skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Multicultural Problem-Based Learning Model in 2013 Curriculum

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to (1) find out, describe and formulate the design of a multicultural problem-based learning model, (2) find out and describe the validity of the multicultural problem-based model. This research is a development research with ADDIE development method The instrument of the feasibility of the learning model is viewed from the aspects of (1) Syntax, (2) Social System, (3) Reaction Principle, (4) Support System, (5) Learning Impact. Determination of content validity using the Lawshe method, involving 5 experts. Data analysis method to obtain the results of model development with descriptive analysis techniques using the CVR Content Validity Ratio) method. The results of the research (1) Problem-Based Learning Model with Multicultural Content is designed with the stages of preliminary, core and closing activities by integrating multicultural content with divine values, human rights justice, unity, democracy and social justice. (2) The results of the validity of the developed model were declared valid by 5 experts. The multicultural problem-based learning model that has been designed is feasible to be implemented to determine its effectiveness.

References

  1. Aminkeng. A Alemanji and Dervin, F. ‘If An Apple is a Foreign Apple You Have To Wash It Very Carefully’: Youth discourses on racism. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11, 3, (Sep, 2016), 199-212. DOI: http://dx.doi.org.10.1177/1746197916648284Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Joon K. Kim, Vincent Basile, Jesus Jaime-Diaz & Ray Black. Internal Orientalism And Multicultural Acts: The Challenges Of Multicultural Education In Korea, Multicultural Education Review 11, 1, (Jan, 2018), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2018.1423540Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Soudien, C., & McKinney, C. 2016. The character of the multicultural education discussion in South Africa. Book series of learning from difference: comparative accounts of multicultural education. Springer, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal, A. 2016. From deficit to expansive learning: Policies, outcomes, and possibilities for multicultural education and systemic transformation in the United States. Book series of learning from difference: comparative accounts of multicultural education, Springer, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianco.L.J. 2016. Multicultural education in the Australian context: An historical overview. Book series of learning from difference: comparative accounts of multicultural education, Springer, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Raihani, R. Education for multicultural citizens in Indonesia: policies and practices, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 1,1, (Nov 2017), 1-18, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1746197916648284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arsal, Z. "Critical multicultural education and preservice teachers’ multicultural attitudes",Journal for Multicultural Education, 13, 1, (Mar, 2019), 108-118, DOI: http://dx.doi.org.10.1108/JME-10-20170059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Nganga, L. Analyzing Children's Literature for Hidden Bias HelpsPreservice Teachers Gain Pedagogical Practices in Critical Multicultural Education, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34, 1, (Jan, 2020), 93-107, Januari, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org.10.1080/02568543.2019.1692109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 tahun 2014 Tentang Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan dan dan Kebudayaan RIGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceker, E & Ozdamli, F. Features and characteristics of problem based learning. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science 11- 4, (Des, 2016), 195-202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org.10.18844/cjes.v11i4.1296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Arnyana, IBP. 2019. Pembelajaran Untuk meningkatkan Kopetensi 4C Untuk menyongsong Era Abad 21. In Proceedings Konfrensi Nasional Matematika dan IPA Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi. i-xiii,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Arends, RI and Kilcher, A, 2010.Teaching for Student Learning. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Arends, R.I. 2004. Learning to teach (6th Ed). MC Graw-Hillbook Company, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Banks, J. A. 1997. Education Citizen in A Multicultural Society. Allyn & Bacon, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ashmawi, Y.P., Sanchez, E.H & Carmona, J.F. Testimonialista Pedagogues: Testimonio Pedagogy in Critical Multicultural Education. International Journal of Multicultural Education 20, 1 (Jun, 2018), 67-85. Doi: 10.18251/ijme.v20i1.1524Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nieto, S and Bode, P. 2011. Affirming diversity: the sociopolitical context of multicultural education. (6th ed.), Pearson Education Inc, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Parekh, B. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozolins, J. T. Creating Public Values: Schools as moral Habitats. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 4, 4, (Sep,2010), 411-423. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14695812.2008.00491.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sekretariat Jendral MPR RI. 2012 Empat Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral MPR RI, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendryadi. 2014. Content Validity, Teorionline Personal Paper, No. 01/June-2014, www.teorionline.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Colin Ayre1 and Andrew John Scally, Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisitingthe Original Methods of Calculation, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 47, 1, (Dec, 2014), 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0748175613513808Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Banks, J.A. 2002. An Introduction to Multicultural Education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston-London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Barrows, H. 1986. A Taxonomy of Problem-Based Learning Methods, Medical EducationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaclyn CH, Margarita JS & Ofelia S. Transforming Education With Problem-Based Learning: Documenting Missed Opportunities for Multicultural Perspectives, Multicultural Perspectives 22, 3, (Nov, 2020), 118-129. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2020.1792303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zammit J. Maltese Educators’ Perceptions of Democracy, Equality and Justice in Multicultural Education, IAFOR Journal of Education: Inclusive Education 9, 1, (Jan,2021), 153-171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.1.09Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Arphattananon, T. Breaking the Mold of Liberal Multicultural Education in Thailand through Social Studies lessons, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 94, 1, (Dec, 2020), 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1860873Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Brazill, S. C. Pedagogical Strategies for Teaching a Multicultural Education Course: From Safe Space to Brave Space for a Community of Learners.Educational Research: Theory and Practice 31, 2, (Mar, 2020), 56-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Aslan,S. How is Multicultural Education Perceived in Elementary Schools in Turkey? A Case Study. European Journal of Educational Research 8, 1, (Dec, 2018), 233-247. DOI 10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.233Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zilliacus, H., Holm, G., & Sahlstrom, F. Taking steps towards institutionalising multicultural education – The national curriculum of Finland. Multicultural Education Review, 9, 4, (Okt, 2017), 231-248. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2017.1383810Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2021
    663 pages
    ISBN:9781450386920
    DOI:10.1145/3516875

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format