skip to main content
10.1145/3513130.3559006acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

How to Become a Disability-Inclusive Communication Designer: Knowledge and Practices for Professional Development

Published:06 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study draws on an analysis of a range of texts to trace the learning ecologies which support disability-inclusive teaching, research, administration, and industry practice. As a means to increase our disciplinary and institutional capacity to foster inclusion, I seek to understand the processes through which disability-inclusive designers, environments, and institutions come to be.

References

  1. Laura Gonzales. 2018. Designing for intersectional, interdependent accessibility: A case study of multilingual technical content creation. Communication Design Quarterly 6, 4 (January 2019), 34-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3309589.3309593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Scott Graham 2017. Catalyzing transdisciplinarity: A systems ethnography of cancer–obesity comorbidity and risk coincidence. J. Qualitative Health Research 27, 6 (July 2016), 877-892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316656162Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Margaret Gutsell and Kathleen Hulgin. 2013. Supercrips Don't Fly: Technical Communication to Support Ordinary Lives of People With Disabilities. In Rhetorical Accessability: At the Intersection of Technical Communication and Disability Studies, Lisa Meloncon (ed.). Routledge, 83-93. DOI: https://doi-org.ezp1.lib.umn.edu/10.4324/9781315231501Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carl G. Herndl and Adela C. Licona. 2007. Shifting Agency: Agency, Kairos, and the Possibilities of Social Action. In Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations, Mark Zachry and Charlotte Thralls (ed.). Routledge, 133-154. DOI: 10.2190/CPIC7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sherena Huntsman, Jared S Colton, and Christopher Phillips. 2018. Cultivating virtuous course designers: Using technical communication to reimagine accessibility in higher education. Communication Design Quarterly 6, 4 (January 2019), 12-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3309589.3309591Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. International Association of Accessibility Professionals. Home page. Retrieved August 10, 2022 from https://www.accessibilityassociation.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. International Association of Accessibility Professionals. Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies Body of Knowledge (March 2020). Retrieved August 10, 2022 from https://accessibilityassociation.force.com/s/prepareforcpaccGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anthony Karcz. Our Accessibility Journey: Making Rise more accessible to everyone, one day at a time. Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://help.rise.com/en/articles/4471451-our-accessibility-journeyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenny Lay-Flurrie. 2018. Microsoft's Accessibility Journey: Education, Work and Life. (May 2018). Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://blogs.microsoft.com/accessibility/microsoft-accessibility-journey-march-2018/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Manuel Matuzović. 2018. My Accessibility Journey: What I've Learned So Far. (February 2018). Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://alistapart.com/article/my-accessibility-journey-what-ive-learned-so-far/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lisa Meloncon. 2018. Orienting access in our business and professional communication classrooms. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 81, 1 (January 2018), 34-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490617739885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Daniel P. Richards and Kristen G. Moore. 2018. Introduction. In Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication, Kristen R. Moore and Daniel P. Richards (ed.). Routledge, 1-20. DOI: https://doi-org.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/10.4324/9781351203074Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark Steadman. 2021. Starting Your Accessibility Journey: A Developers Guide. (February 2021). Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://dev.to/steady5063/starting-your-accessibility-journey-a-developers-guide-37o4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. U.S. Bank. How U.S. Bank built a world-class digital accessibility practice. (October 2021). Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://help.rise.com/en/articles/4471451-our-accessibility-journeyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rebecca Walton, Kristen R. Moore, Natasha N. Jones. 2019. Technical Communication after the Social Justice Turn (1st. ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi-org.ezp2.lib.umn.edu/10.4324/9780429198748Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Greg Wilson and Carl G. Herndl. 2007. Boundary objects as rhetorical exigence: Knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at Los Alamos National Laboratory. J. Business and Technical Communication, 21, 2, 129–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906297164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Remi Yergeau. 2020. Cassandra isn't doing the robot: On risky rhetorics and contagious autism. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 50, 3 (June 2020), 212-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1752132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. How to Become a Disability-Inclusive Communication Designer: Knowledge and Practices for Professional Development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '22: Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2022
      187 pages
      ISBN:9781450392464
      DOI:10.1145/3513130

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 October 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format