skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516911acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pandemic Pedagogy in The Era of Digital Transformation

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study is to find the best pedagogical idea for learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. The writing method in this article is the Systematic Literature Review method which aims to describe, study, and analyze students' pandemic pedagogy due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the digital transformation era. The selection of sources based on several criteria, namely: 1) literature must be directly related to local wisdom, character education, and the 2013 curriculum; (2) search for related literature originating from the results of research reports, national journals, international journals, relevant books, scientific articles, and scientific data related to the study of this article; (3) limitation of the year of publication of the literature in the last two years (2020-2021). The findings of the research indicate that, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the growth of digital transformation in the online learning system accelerated in Indonesia. However, this online learning brings various negative impacts on the pedagogical aspects of students in elementary schools. During the Covid-19, teachers must comprehend and use pandemic pedagogy while conducting online learning for primary school pupils.

References

  1. M. Ghafari , “Ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 in Iran: challenges and signs of concern,” medRxiv, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. UNESCO, “COVID-19 educational disruption and response,” Available at, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Jamerson, M. Josh, and B. Joshua, “Student-Loan Debt Relief Offers Support to an Economy Battered by Coronavirus,” Wall Str. J., pp. 96–99, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Karp and M. McGowan, “Clear as mud: schools ask for online learning help as coronavirus policy confusion persists,” Guard., pp. 261–307, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Ngumbi, “Coronavirus closings: Are colleges helping their foreign, homeless and poor students,” USA Today, pp. 11–14, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. G. Dooley, A. Bandealy, and M. M. Tschudy, “Low-Income Children and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the US,” JAMA Pediatr., 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W. Feuer, “WHO officials warn health systems are'collapsing'under coronavirus:’This isn't just a bad flu season,” CNBC. Retrieved, pp. 3–23, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Barrett, “Coronavirus on campus: College students scramble to solve food insecurity and housing challenges,” CNBC. Retrieved, pp. 3–23, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Jordan, “Coronavirus outbreak shining an even brighter light on internet disparities in rural America,” Hill, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Jalali, S. Shahabi, K. Bagheri Lankarani, M. Kamali, and P. Mojgani, “COVID-19 and disabled people: perspectives from Iran,” Disabil. Soc., pp. 1–4, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. D. Y. Chin, J. F. Foley, I. L. Doto, C. R. Gravelle, and J. Weston, “Morbidity and mortality characteristics of Asian strain influenza,” Public Health Rep., vol. 75, no. 2, p. 149, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. C. Wheeler, L. M. Erhart, and M. L. Jehn, “Effect of school closure on the incidence of influenza among school-age children in Arizona,” Public Health Rep., vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 851–859, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Kawano and M. Kakehashi, “Substantial impact of school closure on the transmission dynamics during the pandemic flu H1N1-2009 in Oita, Japan,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. A. Jhung and D. I. Nelson, “Outbreaks of avian influenza A (H5N2),(H5N8), and (H5N1) among birds—United States, December 2014–January 2015,” 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Boccia, W. Ricciardi, and J. P. A. Ioannidis, “What other countries can learn from Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic,” JAMA Intern. Med., 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. O. I. Handarini and S. S. Wulandari, “Pembelajaran Daring Sebagai Upaya Study From Home (SFH) Selama Pandemi Covid 19,” J. Pendidik. Adm. Perkantoran, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 496–503, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Unicef, “COVID-19: Are children able to continue learning during school closures,” A Glob. Anal. Potential Reach Remote Learn. Polices Using Data from, vol. 100, p. 17, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. F. Pasani, R. Amelia, and Z. Hassanhassan, “Covid-19 impact in Indonesia's education sector: Challenges and strategy,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 12, no. 7 Special Issue, pp. 1722–1731, 2020, doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP7/20202281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. N. K. S. Astini, “Tantangan Dan Peluang Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Pembelajaran Online Masa Covid-19,” Cetta J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 241–255, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Arsendy, G. A. Sukoco, and R. E. Purba, “Riset dampak COVID-19: potret gap akses online ‘Belajar dari Rumah'dari 4 provinsi,” Retrieved