skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516927acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of Students’ Logical Thinking Skill in Solving Mathematical Literacy based on Ethnomathematics in Primary School

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Logical thinking skill is one of the life skills in the 21st century must have to learn to face global competition. Logical thinking skills could be measured using a problem of mathematical literacy based on ethnomathematics. This research aimed to analyze the profile logical thinking skills of primary school students in solving mathematical literacy based on ethnomathematics. The research approach used is descriptive quantitative research with the survey method. This study was conducted with 79 fifth-grade primary school students in Surakarta and Boyolali. The instruments used to collect data were mathematical literacy based on ethnomathematics which consisting of five aspects that are understanding, planning, determining, solving, and conclusion. The results of this study indicated the percentage achievement of mathematical literacy in the category spatial literacy (53,45%), numerical literacy (44,68%), and quantitative literacy (36,33%). Low percentage achievement of mathematical literacy due to students have a low mathematical logical thinking that is a medium category on aspect understanding (55,82%) and planning (51,08%), low category on aspect determining (47,85%) and solving (41,52%), very low category on aspects conclusion (31,14%). This study implies that teachers need to develop learning that supports students' logical thinking through integrated ethnomathematics on process learning.

References

  1. Z. S. Ruziyeva, S. N. Kurbonova, and G. E. Saidova, “Technology for the development of logical thinking in students in primary school,” J. Crit. Rev., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 485–491, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. W. E. Mahendra, “Project Based Learning Bermuatan Etnomatematika Dalam Pembelajar Matematika,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. García-Santillán, A. E. Wurzinger, and E. Tejada-Peña, “What factors explain the anxiety level towards the study of mathematics among elementary school students?,” Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 564, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Yunus, “Transformasi Nilai-Nilai Budaya Lokal Sebagai Upaya Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa (Penelitian Studi Kasus Budaya Huyula Di Kota Gorontalo),” J. Penelit. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–77, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Bakhyt, B. Kalimbetov, and Z. Khabibullayev, “Possibilities of mathematical problems in logical thinking. Development of secondary education pupils,” Opcion, vol. 34, no. 85–2, pp. 441–457, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. N. Sari, “Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pasir Pengaraian,” J. BSIS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. P. Dwyer, M. J. Hogan, and I. Stewart, “An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 12, pp. 43–52, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. N. Siregar and Y. Roza, “The Logical Thinking Ability of Mathematics Education Students of Riau University on Algorithms and Programming Courses,” in Proceedings of the UR International Conference on Educational Sciences, 2019, pp. 367–372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. R. Lai, “Critical thinking: A literature review,” Pearson's Res. Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 40–41, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Suharta and I. Suarjana, “A Case Study on Mathematical Literacy of Prospective Elementary School Teachers.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 413–424, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Mulyono and D. I. Lestari, “The Analysis Of Mathematical Literacy And Self-Efficacy Of Students In Search, Solve, Create, And Share (SSCS) Learning With A Contextual Approach,” Proceeding of ICMSE, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. M–159, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Afni, “Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) as a strategy to improve students mathematical literacy,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1581, no. 1, p. 12043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. I. Maryati, N. A. Hamdani, and T. S. Sumartini, “How to improve the mathematical literacy ability of elementary school teachers education student,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1987, no. 1, p. 12039.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Mariani and P. Hendikawati, “Mathematizing process of junior high school students to improve mathematics literacy refers PISA on RCP learning,” in Journal of physics: Conference series, 2017, vol. 824, no. 1, p. 12049.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. W. Widada, D. Herawaty, A. Falaq, D. Anggoro, A. Yudha, and M. K. Hayati, “Ethnomathematics and outdoor learning to improve problem solving ability,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 295, p. 295, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Maryati and C. Prahmana, “Ethnomathematics: Exploration of the muntuk community,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 47–49, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Fajriyah, “Peran etnomatematika terkait konsep matematika dalam mendukung literasi,” Prism. Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 114–119, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Sugianto, W. Abdullah, and S. T. Widodo, “Reyog Ponorogo art exploration as mathematics learning resources: An ethnomathematics study,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1188, no. 1, p. 12095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. Aksu and N. Koruklu, “Determination the Effects of Vocational High School Students’ Logical and Critical Thinking Skills on Mathematics Success | Matematik Başarısı ile Tutum, Mantıksal Düşünme Yetenekleri ve Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri Arasındaki Doğrudan ve Dolaylı İlişkile,” Egit. Arastirmalari - Eurasian J. Educ. Res., no. 59, pp. 181–206, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Kurniawati and B. S. Fatimah, “Problem Solving Learning Approach Using Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) Model and The Student's Mathematical Logical Thingking Skills,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Res. Implement. Educ. Math. Sci., no. May, pp. 18–20, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. L. Incikabi, A. Tuna, and A. C. Biber, “An Analysis Of Mathematics Teacher,” J. Int. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 257–267, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. G. Ristiana, E. Istianah, and D. F. Pratama, “Adversity quotient and logical thinking skills of prospective primary school teachers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1657, no. 1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Y. F. Lay, “Logical Thinking Abilities among Form 4 Students in the Interior Division of Sabah, Malaysia,” J. Sci. Math. Educ. Southeast Asia, vol. 32, no. December 2009, pp. 161–27; 187, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Syawahid and S. Putrawangsa, “Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar,” Beta J. Tadris Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 222–240, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E. Suharyono and R. Rosnawati, “Analisis Buku Teks Pelajaran Matematika SMP ditinjau dari Literasi Matematika,” Mosharafa J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 451–462, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. R. H. N. Sari, “Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana,” in Seminar Nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika UNY, 2015, vol. 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Masjaya and Wardono, “Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningatkan SDM,” Prism. Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 568–574, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. N. T. Anwar, “Peran Kemampuan Literasi Matematis pada Pembelajaran Matematika Abad-21,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 364–370, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. H. Hartono and M. Saputro, “Ethnomathematics on Dayak tabun traditional tools for school mathematics learning,” Int. J. Trends Math. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. V. Albanese, N. Adamuz-Povedano, and R. Bracho-López, “The evolution of ethnomathematics: Two theoretical views and two approaches to education,” in Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education, Springer, 2017, pp. 307–328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Z. S. Pamungkas, N. S. Aminah, F. Nurosyid, and S. Wahyuni, “Students Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Scientific Literacy using a Metacognitive Test Based on Scientific Literacy,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. J. De Lange, “Mathematics for literacy,” Quant. Lit. Why Numer. matters Sch. Coll., vol. 80, pp. 75–89, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. I. Rafianti, Y. Setiani, and N. Novaliyosi, “Profil kemampuan literasi kuantitatif calon guru matematika,” JPPM (Jurnal Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 11, no. 1, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. F. M. Firdaus, “Improving Primary Students’ Mathematical Literacy through Problem Based Learning and Direct Instruction.,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 212–219, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. D. Shafina, D. Lengkana, T. Jalmo, and D. Maulina, “The Effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving on Logical Thinking Ability and Mastery of Concepts,” J. Pena Sains Vol. 7, No. 1, Mon. Year, vol. 7, no. 01, pp. 40–45, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2021
    663 pages
    ISBN:9781450386920
    DOI:10.1145/3516875

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format