Dhana A. Canoy
ABSTRACT
Early interest and appropriate experiences could foster interest in science, technology, engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for young children. Pre-service teacher preparation was one of the keys to cultivate the interest in STEM for future generation. With this, the current study determined Early Childhood Education (ECE) pre-service teachers’ aspects regarding STEM such as their belief, understanding, self-efficacy, and intention. Also, the association or correlation of STEM aspects were measured. As a result of multiple analyses, it was found out that they had very high STEM aspects and there was a positive association or correlation of the aspects. New conceptions of STEM were also constructed by almost half of the pre-service teachers. There was no significant gender difference found in their aspects regarding STEM. This finding implied that the ECE pre-service teachers who were mostly female had no gender bias in regards to possible integration of STEM in their own future classroom.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barak, M. (2014). Closing the gap between attitudes and perceptions about ICT enhanced learning among pre-service STEM teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 1–14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bergeron, L., & Gordon, M. (2017). Establishing a STEM pipeline: trends in male and female enrolment and performance in higher level secondary STEM courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 433–450.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bybee, R. (2013). The case of STEM education: challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press, Arlington.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Chen, Y.L., Huang, L.F., & Wu, P.C. (2021). Preservice Preschool Teachers’ Self-efficacy in and Need for STEM Education Professional Development: STEM Pedagogical Belief as a Mediator. Early Childhood Educ J. 49, 137–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01055-3Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
- Early Childhood STEM Working Group (2017), Early stem matters, providing high-quality stem experiences for all young learners: a policy report by the early childhood stem working group, Erikson Institute. DOI: http://d3lwefg3pyezlb.cloudfront.net/docs/Early_STEM_Matters_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar
- Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph, S. & Wright, Z. (2016). Men as Early Childhood Educators: Experiences and Perspectives of Two Male Prospective Teachers. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1), 213-219Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017). Examining elementary teachers’ engineering self-efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 52–62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kurup, P.M, Brown, M., Powell, G., & Li X. (2017). Future primary teachers’ beliefs, understandings and intentions to teach STEM, IAFOR Journal of Education, Volume 5 – Special Issue.Google Scholar
- Kurup, P.M, Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: based on platform of beliefs, understanding and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6:10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0164Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers’ decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152-164. DOI: https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/13_1/15.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Lin, K. & Williams, P. (2015). Taiwanese Preservice Teachers’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Integrating Intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 14, 1021-1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12–18.Google Scholar
- Morrison, J., Raab, F., & Ingram, D. (2009). Factors influencing elementary and secondary teachers' views on the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 384–403.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pasha-Zaidi, N., & Afari, E. (2016). Gender in STEM education: an exploratory study of student perceptions of math and science instructors in United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1215–1231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Plante, I., de la Sablonnière, R., Aronson, J. M., & Théorêt, M. (2013). Gender stereotype endorsement and achievement related outcomes: The role of competence beliefs and task values. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38 (3), 225–235. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roth, W.M., Bowen, G.M., & McGinn, M.K. (1999). Differences in graph related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. J Res Sci Teach, 36(9), 977–1019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peeters, J., Rohrmann, T. & Emilsen, K. (2015). Gender balance in ECEC: why is there little progress? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1043805Google Scholar
- Pendergast, E., Lieberman-Betz, R. G., & Vail, C. O. (2017). Attitudes and beliefs of prekindergarten teachers toward teaching science to young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(1), 43–52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perez, N. (2019). The lived experience of male early childhood teachers. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications. DOI: http://www.ijarp.org/online-papers-publishing/june2019.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Perkins Coppola, M. (2019). Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach engineering: Impact on self-efficacy and outcome expectancy.Google Scholar
- Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, C. L., & Ha, A. S. (2013). The theory of planned behavior: Predicting pre-service teachers' teaching behavior towards a constructivist approach. Sport, Education and Society, 18(2), 222-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.558572Google ScholarCross Ref
- Webb, D. L., & LoFaro, K. P. (2020). Sources of engineering teaching self-efficacy in a STEAM methods course for elementary preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 120(4), 209–219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yasar, S., Baker, D., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Krause, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers’ perceptions of engineers and familiarity with teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(3), 205–216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang, W., Wu, R., & Li, J. (2021). Development and validation of the STEM Teaching Self-efficacy Scale (STSS) for early childhood teachers. Current Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02074-yGoogle Scholar
Recommendations
Technology workshops by in-service teachers for pre-service teachers
SIGUCCS '01: Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User servicesThis project was an initiative through university courses to have graduate in-service teachers, who have learned the use of technology for classroom instruction, offer workshops to undergraduate pre-service teachers. The goals of the project were two-...
Computing MATTERS: building pathways to cyberinfrastructure
XSEDE '12: Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Bridging from the eXtreme to the campus and beyondAs we prepare students for the 21st century workforce, three of the most important skills for advancing modern mathematics and science are quantitative reasoning, computational thinking, and multi-scale modeling. Computing MATTERS: Pathways to ...
Surveying Chinese teachers' technological pedagogical STEM knowledge: a pilot validation of STEM-TPACK survey
As STEM education is increasingly drawing attention from different parts of the world, there is also an emerging call for STEM education to be synthesised with the TPACK framework for the purpose of teacher professional development. Unfortunately, teacher ...
Comments