skip to main content
10.1145/3516875.3517004acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicliqeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Correlation between Administration Staff with Disabled Students Friendly Administration Service Quality

Published:15 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the competence of the administrative staff of the study program and the quality of services provided for UNS disabled students. This research was a correlational study. The research subjects are all administrative staff of the undergraduate, masters, and doctoral study programs in the teacher training and study program of UNS with a total of 30 people. The data is collected by using tests, observations, and interviews. Based on the research, it was found that the administrative staff of the study program have not received training to increase the competencies needed in providing administrative services for students with disabilities. This has an impact on the difficulties experienced by study program administration staff in providing services to students with disabilities, especially students with hearing impairment. Administrative staff often have difficulty in communicating with them. The conclusion is that there is a positive relationship between the competence of administrative staff and the quality of friendly services for students with disabilities. It means that administrative staff with good competence in providing special services will also lead to an increase in the quality of administrative services that are friendly to students with disabilities.

References

  1. Direktorat PSLB (2008). Pendidikan Luar Biasa Dalam Angka. Jakarta: Author.Karyana, A., & Widati, S. (2013). Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Tunadaksa. Jakarta Timur: PT. Luxima Metro Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Julianne M., Joanne, Trevor. (2017). School leadership and intercultural understanding: school foyers as situated spaces for doing diversity. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Vol 21 (9) 956-973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dyches, T.T. and Prater, M.A. (2010). Disproportionate representation in special education, in Obbiakor, F.E., Bakken, J.P. & and Rotatori, A. F. (eds). Current issues in special education: identification, assessment, and teaching. Wagon Lane, UK: Emerald.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 13 Tahun 2020 tentang Akomodasi Yang Layak Untuk Peserta Didik Penyanfdang Disabilitas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Permenristekdikti Nomor 46 Tahun 2017 tentang Pendidikan Khusus dan Pendidikan Layanan Khusus di Perguruan Tinggi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charema, J. (2010). Inclusive Education in Developing Countries in the Sub Saharan Africa: From Theory to Practice. International Journal of Special Education. Vol. 25 (1). 87-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Korir, B. C. (2015). Challenges Encountered by Student with Visual Impairment and Teachers in an Integrated School Environment: a Case of Integrated Secondary School in Kericho District, Ainamoi Division, Kenya. dalam International Journal of Education, Learning and Development. Vol.3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yssel, N., Pak, N., & Beilke, J. (2016). A door must be opened: Perceptions of students with disabilities in higher education. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 63, 384-394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Susie Miles & Nidhi Singal. (2010). The Education for All and inclusive education debate: conflict, contradiction or opportunity?. International Journal of Inclusive Education Vol 14 (1) 1-15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anwar, M., & Yusuf, M. (2018). Orthopedagogik Umum. Surakarta: UNS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Arini, F.D,. Yamtinah, S. & Sunardi. (2019). Social skills of students with disablities at elementary schools in inclusive settings. International Journal of Multicultural dan Multireligious Understanding, vol 6 issue 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1999–2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: Author.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hikmawaty, H. & Rusmiyati, C. (2011). Kebutuhan Pelayanan Sosial Penyandang Cacat. Informasi. 16(1) 17 – 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenway, C.W., and Thomas, K.E. (2020). Parent experiences of home‐schooling children with special educational needs or disabilities during the coronavirus pandemic dalam jurnal British Journal of Special Education (BJSE) Vol. 47, Issue 4 December 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Yesilkaya, E. (2020). Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing a logic model to support children with visual impairments in their learning environments dalam jurnal British Journal of Special Education (BJSE) early view.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Baker, K. Q., Boland, K., Nowik, C. M. (2012). A campus survey of faculty and student perceptions of persons with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25, 309-32Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The Correlation between Administration Staff with Disabled Students Friendly Administration Service Quality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICLIQE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education
          September 2021
          663 pages
          ISBN:9781450386920
          DOI:10.1145/3516875

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format