skip to main content
10.1145/3513130.3559002acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Intersectional Feminism as a Theoretical Framework for Navigating Bias in the Technical Communication Workplace

Published:06 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This research project describes how I performed a targeted literature review of intersectional feminism research to develop a theoretical framework that technical and professional communication (TPC) scholars and practitioners can use to mitigate workplace bias. As a result, this study seeks to extend the application of feminist theory and expand TPC discussions centered on ethical implications and inclusive communication design.

References

  1. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosley, D. S. (1994). Feminist theory, audience analysis, and verbal and visual representation in a technical communication writing task. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259409364573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crenshaw, K. (2015). On Intersectionality: The Essential Writings of Kimberle Crenshaw. New Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, C. J. (2019). Feminist Rhetorical Practices in Digital Spaces. Computers and Composition, 52, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. De Hertogh, L. B., Lane, L., & Ouellette, J. (2019). “Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values in Three Decades of Computers and Composition. Computers and Composition, 51, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.11.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dias Canedo, E., Acco Tives, H., Bogo Marioti, M., Fagundes, F., & Siqueira de Cerqueira, J. A. (2019). Barriers Faced by Women in Software Development Projects. Information, 10(10), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fotaki, M., & Harding, N. (2017). Gender and the Organization: Women at Work in the 21st Century. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gurak, L. J., & Bayer, N. L. (1994). Making Gender Visible: Extending Feminist Critiques of Technology to Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(3), 257–270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Haas, A. M. (2012). Race, Rhetoric, and Technology: A Case Study of Decolonial Technical Communication Theory, Methodology, and Pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Halterman, C., Dutkiewicz, J., & Halterman, E. (1991). Men and Women on the Job: Gender Bias in Work Teams. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651991005004008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hancock, A.-M. (2016). Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hyrynsalmi, S., & Sutinen, E. (2019). The Role of Women Software Communities in Attracting More Women to the Software Industry. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792673Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jones, N. N. (2016). The Technical Communicator as Advocate: Integrating a Social Justice Approach in Technical Communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. LaDuc, L., & Goldrick-Jones, A. (1994). The Critical Eye, the Gendered Lens, and `Situated’ Insights – Feminist Contributions to Professional Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259409364570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lay, M. M. (1994). The Value of Gender Studies to Professional Communication Research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651994008001003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lin, Y.-W., & Besten, M. den. (2019). Gendered work culture in free/libre open source software development. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Maji, S., & Dixit, S. (2020). Gendered Processes and Women's Stunted Career Growth: An Exploratory Study of Female Software Engineers. The Qualitative Report, 8(25), 3067–3084.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Matheson, B., & Petersen, E. J. (2020). Tactics for Professional Legitimacy: An Apparent Feminist Analysis of Indian Women's Experiences in Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(4), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1659860Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Miller, C. R. (1979). A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/375964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nakamura, L. (2008). Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Abrams.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Petersen, E. J. (2019). The “reasonably bright girls”: Accessing agency in the technical communication workplace through interactional power. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1540724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Petersen, E. J., & Walton, R. (2018). Bridging Analysis and Action: How Feminist Scholarship Can Inform the Social Justice Turn. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(4), 416–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918780192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Risam, R. (2018). New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ritchie, J., & Ronald, K. (2001). Available Means: An Anthology of Women's Rhetoric(s). University of Pittsburgh Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Vardeman-Winter, J., & Place, K. (2017). Still a lily-white field of women: The state of workforce diversity in public relations practice and research | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Walton, R., Moore, K., & Jones, N. (2019). Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Intersectional Feminism as a Theoretical Framework for Navigating Bias in the Technical Communication Workplace

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '22: Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2022
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450392464
      DOI:10.1145/3513130

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format