from Conversat. Website https//theconversation. com/riset-dampak-covid-19-potret-gap-akses-online-belajar-dari-rumah-dari-4-provinsi-136534, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. M. Viner , “School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review,” Lancet Child Adolesc. Heal., 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. Trisnadewi and N. M. Muliani, “Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” COVID-19 Perspekt. Pendidik., p. 35, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Arsendy, C. J. Gunawan, N. Rarasati, and D. Suryadarma, “Teaching and Learning During School Closure: Lessons from Indonesia,” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. König, D. J. Jäger-Biela, and N. Glutsch, “Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 608–622, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. B. Biswas, S. K. Roy, and F. Roy, “Students Perception of Mobile Learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University Student Perspective,” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. W. Tamrat, “Enduring the impacts of COVID-19: experiences of the private higher education sector in Ethiopia,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 59–74, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. N. Gyimah, “Assessing technological innovation on education in the world of coronavirus (COVID-19),” Available SSRN 3670389, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Adnan and K. Anwar, “Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perspectives.,” Online Submiss., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. Ebert and C. H. C. Duarte, “Digital Transformation.,” IEEE Softw., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 16–21, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. T. Purcărea and A. Purcărea, “Services marketing in the era of disruption and digital transformation,” Rom. Econ. Bus. Rev., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 7–26, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Hadiono and R. C. N. Santi, “Menyongsong Transformasi Digital,” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. N. Ikwumelu, O. A. Oyibe, and E. C. Oketa, “Adaptive Teaching: An Invaluable Pedagogic Practice in Social Studies Education.,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 33, pp. 140–144, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. D. Dagger, V. Wade, and O. Conlan, “Developing Adaptive Pedagogy with the Adaptive Course Construction Toolkit (ACCT),” 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. B. Hand, A. Cavagnetto, Y.-C. Chen, and S. Park, “Moving past curricula and strategies: Language and the development of adaptive pedagogy for immersive learning environments,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 223–241, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. C. B. Rippé, S. Weisfeld-Spolter, Y. Yurova, and A. Kemp, “Pandemic Pedagogy for the New Normal: Fostering Perceived Control During COVID-19,” J. Mark. Educ., p. 0273475320987287, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. G. Hage, “Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality,” Anthropol. Theory, vol. 5, pp. 463–475, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. R. Schwartzman, “Performing pandemic pedagogy,” Commun. Educ., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 502–517, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. N. E. Mahaye, “The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education: navigating forward the pedagogy of blended learning,” Res. online, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. S. E. Juliansyah Noor, Metodologi Penelitian: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi & Karya Ilmiah. Prenada Media, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. E. Gummesson, C. Mele, F. Polese, M. Galvagno, and D. Dalli, “Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review,” Manag. Serv. Qual., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. W. Darmalaksana, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan,” Pre-Print Digit. Libr. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. A. O'Donnell, “Contemplative pedagogy and mindfulness: Developing creative attention in an age of distraction,” J. Philos. Educ., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. M. P. A. Murphy, “COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy,” Contemp. Secur. Policy, pp. 1–14, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. S. Hubalovsky, M. Hubalovska, and M. Musilek, “Assessment of the influence of adaptive E-learning on learning effectiveness of primary school pupils,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 92, pp. 691–705, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. A. A. Bilyalova, D. A. Salimova, and T. I. Zelenina, “Digital transformation in education,” in International Conference on Integrated Science, 2019, pp. 265–276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. P. Soto-Acosta, “COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting digital transformation to a high-speed gear,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 260–266, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. D. Mhlanga and T. Moloi, “COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation of Education: What Are We Learning on 4IR in South Africa?,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 7, p. 180, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. R. Muskania and M. S. Zulela, “Realita Transformasi