Ratna Hidayah
ABSTRACT
Contribution of intrinsic factors in curriculum implementation has received less attention to the success of the reform curriculum. This study aims to see how the interest of elementary school teachers towards the implementation of the reform curriculum. This study involved 167 elementary school teachers in the city of Yogyakarta. This research is qualitative interpretive and analyzed using interpretive analysis. The data collected was obtained from questionnaires, interviews, and observations. The results showed that after undergoing a curriculum change, the interest of elementary school teachers was still moderate. The aspect of awareness has the lowest value compared to the aspects of interest, attention and concentration. This means that his awareness to learn educational policies and implement new curricula needs to be increased. In the implementation of curriculum changes, seen from the planning stage all teachers have implemented them. In the implementation stage, not all teachers apply a student-centered learning approach. At the assessment stage, there are still few teachers who assess three competencies in the learning process, attitudes, knowledge, and skills. Thus, it is necessary to have more considerations and need to think about steps to overcome them.
- M. Arani, “Japan's National Curriculum Reforms: Focus on Integrated Curriculum Approach.,” Online Submiss., 2008.Google Scholar
- Z. Deng, S. Gopinathan, and C. K.-E. Lee, “The Singapore Curriculum: Convergence, Divergence, Issues and Challenges,” 2013, pp. 263–275.Google Scholar
- Y. Koc, M. Isiksal, and S. Bulut, “Elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey,” Int. Educ. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. Selvaraj, “English Language Teaching ( ELT ) Curriculum Reforms in Malaysia,” Voice Acad., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2010.Google Scholar
- F. Zhang and Y. Liu, “A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 187–204, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1362168813505940.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Flouris and G. Pasias, “A Critical Appraisal of Curriculum Reform in Greece (1980-2002),” Eur. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 73–90, 2003, doi: 10.2753/eue1056-4934350373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Huang, “Curriculum reform in contemporary China: Seven goals and six strategies,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2004, doi: 10.1080/002202703200004742000174126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Q. Guan and W. Meng, “China's New National Curriculum Reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies,” Front. Educ. China, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 579–604, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11516-007-0043-6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. P. Ornstein, Alan C and Hunkins, Curriculum: Foundation, Principles, And Issues, Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc, 2004.Google Scholar
- T. Sargent, M. Chen, Y. J. Wu, and C. Chen, “Wearing new shoes to walk the old road: The negotiation of opposing imperatives in high school new curriculum classes in China,” Int. Perspect. Educ. Soc., vol. 15, pp. 79–98, 2011, doi: 10.1108/S1479-3679(2011)0000015007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Budiani, Sri; Sudarmin and Syamwil, “Evaluation of the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in the Independent Implementing School,” Innov. J. Curric. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2016.Google Scholar
- I. N. and S. Ruja, “Problem Survey of National Curriculum Implementation 2013 Session for Social Knowledge Science First Middle School in East Java,” Hist. Cult., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–199, 2015.Google Scholar
- Y. Telaumbanua, “Analysis of Issues Of 2013 Curriculum Implementation,” J. Polingua Sci. J. Linguist. Lit. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–105, 2014.Google Scholar
- M. Kamiludin and Suryaman, “Problems in the 2013 Curriculum Learning Assessment Implementation,” J. Prima Edukasia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Wahyuni, Rina and Berliani, “Problematics Implementation of Curriculum 2013 In Elementary Schools,” JMSP (Jurnal Manaj. dan Supervisi Pendidikan), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 63–69, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. M. R. Jannah, “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik dalam Rangka Impelemntasi Kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri Tegalrejo 1 Yogyakarta,” Yogyakarta: PGSD FKIP UNY, 2017.Google Scholar
- A. D. S. Krisandi, Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: FKIP Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2013.Google Scholar
- T. S. Susiani, M. Salimi, Ngatman, R. Hidayah, and Suhartono, “STEAM in art education course: Students perception,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 6–9, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3452144.3452266.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Creswell, “Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed, edisi ketiga. (Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.,” Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 2, no. November 2012, pp. 1–11, 2011.Google Scholar
- C. Alice,Crow & Lester D, Educational Psychology. New Jersey: Litlefeld Adams and co, 1992.Google Scholar
- C. and I. H. Carmichael, The Development and Validation of the Students’ Self-efficacy for Statistical Literacy Scale. in 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Palmerston North: NZ: MERGA, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. Drigas and M. Karyotaki, “Attention and its role: Theories and models,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 169–182, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i12.10185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. B. Hurlock, Child Development Sixth Edition Volume I. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2014.Google Scholar
- J. D. Nichols and G. Zhang, “Classroom environments and student empowerment: An analysis of elementary and secondary teacher beliefs,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–239, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10984-011-9091-1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Fullan, “Leading in a Culture of Change By Michael Fullan,” Change, pp. 1–15, 2002.Google Scholar
- Nnabuike, Aneke, and Otegbulu, “Curriculum Implementation and the Teacher: Issues, Challenges and the Way Forward,” Int. J. Commer. IT Soc. Sci., vol. 03, no. 06, pp. 41–48, 2016.Google Scholar
- W. Sanjaya, Curriculum and Learning Theory and Practice of KTSP Development. Jakarta: Karya Putra Darwati, 2008.Google Scholar
- L. M. Dos Santos, “The relationship between teachers’ beliefs, teachers’ behaviors, and teachers’ professional development: A literature review,” International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 7, no. 1. pp. 10–18, 2019, doi: 10.18488/journal.61.2019.71.10.18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. H. Leng, N. Abedalaziz, A. V. Orleans, Z. Naimie, and A. Islam, “Teaching Practices of Malaysian Science Teachers: Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Implicit Intelligence.,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 48–59, 2018.Google Scholar
- D. W. Putwain and N. P. von der Embse, “Teacher self-efficacy moderates the relations between imposed pressure from imposed curriculum changes and teacher stress,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1500681.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ryder, “Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 87–120, 2015, doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.1001629.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Taylor, “An Examination of the Relationships between Agile Leadership Factors and Curriculum Reform in Higher Education,” ProQuest LLC, no. January, 2017.Google Scholar
- S. Sagala, Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.Google Scholar
- Hosnan, Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. 2014.Google Scholar
- M. ( Fadillah, Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran SD/MI,. SD/MTS, dan SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media., 2014.Google Scholar
- J. W. Santrock, “The science of life-span development,” Theor. Dev., pp. 55–57, 2004.Google Scholar
- K. McNeill, “Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year.o Title,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 793–823, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Professional cooperation in primary school classes: general education teacher and specialization teacher views
TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThe present study focuses on the teacher cooperation levels in the new Greek primary school structure. It is based on the social network theory and it consists of a quantitative study with the use of self-reported questionnaires. Participant were ...
Modelling the sustainability of a primary school digital education curricular reform and professional development program
AbstractSustaining changes in teachers’ practices is a challenge that determines the success of curricular reforms, from which Digital Education (DE) is not exempt. As the literature on sustainability is considered “scarce” and “scattered”, long-term ...
Informatics Education in German Primary School Curricula
Informatics in Schools. A Step Beyond Digital EducationAbstractThe world is permeated by informatics, even the youngest children encounter informatics systems and the respective phenomena. Consequently, even primary school children must acquire the necessary informatics competencies to act in this world in a ...
Comments