skip to main content
10.1145/3513130.3558995acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

Developing Workplace-Ready Engineers: New Engineers' Experiences Learning Workplace Communication Competencies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The transition from student to engineer requires individuals to adapt to new workplace communication practices. Using interview data from a focus group of early-career engineers, we examine entry-level employees’ narrative experiences with workplace communication to describe what new engineers know about effective communication in their workplace and how they come to know it. These engineers define effective communication as a reflection of personal identity and as a way to mitigate company liabilities. They cite observational experiences on-site as moments of instruction about how to communicate effectively at work.

References

  1. Judith Norback, Elke M. Leeds, and Garlie A. Forehand. 2009. Engineering Communication—Executive Perspectives on the Necessary Skills for Students. Int J of Modern Engineering, 10, 1 (Fall/Winter 2009), 11-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jeffery A. Donnell, Betsy M. Aller, Michael Alley, and April A. Kedrowicz. 2011. Why Industry Says that Engineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says. In Proceedings of the ASEE 118th Annual Conference and Exhibition. ASEE, Vancouver, BC, Paper ID 222453, 13 pages, https://peer.asee.org/18809Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lilian Maria de Souza Almeida, Kurt Henry Becker, and Idalis Villanueva. 2019. Understanding Industry's Expectations of Engineering Communication Skills. In Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exhibition. ASEE, Tampa, FL, Paper ID 24808, 20 pages, https://peer.asee.org/32343Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. James Trevelyan. 2019. Transitioning to engineering practice. Euro J of Engineering Ed, 44, 6 (November 2019), 821-837, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1681631Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Julie Dyke Ford, Marie Paretti, Susannah Howe, and Robin Ott. 2021. New Engineers’ Transfer of Communication Activities from School to Work. IEEE Trans Pro Comm, 64, 2 (June 2021), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019/2893393Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cark Moustakas. 2011. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David R. Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval, 27, 2 (June 2006), 237-246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Developing Workplace-Ready Engineers: New Engineers' Experiences Learning Workplace Communication Competencies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '22: Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2022
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450392464
      DOI:10.1145/3513130

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • technical-note
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format