ABSTRACT
The Data Management community has explored many options in recent years to improve our publication culture and review processes, ranging from innovative journal-conference hybrids that decouple publication from presentation, incorporating journal-style reviewing for conference-style papers, requesting code reproducibility and code/data availability, multiple submission deadlines in a year, new categories of papers, informal shepherding processes, guidelines for diversity and inclusion, automated COI check, and so on. This panel seeks to examine our many experiments, comparing them with other CS disciplines, and help determine (i) have our experiments worked? (ii) what has their impact been? and (iii) can we do better?
Index Terms
- Publication Culture and Review Processes in the Data Management Community: An Open Discussion
Recommendations
Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal
Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. Publication fees or article-processing charges (APC)s have become the predominant means for funding professional OA publishing. We ...
Funding Data from Publication Acknowledgments: Coverage, Uses, and Limitations
This article contributes to the development of methods for analysing research funding systems by exploring the robustness and comparability of emerging approaches to generate funding landscapes useful for policy making. We use a novel data set of ...
The "total cost of publication" in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions
As open-access OA publishing funded by article-processing charges APCs becomes more widely accepted, academic institutions need to be aware of the "total cost of publication" TCP, comprising subscription costs plus APCs and additional administration ...
Comments