skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3516984acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

University Cultural Inclusiveness: A Case at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Program

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to describe the cultural inclusiveness of the Faculty of Teacher Training and education, Universitas Sebelas maret Surakarta. The subjects were 32 lecturers, 22 administration staffs, and 63 students on the bases of voluntary participation. The instrument was the Cultural Standard of the Higher Education metric (the Metric consisted of three standards: cultural, practice, and supports). It consisted of 33 Likert Scale Items with 6 dimensions. The s half reliabilities of the scales were 0.538 for the scales for lecturers, 0.578 for scales for students, and 0.644 for the ones inclusiveness. The scores were 3.66 for lecturers, 3.44 for administration staffs, and 3.55 for students. When data were broken down by dimensions, the highest scorers were for higher expectation for administration staffs. The results indicated that lecturers, administration staffs and students had high cultural for students with disabilities (3.77), rights of individuals with disabilities for higher education (3.74), and support for friendly environment of individual with disabilities (3.67). The lowest dimension was in the choice of being inclusive (3.04). The result of the study showed that lecturers, administration staffs, and students of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education has high cultural inclusiveness.

References

  1. Sujak, A. (2020). Mengajar Generasi Z. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Insan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dyches, T.T. and Prater, M.A. (2010). Disproportionate representation in special education, in Obbiakor, F.E., Bakken, J.P. & and Rotatori, A. F. (eds). Current issues in special education: sidentification, assessment, and teaching. Wagon Lane, UK: Emerald.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 13 Tahun 2020 tentang Akomodasi yang Layak Untuk Peserta Didik Penyanfdang Disabilitas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Permenristekdikti Nomor 46 Tahun 2017 tentang Pendidikan Khusus dan Pendidikan Layanan Khusus di Perguruan Tinggi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, J. (2003). From exclusion to inclusion: some lessons from abroad, in Stuart PowellGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. UIN Suko (2020). Admisi dan beasiswa bagi difabel di UIN Sunan Kalijaga. [email protected].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Widodo, W.A. (2020). Pusat Studi Layanan Disabilitas Universitas Brawijaya Raih Penghargaan Internasional Kompas. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2020/03/13/175019271/pusat-studi-layanan- disabilitas-universitas-brawijaya-raih-penghargaan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sunardi, Sugini, Martika, T., Prakusha, D. (2020) The development of Inclusion Metric for Indonesian higher education in Institutions, in Books of Abstracts- The 4th ICLIQE. Sebelas Maret University, 5 September 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for Inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. London: Center for Studies on Inclusive Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sumzski, G., Smogorzewska, J.& Grygiels, P. (2020). Attitudes of students toward people with disabilities, moral identity and inclusive education—A two-level analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 102 (2020) 103685. www.elsevier.com/locate/redevdisGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Saloviita, T. (2018). Attitudes of Teachers Towards Inclusive Education in Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yada, A. & Savolainen, H. (2017). Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education. 64 (2017) 222e229. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tateGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Alnahdi, G. H., Elhadi, A. & Schwab, S. (2020). Positive impacts of knowledge and quality of contact on university students’ attitudes towards individual with intellectual disability in the Arab World. Resarch and Developmental Studies. September. Journal homepage www.elsevier.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2016). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
    September 2021
    663 pages
    ISBN:9781450386920
    DOI:10.1145/3516875

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format