Husni Mubarok
ABSTRACT
Insights on National Character Education are characters that become their identity, personality, mindset, and perspective. This study aims to analyze the factors that increase the insight of national character education in elementary school teachers. This article uses a structured literature review method. This article results from literature research using a structured literature review method. Using primary documents from directory of open access journals indexed journals and writings published in quality books published by national publishers and international publishers. Analysis results show that there are 3 non-cognitive factors that can improve the insight of national character education in elementary school teachers, namely policy socialization, communication, and motivation. There are three indicators to determine the success of the policy socialization factor, namely human resources, learning resources, disposition of policy implementers. There are also three indicators in determining the success of the communication factor, namely Credibility, Capability, Clarity, Sympathy; Enthusiasm. In the motivation factor, there are also four indicators, namely attention, confidence, relevance, and satisfaction. The leaders can give appreciation to teachers who have practiced national character education. The teacher also implements the policies that have been socialized by the principal well.
- A. Fawait, P. Setyosari, Sulthoni -, and S. Ulfa, “Identification of Factors Affecting of Character Education Program on High School Students’ Self-Regulation Skills,” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.17478/jegys.683165.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- T. Lickona, “Eleven principles of effective character education,” Journal of moral Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kolonel Inf Sammy Ferrijana, Dr. Basseng, M.Ed, and Triatmojo Sejati, ST, SH, M.Si, MODUL WAWASAN KEBANGSAAN DAN NILAI-NILAI DASAR BELA NEGARA. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia, 2019.Google Scholar
- P. R. Indonesia, “Kebijakan nasional pembangunan karakter bangsa tahun 2010-2025,” Jakarta: Pu-sat Kurikulum Balitbang Kemdiknas, 2010.Google Scholar
- Suwendi, “Makna dan Tantangan Perpres Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter,” Republika Online, Sep. 08, 2017. https://republika.co.id/share/ovwmpb396 (accessed Feb. 06, 2020).Google Scholar
- D. Ratnawati, “FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER HOLISTIK SISWA SMKN DI KOTA MALANG,” JTV, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.30738/jtvok.v3i2.363.Google Scholar
- E. Suarto, “FAKTOR-FAKYOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI DALAM PENANAMAN PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DI SEKOLAH TINGKAT PERTAMA DI KOTA PADANG,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 2, no. 1, 2017.Google Scholar
- N. Indarti and W. Paramita, “Kajian Literature: Pemetaan Riset Terkini dan Identifikasi Peluang,” Filosofi dan Metodologi Penelitian. BPFE-Yogyakarta, 2017.Google Scholar
- E. Ekowarni, “Pengembangan nilai-nilai luhur budi pekerti sebagai karakter bangsa,” Diambil dari http://belanegarari. wordpress. com/2009/08/25/pengembangannilai-nilai-luhur-budi-pekerti-sebagai-karakter-bangsa, Pada tanggal tanggal, vol. 26, 2010.Google Scholar
- H. Mubarok and E. Boeriswati, “The Impact of Perceptions of Policy Dissemination, Communication, and Motivation on National Character Knowledge of Primary School Teachers,” Journal of Educational and Social Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 128–128, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Aboulafia, “George Herbert Mead,” 2008.Google Scholar
- R. W. Mackay, “Conceptions of children and models of socialization,” in Studying The Social Worlds Of Children, Routledge, 2003, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
- Warni, “Evaluasi Kebijakan Pendidikan,” ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN, p. 93, 2018.Google Scholar
- D. Mulyana, “Pengantar ilmu komunikasi,” Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya, 2001.Google Scholar
- Dian Herdiana, “Sosialisasi Kebijakan Publik: Pengertian dan Konsep Dasar,” JURNAL ILMIAH WAWASAN INSAN AKADEMIK, vol. 1, no. 3, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Khoiruddin, “PERAN KOMUNIKASI DALAM PENDIDIKAN,” Tribakti, vol. 23, no. 1, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.33367/tribakti.v23i1.17.Google Scholar
- A. Khoiruddin, “Peran Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan,” Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, vol. 23, no. 1, 2012.Google Scholar
- M. S. Nurbani, “Pengertian Komunikasi Antarpribadi dan Kebudayaan sebagai Dasar Memahami Komunikasi Antarpribadi,” 2009.Google Scholar
- M. Demirel, D. Özmat, and I. Ö. Elgün, “Primary School Teachers’ Perceptions about Character Education.,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 1622–1633, 2016.Google Scholar
- B. Warsita, “Teknologi pembelajaran landasan dan aplikasinya,” 2008.Google Scholar
- A. Markarma, “Komunikasi dakwah efektif dalam perspektif alquran,” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 127–151, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. P. Handayani and T. I. Syahrini, “Peran Komunikasi Guru terhadap Motivasi Belajar Matematika,” Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019.Google Scholar
- W. Althof and M. W. Berkowitz, “Character and civic education as a source of moral motivation,” in Handbook of Moral Motivation, Brill Sense, 2013, pp. 567–583.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. A. Webster, “Increasing student motivation through teacher communication: Six essential skills every physical educator should master,” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 29–39, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. H. Ristianti, S. Danim, H. Winarto, and I. W. Dharmayana, “The Development Of Group Counselling Assessment Instruments,” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 8, no. 10, 2019.Google Scholar
- G. Yukl, K. N. Wexley, and J. D. Seymore, “Effectiveness of pay incentives under variable ratio and continuous reinforcement schedules.,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 56, no. 1, p. 19, 1972.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Ilyas, Determinan Distribusi Dokter Spesialis di Kota/Kabupaten Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University, 2006.Google Scholar
- S. Sardiman, “Masyarakat Madani, Muhammadiyah, dan Politik,” Informasi, vol. 28, no. 1, 2000.Google Scholar
- D. Kurniadin and I. Machali, “Manajemen Pendidikan Konsep,” 2011.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Computing education for secondary school teachers: A cooperative effort between computer scientist and educators
SIGCSE '81: Proceedings of the twelfth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationThe proposed program will establish a Computer Education Institute for computing, mathematics, and science teachers and supervisors in grade 7 to 12. The goals of the program are to: (1) provide teachers with a knowledge of programming in BASIC, and ...
Comments