skip to main content
10.1145/3517428.3544801acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Nothing Micro About It: Examining Ableist Microaggressions on Social Media

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ableist microaggressions are subtle forms of discrimination that disabled people experience daily, perpetuating inequalities and maintaining their ongoing marginalization. Despite the importance of understanding such harms, little work has been done to examine how disabled people are discriminated against online. We address this gap by investigating how disabled people experience ableist microaggressions on social media and how they respond to and cope with these experiences. By conducting interviews with 20 participants with various disabilities, we uncover 12 archetypes of ableist microaggressions on social media, reveal participants’ coping mechanisms, and describe the long-term impact on their wellbeing and social media use. Lastly, we present design recommendations, re-evaluating how social media platforms can mitigate and prevent these harmful experiences.

References

  1. 1990. Americans With Disabilities Act. https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Raya Al-Jadir. 2019. The damaging effect of social media positivity on disabled people. https://disabilityhorizons.com/2019/10/the-damaging-affect-of-social-media-positivity-on-disabled-people/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deniz Aydemir-Döke and James T. Herbert. 2021. Development and Validation of the Ableist Microaggression Impact Questionnaire. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin(2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552211014259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ayoka Bell. 2013. Nothing about us without us: A qualitative investigation of the experiences of being a target of ableist microaggressions. (2013). https://www.proquest.com/docview/1536397558Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cynthia L. Bennett. 2017. Disability-Disclosure Preferences and Practices in Online Dating Communities. XRDS 24, 2 (dec 2017), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3155120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 24 (dec 2017), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure during Shifting Social Movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Luke Breitfeller, Emily Ahn, David Jurgens, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2019. Finding Microaggressions in the Wild: A Case for Locating Elusive Phenomena in Social Media Posts. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, 1664–1674. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1176Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Carol J. Gill Carmit-Noa Shpigelman. 2014. ”Facebook Use by Persons with Disabilities”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (2014), 610–624. Issue 3. https://doi-org.proxy.library.cornell.edu/10.1111/jcc4.12059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jessica Caron and Janice Light. 2016. “Social Media has Opened a World of ‘Open communication:’” experiences of Adults with Cerebral Palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Social Media. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 32, 1 (2016), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052887 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052887PMID: 26056722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sue Caton and Melanie Chapman. 2016. The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 41, 2(2016), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1153052 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1153052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Meta Transparency Center. 2022. ”Hate Speech”. (2022). https://transparency.fb.com/policies/community-standards/hate-speech/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohit Chandra, Manvith Reddy, Shradha Sehgal, Saurabh Gupta, Arun Balaji Buduru, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2021. ”A Virus Has No Religion”: Analyzing Islamophobia on Twitter During the COVID-19 Outbreak. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (Virtual Event, USA) (HT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dasom Choi, Uichin Lee, and Hwajung Hong. 2022. “It’s Not Wrong, but I’m Quite Disappointed”: Toward an Inclusive Algorithmic Experience for Content Creators with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 593, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. John W. Creswell and Dana L. Miller. 2000. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice 39, 3 (2000), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mithun Das, Binny Mathew, Punyajoy Saha, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2020. Hate Speech in Online Social Media. SIGWEB Newsl.Autumn, Article 4 (nov 2020), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427478.3427482Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Paula Fortuna and Sérgio Nunes. 2018. A Survey on Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 4, Article 85 (jul 2018), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3232676Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jennifer Golbeck, Zahra Ashktorab, Rashad O. Banjo, Alexandra Berlinger, Siddharth Bhagwan, Cody Buntain, Paul Cheakalos, Alicia A. Geller, Quint Gergory, Rajesh Kumar Gnanasekaran, Raja Rajan Gunasekaran, Kelly M. Hoffman, Jenny Hottle, Vichita Jienjitlert, Shivika Khare, Ryan Lau, Marianna J. Martindale, Shalmali Naik, Heather L. Nixon, Piyush Ramachandran, Kristine M. Rogers, Lisa Rogers, Meghna Sardana Sarin, Gaurav Shahane, Jayanee Thanki, Priyanka Vengataraman, Zijian Wan, and Derek Michael Wu. 2017. A Large Labeled Corpus for Online Harassment Research. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (Troy, New York, USA) (WebSci ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Oliver L. Haimson. 2017. Digital and Physical Barriers to Changing Identities. XRDS 24, 2 (dec 2017), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3155118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Oliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray Areas. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 466 (oct 2021), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bing He, Caleb Ziems, Sandeep Soni, Naren Ramakrishnan, Diyi Yang, and Srijan Kumar. 2021. Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (Virtual Event, Netherlands) (ASONAM ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487351.3488324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jackson Houston, Peter Peterson, and Catherine Reich. 2020. Hate Speech Detection in Twitter: A Selectively Trained Ensemble Method. Master’s thesis. USA. Advisor(s) Richard, Maclin,. AAI27997273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Amanda Hynan, Juliet Goldbart, and Janice Murray. 2015. A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability and Rehabilitation 37, 17 (2015), 1559–1575. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1056387Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand, and David R. Karger. 2021. Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social Media. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 18 (apr 2021), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. 25, 2, Article 12 (mar 2018), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shanna Katttari. 