Digital Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar Selama Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Pendidik. Dasar Nusant., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. B. Bogdandy, J. Tamas, and Z. Toth, “Digital Transformation in Education during COVID-19: A Case Study,” in 2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2020, pp. 173–178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. W. B. (IBRD), “Teacher certification and beyond: An empirical evaluation of the teacher certification program and education quality improvements in Indonesia,” 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. P. McKenzie , “Study on teacher absenteeism in Indonesia 2014,” 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. A. B. Ragatz, “Indonesia-A video study of teaching practices in TIMSS eighth grade mathematics classrooms: understanding what teaching practices are used, why they are used and how they relate to student learning,” The World Bank, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. H. Fitria, M. Kristiawan, and N. Rahmat, “Upaya Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Melalui Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas,” Abdimas Unwahas, vol. 4, no. 1, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. W. Bunawan, M. A. Rangkuti, and J. Yanti, “High-Level Comprehension Skill by using Competencies PISA in Indonesia's Education System,” 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. UNICEF, “Supporting your child's mental health as they return to school during COVID-19.” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. I. Asanov, F. Flores, D. McKenzie, M. Mensmann, and M. Schulte, “Remote-learning, time-use, and mental health of Ecuadorian high-school students during the COVID-19 quarantine,” World Dev., vol. 138, p. 105225, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. T. McAleavy, C. Joynes, E. Gibbs, and K. Sims, “What steps are being taken to reach the most disadvantaged students during the period of COVID-19 school closure,” Educ. Dev. Trust. https//edtechhub. org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/disadvantaged-students. pdf, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. H. Abdulrahim and F. Mabrouk, “COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation of Saudi Higher Education.,” Asian J. Distance Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 291–306, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. S. Giannini and A. Albrectsen, “COVID-19 school closures around the world will hit girls hardest.” UNESCO, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. S. Gupta and M. K. Jawanda, “The impacts of COVID‐19 on children,” Acta Paediatr., vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 2181–2183, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. V. M. Hoang, H. H. Hoang, Q. L. Khuong, N. Q. La, and T. T. H. Tran, “Describing the pattern of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam,” Glob. Health Action, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1776526, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. L. la Velle, S. Newman, C. Montgomery, and D. Hyatt, “Initial teacher education in England and the Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 596–608, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. S. Carvalho, J. Rossiter, N. Angrist, S. Hares, and R. Silverman, “Planning for School Reopening and Recovery After COVID-19,” Cent. Glob. Dev., 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. S. M. Ravitch, “FLUX PEDAGOGY: TRANSFORMING TEACHING AND LEADING DURING CORONAVIRUS.,” Perspect. Urban Educ., vol. 17, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Z. Kang , “Adaptive learning pedagogy of universal design for learning (UDL) for multimodal training,” J. Aviat. Educ. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 23–48, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. T. Mutton, “Teacher education and Covid-19: responses and opportunities for new pedagogical initiatives.” Taylor & Francis, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. D. Cantoni, Y. Chen, D. Y. Yang, N. Yuchtman, and Y. J. Zhang, “Curriculum and ideology,” J. Polit. Econ., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 338–392, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. C. Greenhow, C. Lewin, and K. B. Staudt Willet, “The educational response to Covid-19 across two countries: a critical examination of initial digital pedagogy adoption,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., pp. 1–19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. M. Huda , “Empowering children with adaptive technology skills: Careful engagement in the digital ınformation age,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 693–708, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. M. Assunção Flores and M. Gago, “Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507–516, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. H. Peng, S. Ma, and J. M. Spector, “Personalized adaptive learning: an emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. K. Colchester, H. Hagras, D. Alghazzawi, and G. Aldabbagh, “A survey of artificial intelligence techniques employed for adaptive educational systems within e-learning platforms,” J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Pandemic Pedagogy in The Era of Digital Transformation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2021
      663 pages
      ISBN:9781450386920
      DOI:10.1145/3516875

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format