skip to main content
10.1145/3513130.3558981acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data Visualization Design Strategies for Promoting Exercise Motivation in Self-Tracking Applications

Published:06 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In self-tracking applications, data visualizations play a fundamental role in delivering efficient information and creating personalized user experiences. Literature consistently indicates that data visualization is a powerful tool to make data persuasive and improve motivation. However, how to leverage different data visualizations to boost motivation remains largely unknown. In this study, the researcher explores the effects of different data visualizations on user motivation within self-tracking mobile applications. Through design space analysis and semi-structured interviews, the researcher defines a set of design factors that impact users’ exercise motivation at different levels of exercise adoption. Based on these factors, the researcher delivers a set of practical design suggestions for design practitioners and people who create visualizations for large data sets.

References

  1. Sharma, A., Madaan, V., and Petty, F. D. 2006. Exercise for mental health. Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, 8(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.v08n0208a Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Parker, K., Uddin, R., Ridgers, N. D., Brown, H., Veitch, J., Salmon, J., Timperio, A., Sahlqvist, S., Cassar, S., Toffoletti, K., Maddison, R., and Arundell, L. 2021. The Use of Digital Platforms for Adults' and Adolescents' Physical Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Our Life at Home): Survey Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(2), e23389. https://doi.org/10.2196/23389 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Feng, S., Mäntymäki, M., Dhir, A., and Salmela, H. 2021. How Self-tracking and the Quantified Self Promote Health and Well-being: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9): e25171. doi: 10.2196/25171 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Budd, J., Miller, B.S., Manning, E.M. 2020. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat Med 26, 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sullivan, A. N., and Lachman, M. E. 2017. Behavior Change with Fitness Technology in Sedentary Adults: A Review of the Evidence for Increasing Physical Activity. Frontiers in public health, 4, 289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kosara, R., Cohen, S., Cukier, J., and Wattenberg, M. 2009. Panel: Changing the world with visualization. In IEEE Visualization Conference Compendium. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mason, S., and Azzam, T. 2019. In Need of an Attitude Adjustment? The Role of Data Visualization in Attitude Change and Evaluation Influence. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018778808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kostelnick, C., 2008. "The Visual Rhetoric of Data Displays: The Conundrum of Clarity*," in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 116-130, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2007.914869Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pandey, A. V., Manivannan, A., Nov, O., Satterthwaite, M., and Bertini, E. 2014. The persuasive power of data visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 20(12), 2211-2220. 31 Dec. 2014. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346419Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. science, 211(4481), 453-458. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. King, D., Greaves, F., Exeter, C., and Darzi, A. 2013. ‘Gamification’: influencing health behaviours with games. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 106(3), 76-8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Card, Stuart K., Mackinlay, Jock., and Shneiderman, Ben., 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sorapure, Madeleine., 2019. Text, Image, Data, Interaction: Understanding Information Visualization. Computers and Composition, Volume 54. ISSN 8755-4615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102519.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ware, C. 2012. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol.9 No.7. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Few, S. 2009. Now You See It: Simple Visualization Techniques for Quantitative Analysis (1st. ed.). Analytics Press, Oakland, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, R. C., and Mayer, R. E. 2003. e-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bilbokaite, R. 2015. Effects of computer based visualization on students' cognitive processes in education process. Society Integration Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, doi: 10.17770/sie2015vol4.417Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., Van Ham, F., Kriss, J., and McKeon, M., 2007. "ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale," in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1121-1128, Nov.-Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70577Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dörk, M., Feng, P., Collins, C., and Carpendale, S. 2013. Critical InfoVis: exploring the politics of visualization. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2189-2198).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dick, M. 2013. Interactive Infographics and News Values. Digital Journalism. (Ahead-of-print), pp.1-17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. A. Welhausen. 2002. "Precarious Data: Crack, Opioids, and Enacting a Social Justice Ethic in Data Visualization Practice," in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 50-69, March 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2022.3144826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. C. Lauer and S. O'Brien. 2020. "How People Are Influenced by Deceptive Tactics in Everyday Charts and Graphs," in IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 327-340, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2020.3032053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lambrecht, K. 2021. Tracking the Differentiation of Risk: The Impact of Subject Framing in CDC Communication Regarding COVID-19. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 35(1), 94-100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Richards, D. 2016. Helping Local Residents Make Informed Decisions with Interactive Risk Visualization Tools. SIGDOC ’16: The 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication Proceedings. New York: ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á., Hernán-Losada, I., and Paredes-Velasco, M. 2017. Evaluating the effect of program visualization on student motivation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(3), 238-245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Park, S., Bakemeier, B., Flaxman, A., and Schultz, M. 2014. Impact of data visualization on decision-making and its implications for public health practice: a systematic literature review. Informatics for Health and Social Care, https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1982949Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Eberhard, K. 2021. The effects of visualization on judgment and decision-making: a systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hullman, J., and Diakopoulos, N. 2011. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231-2240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. 2008. Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 3, p. 182-185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhi & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11ó39). Heidelberg: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. 2017. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. 2012. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22; 9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78. PMID: 22726453; PMCID: PMC3441783.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwarzer, Ralf. 2003. On the Assessment and Analysis of Variables in the Health Action Process Approach: Conducting an Investigation. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/gesund/hapa_web.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Chiu, C.Y. 2011. The health action process approach as a motivational model for physical activity self-management for people with multiple sclerosis: a path analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology. Vol.56., p.171-181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Schwarzer, R. 2008. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Schwarzer, R., Lippke, S., and Luszczynska, A. 2011. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: The health action process approach (HAPA). Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 161-170. doi: 10.1037/a0024509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Eberhart, C. 2014. A statistical analysis of the apple app store. http://blog.scottlogic.com/2014/03/20/app-store-analysis.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Erica L. Olmsted-Hawala, Elizabeth D. Murphy, Sam Hawala, and Kathleen T. Ashenfelter. 2010. Think-aloud protocols: a comparison of three think-aloud protocols for use in testing data-dissemination web sites for usability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2381–2390. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Levin, I. P., and Gaeth, G. J. 1988. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1086/209174Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Neff, G., and Nafus, D. 2016. Title of work: Making sense of data. The Self-Tracking. The MIT Press. 70-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Choe, E. K., Lee, B., and Schraefel, M. C. 2015. Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers' personal data presentations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. P.28-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Cairo, A. 2013. The functional art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization. New Riders Publishing, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Azevedo, R., Millar, G. C., Taub, M., Mudrick, N., Bradbury, A. E., and Price, M. J. 2017. Using data visualizations to foster emotion regulation during self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: a conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Data Visualization Design Strategies for Promoting Exercise Motivation in Self-Tracking Applications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SIGDOC '22: Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
          October 2022
          187 pages
          ISBN:9781450392464
          DOI:10.1145/3513130

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 October 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)175
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format