skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516967acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilization of Digital Badges to Improve Learners’ Retention in Online Course

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Learners’ retention is an essential factor that affects the completion rate of online learning in universities. Learners with high retention have a preponderant probability of completing the course with satisfactory results. The development of online courses using digital badges is a strategy to increase learners’ retention. Student retention is a matter that is often found in online courses or lectures at the college level. One of the actions taken to increase student retention is the use of digital badges. This study aims to increase learner retention through digital badges in the Learning Management System (LMS), which in this research is using Moodle. The research respondents were college students involved in the online course “Remote Sensing for Water Resources Management.” The research method used is an experiment comparing courses that use digital badges and courses that do not use them. The research data was obtained from log data on the Moodle and analyzed by K-Means Clustering technique to obtain three categories of learner retention: high retention, medium retention, and low retention. The results showed that the use of digital badges can increase learners’ retention. Based on these results, this study recommends using digital badges to develop online courses or online lectures.

References

  1. S. Wild and L. Schulze Heuling, “Student dropout and retention: An event history analysis among students in cooperative higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 104, no. June, p. 101687, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. Wittner, S. Powazny, and S. Kauffeld, “Supporting Rita: A Social Cognitive Approach to (First-Generation) Students’ Retention,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., 2019, doi: 10.1177/1521025119882358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Knekta and M. McCartney, “What Can Departments Do to Increase Students’ Retention? A Case Study of Students’ Sense of Belonging and Involvement in a Biology Department,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 721–742, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1521025118788351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. X. Liu, Linking Competence to Opportunities to Learn: Models of Competence and Data Mining. New York: Springer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Espinoza and G. M. Genna, “Hi, I Want to Talk to You About Your Progress: A Large Course Intervention for At-Risk College Students,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–27, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1521025118790054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. K. Mah, “Learning Analytics and Digital Badges: Potential Impact on Student Retention in Higher Education,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 285–305, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10758-016-9286-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. A. Lemoine and M. D. Richardson, “Micro-Credentials, Nano Degrees, and Digital Badges,” Int. J. Technol. Educ. Mark., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36–49, 2015, doi: 10.4018/ijtem.2015010104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. H. Duin and J. Tham, “The Current State of Analytics: Implications for Learning Management System (LMS) Use in Writing Pedagogy,” Comput. Compos., vol. 55, p. 102544, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Littlejohn and C. Milligan, “Designing MOOCs for Professional Learners: Tools and Patterns to Encourage Self-Regulated Learning,” Des. MOOCs Prof. Learn. Tools patterns to Encourage. self-regulated Learn., no. 42, p. 4, 2015, doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1428569.v2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Shibani, S. Knight, and S. Buckingham Shum, “Educator perspectives on learning analytics in classroom practice,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 46, no. March 2019, p. 100730, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Milligan, “Crowd-sourced learning in MOOCs: Learning analytics meets measurement theory,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., vol. 16-20-Marc, pp. 151–155, 2015, doi: 10.1145/2723576.2723596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. L. Kanuru and M. Priyaadharshini, “Lifelong Learning in higher education using Learning Analytics,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 172, no. 2019, pp. 848–852, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Whitelock-Wainwright, Y.-S. Tsai, H. Drachsler, M. Scheffel, and D. Gašević, “An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 51, no. April 2019, p. 100818, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Mazza, M. Bettoni, M. Faré, and L. Mazzola, “MOCLog – Monitoring Online Courses with log data,” 1st Moodle Res. Conf., pp. 132–139, 2012, Online. Available: http://research.moodle.net/mod/data/view.php?d=3&rid=17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. D. Zerquera, M. Ziskin, and V. Torres, “Faculty Views of ‘Nontraditional’ Students: Aligning Perspectives for Student Success,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2018, doi: 10.1177/1521025116645109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. K. Milligan and P. Griffin, “Understanding Learning and Learning Design in MOOCs: A Measurement-Based Interpretation,” J. Learn. Anal., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–115, 2016, doi: 10.18608/jla.2016.32.5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. van der Meer, R. Wass, S. Scott, and J. Kokaua, “Entry Characteristics and Participation in a Peer Learning Program as Predictors of First-Year Students’ Achievement, Retention, and Degree Completion,” AERA Open, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 233285841773157, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2332858417731572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Gibson, N. Ostashewski, K. Flintoff, S. Grant, and E. Knight, Digital badges in education, vol. 20, no. 2. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Abramovich, C. Schunn, and R. M. Higashi, “Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 217–232, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Everhart, D. Seymour, and K. Yoshino, “The Currency of Higher Education: Credits and Competencies,” 2015. http://bbbb.blackboard.com/CurrencyofHigherEducation (accessed Aug. 17, 2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. J. Newby and Z. Cheng, “Instructional digital badges: effective learning tools,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1053–1067, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09719-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Abramovich, “Understanding digital badges in higher education through assessment,” Horiz., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 126–131, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1108/OTH-08-2015-0044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. V. Devedžić and J. Jovanović, “Developing Open Badges: a comprehensive approach,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 603–620, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11423-015-9388-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. U.-K. Ozlem, “The effects of career interventions on university students’ levels of career decision-making self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review,” Aust. J. Career Dev., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 223–233, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1038416219857567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. B. Springer, “Forty Years: Where Is Competency-Based Education?,” Adult Learn., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 54–56, May 2020, doi: 10.1177/1045159519892696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Utilization of Digital Badges to Improve Learners’ Retention in Online Course

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
      September 2021
      663 pages
      ISBN:9781450386920
      DOI:10.1145/3516875

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format