skip to main content
10.1145/3514197.3549684acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Public Access

Motivating health behavior change with a storytelling virtual agent

Published:06 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We developed a virtual agent that motivates church-going users to change their health behavior by telling existing cultural narratives that have high relevance with the counseling topic in an engaging way. We evaluated this agent in a between-subjects experiment where participants interacted with an agent that counseled them on nutrition either without a story, with a story but told in a neutral speech style, or with a story using dramatic delivery inspired by church sermons. We found that interaction with either one of the storytelling agents leads to a significantly greater change in confidence to engage in the target behavior of healthy eating than interacting with a non-storytelling agent, demonstrating the efficacy of stories in health counseling by virtual agents.

References

  1. Tom Baranowski, Kathleen B Watson, Christine Bachman, Janice C Baranowski, Karen W Cullen, Debbe Thompson, and Anna-Maria Siega Riz. 2010. Self efficacy for fruit, vegetable and water intakes: Expanded and abbreviated scales from item response modeling analyses. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 7, 1 (2010), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Justine Cassell, Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, and Timothy Bickmore. 2004. BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit. In Life-Like Characters: Tools, Affective Functions, and Applications, Helmut Prendinger and Mitsuru Ishizuka (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 163--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Herbert Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. James Paul Gee and Francois Grosjean. 1984. Empirical evidence for narrative structure. Cognitive Science 8, 1 (1984), 59--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Wael H Gomaa, Aly A Fahmy, et al. 2013. A survey of text similarity approaches. international journal of Computer Applications 68, 13 (2013), 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Diane J Litman and Rebecca J Passonneau. 1995. Combining multiple knowledge sources for discourse segmentation. arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9505025 (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jun Ma, Nancy M Betts, Tanya Horacek, Constance Georgiou, Adrienne White, and Susan Nitzke. 2002. The importance of decisional balance and self-efficacy in relation to stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes by young adults. American Journal of Health Promotion 16, 3 (2002), 157--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Renata K Martins and Daniel W McNeil. 2009. Review of motivational interviewing in promoting health behaviors. Clinical psychology review 29, 4 (2009), 283--293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Raúl Montaño, Francesc Alías, and Josep Ferrer. 2013. Prosodic analysis of storytelling discourse modes and narrative situations oriented to Text-to-Speech synthesis. In Eighth ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Seth Noar, C Benac, and M Harris. 2007. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 133 (2007), 673--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Miguel Oliveira. 2002. The role of pause occurrence and pause duration in the signaling of narrative structure. In International Conference for Natural Language Processing in Portugal. Springer, 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Miguel Oliveira Jr and Dóris AC Cunha. 2004. Prosody as marker of direct reported speech boundary. In Speech Prosody 2004, International Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Haddon W Robinson. 2014. Biblical preaching: The development and delivery of expository messages. Baker Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P Sunilkumar and Athira P Shaji. 2019. A survey on semantic similarity. In 2019 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control (ICAC3). IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marc Swerts and Ronald Geluykens. 1994. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and speech 37, 1 (1994), 21--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mariët Theune, Koen Meijs, Dirk Heylen, and Roeland Ordelman. 2006. Generating expressive speech for storytelling applications. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 14, 4 (2006), 1137--1144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jiapeng Wang and Yihong Dong. 2020. Measurement of text similarity: a survey. Information 11, 9 (2020), 421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Motivating health behavior change with a storytelling virtual agent

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IVA '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        September 2022
        234 pages
        ISBN:9781450392488
        DOI:10.1145/3514197
        • General Chairs:
        • Carlos Martinho,
        • João Dias,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Joana Campos,
        • Dirk Heylen

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 September 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        IVA '22 Paper Acceptance Rate21of51submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate53of196submissions,27%

        Upcoming Conference

        IVA '24
        ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        September 16 - 19, 2024
        GLASGOW , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader