categories in featured and non-featured Wikipedia articles. Proceedings of COLING 2012 (Dec 2012), 711–726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2010. The work of sustaining order in Wikipedia: The banning of a vandal. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (Feb 2010), 117-126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lei Zheng, Christopher M. Albano, Neev M. Vora, Feng Mai, and Jeffrey V. Nickerson. 2019. The roles bots play in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (Nov 2019), 1-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. “WP:REVERT.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Reverting. Accessed, May 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Devi Prasad. 2008. Content analysis. Research methods for social work, 5, 1-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. “WP:EDC.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_conflict. Accessed, May 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Daniel Lamprecht, Kristina Lerman, Denis Helic, and Markus Strohmaier. 2017. How the structure of Wikipedia articles influences user navigation. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 29-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. “Template:Infobox military conflict” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_military_conflict. Accessed, May 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. “WP:NPOV.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view. Accessed, May 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. “WP:NOR.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research. Accessed, May 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Katherine Ehmann, Andrew Large, and Jamshid Beheshti. 2008. Collaboration in context: Comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Jesse Kriss, and Frank Van Ham. 2007. Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Jan 2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Erhardt Graeff. 2019. Monitorial citizenship. In Hobbs, R & Mihailidis, P, eds., International encyclopedia of media literacy education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathaniel Tkacz. 2014. Wikipedia and the politics of openness. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rachel Treisman. April 2022. Russia threatens to fine Wikipedia if it doesn't remove some details about the war. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090279187/russia-wikipedia-fineGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Wikipedia Editing as Connective Intelligence: Analyzing the Vandal Fighter Role in the “2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine” Wikipedia Article

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '22: Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2022
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450392464
      DOI:10.1145/3513130

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format