skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516926acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Construction and Validation of Physics Test Measuring Students' Concept Understanding on Fluid

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Student's understanding of Physics plays a vital role for Vocational students especially in the aviation program. This urgency, a strong basic science, also written in SKKNI of aviation. One of Physics topic that has a close relation with aviation is fluid, for both static and dynamic fluid. This research aims for developing an instrument as well as knowing student's concept understanding about fluid. The instruments were developed through content validity and tested to 105 students grade XI of SMK Penerbangan Bina Dhirgantara. The data were analyzed using quest program and student's concept understanding were described by looking at student's responses at each number. The result shows that from 25 questions tested, 21 questions are qualified and 4 questions were rejected. The most difficult questions for students are determining factors affecting the magnitude of hydrostatic pressure, explaining how the pascal's law works in the hydraulic system of an airplane and applying the concept of Bernoulli's law in the combustion chamber.

References

  1. Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Learning Objectives. J Med Lib Assoc, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andayani, Y., Hadisaputra, S., & Hasnawati, H. (2018). Analysis of the Level of Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1095(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1095/1/012045Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, B., Adzhar, J., & Awanis, K. (2020). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. In Technology, Knowledge and Learning (Issue 0123456789). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dwianto, A., Wilujeng, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). The development of science domain based learning tool which is integrated with local wisdom to improve science process skill and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7205Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fahim, M., & Eslamdoost, S. (2014). Critical thinking: Frameworks and models for teaching. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hunaepi, H., Nuraini, I., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Profiling students ’ environmental care attitudes taught using Sasak Tribe local wisdom-integrated model. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.10009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for Conceptual Understanding in Science. In Teaching for Conceptual Understanding in Science. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781938946103Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kemdikbud. (2018). Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Mata Pelajaran SMK (Perdirjen Dikdasmen No. 464/D.D5/KR/2018). https://smk.kemdikbud.go.id/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Komarudin, U., Rustaman, N. Y., & Hasanah, L. (2017). Promoting students’ conceptual understanding using STEM-based e-book. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848(May). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983976Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Malone, K. L., Schunn, C. D., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2018). Improving Conceptual Understanding and Representation Skills Through Excel-Based Modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9706-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Muharam, D. A. M., Munandar, A., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Utilization of the school environment as a learning resource to improve critical thinking skills and scientific attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2020). Determining Students’ Conceptual Understandings of Physics Concepts. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i3.2908Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Perdana, R., Rudibyani, R. B., Budiyono, Sajidan, & Sukarmin. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry social complexity to improving critical and creative thinking skills of senior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13430aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Phanphech, P., Tanitteerapan, T., & Murphy, E. (2019). Explaining and enacting for conceptual understanding in secondary school physics. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 180–204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Prayitno, B. A., Suciati, & Titikusumawati, E. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills in Science Through INSTAD Strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1046–1055.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Qing, Z., Jing, G., Yazhuan, L., Ting, W., & Junping, M. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers ’ critical thinking Disposition by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.345Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahmawati, Hamidah I, Ristaman N&Rusdiana D (2018). The Development and Validation of Conceptual Knowledge Test to Evaluate Conceptual Knowledge of Physics Prospective Teachers on Electricity and Magnetism Topic. JPII, https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13490Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Creative thinking skills of prospective physics teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Robert L. Thorndike dan Elizabeth, “Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education,”dalam Sudijono, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, 372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Roth, J. K. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction in Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sands, D. (2014). Concepts and conceptual understanding: what are we talking about? New Directions, 10(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2014.00030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Santi, D. H., Prayitno, B. A., & Muzzazinah, M. (2019). Problem solving process and creative thinking of students in ecosystem issue. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.9647Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sriarunrasmee, J., Suwannatthachote, P., & Dachakupt, P. (2016). Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students ’ Science Learning Outcomes Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students ’ Sci. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(July 2015), 1721–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.226Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Suharsimi Arikunto. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Jakarta: PT Bumi AksaraGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2021
    663 pages
    ISBN:9781450386920
    DOI:10.1145/3516875

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format