2020. Ableist Microaggressions and the Mental Health of Disabled Adults. Community Mental Health Journal 56 (2020), 1170–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00615-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Richard Keller and Corinne Galgay. 2010. Microaggressive Experiences of People with Disabilities. Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact (2010), 241–267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ugur Kursuncu, Manas Gaur, Carlos Castillo, Amanuel Alambo, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Valerie Shalin, Dilshod Achilov, I. Budak Arpinar, and Amit Sheth. 2019. Modeling Islamist Extremist Communications on Social Media Using Contextual Dimensions: Religion, Ideology, and Hate. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 151 (nov 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359253Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Amanda Lenhart, Michele Ybarra, Kathryn Zickur, and Myeshia Price-Feeney. 2016. Online Harassment, Digital Abuse, and Cyberstalking in America. Data & Society (2016). https://www.datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Online_Harassment_2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kayla Lett, Andreea Tamaian, and Bridget Klest. 2020. Impact of ableist microaggressions on university students with self-identified disabilities. Disability & Society 35, 9 (2020), 1441–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1680344 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1680344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kaitlin Mahar, Amy X. Zhang, and David Karger. 2018. Squadbox: A Tool to Combat Email Harassment Using Friendsourced Moderation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability Studies as a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ming Cui Mathew D. Gayman, Robyn Lewis Brown. 2011. Depressive symptoms and bodily pain: the role of physical disability and social stress. Stress & Health 27(2011), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1319Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Hannah Miller, Heather Buhr, Chris Johnson, and Jerry Hoepner. 2013. AphasiaWeb: A Social Network for Individuals with Aphasia. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Bellevue, Washington) (ASSETS ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mainack Mondal, Leandro Araújo Silva, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2017. A Measurement Study of Hate Speech in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (Prague, Czech Republic) (HT ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tyler Musgrave, Alia Cummings, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2022. Experiences of Harm, Healing, and Joy among Black Women and Femmes on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 240, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Fayika Farhat Nova, MD. Rashidujjaman Rifat, Pratyasha Saha, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Shion Guha. 2019. Online Sexual Harassment over Anonymous Social Media in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (Ahmedabad, India) (ICTD ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rhoda Olkin, H’Sien Hayward, Melody Schaff Abene, and Goldie VanHeel. 2019. The Experiences of Microaggressions against Women with Visible and Invisible Disabilities.Journal of Social Issues 75 (2019), 757–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jessica A. Pater, Moon K. Kim, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Casey Fiesler. 2016. Characterizations of Online Harassment: Comparing Policies Across Social Media Platforms. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Chester M. Pierce, Jean V. Carew, Diane Pierce-Gonzalez, and Deborah Wills. 1977. An Experiment in Racism: TV Commercials. Education and Urban Society 10, 1 (1977), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001312457701000105 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/001312457701000105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rebecca Renwick. 2016. Rarely Seen, Seldom Heard: People with Intellectual Disabilities in the Mass Media. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. N.D.T. Ruwandika and A.R. Weerasinghe. 2018. Identification of Hate Speech in Social Media. In 2018 18th International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer). 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTER.2018.8615517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Matthew J. Salganik. 2017. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (open review edition ed.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Emily Saltz, Claire R Leibowicz, and Claire Wardle. 2021. Encounters with Visual Misinformation and Labels Across Platforms: An Interview and Diary Study to Inform Ecosystem Approaches to Misinformation Interventions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi-org.proxy.library.cornell.edu/10.1145/3411763.3451807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sarita Schoenebeck, Oliver L Haimson, and Lisa Nakamura. 2021. Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment. New Media & Society 23, 5 (2021), 1278–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913122 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Woosuk Seo and Hyunggu Jung. 2017. Exploring the Community of Blind or Visually Impaired People on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 371–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sharon L Snyder and David T Mitchell. 2006. Cultural Locations of Disability. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Derald Wing Sue, Christina M Capodilupo, Gina C Torino, Jennifer M Bucceri, Aisha Holder, Kevin L Nadal, and Marta Esquilin. 2007. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice.American Psychologist 62, 4 (2007), 271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Kurt Thomas, Patrick Gage Kelley, Sunny Consolvo, Patrawat Samermit, and Elie Bursztein. 2022. “It’s Common and a Part of Being a Content Creator”: Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 121, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Stefan Timmermans and Iddo Tavory. 2012. Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory 30, 3 (2012), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Nicole A. Vincent and Emma A. Jane. 2017. Beyond law: protecting victims through engineering and design. Number 30 in Routledge Studies in Crime and Society. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, United Kingdom, 209–223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Jessica Vitak, Kalyani Chadha, Linda Steiner, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Identifying Women’s Experiences With and Strategies for Mitigating Negative Effects of Online Harassment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1231–1245. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998337Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Qunfang Wu, Louisa Kayah Williams, Ellen Simpson, and Bryan Semaan. 2022. Conversations About Crime: Re-Enforcing and Fighting Against Platformed Racism on Reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW1, Article 54 (apr 2022), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Susan Xiong. 2016. The Development of the Disability Microaggressions Scale. (2016). https://hdl.handle.net/10027/20980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Nothing Micro About It: Examining Ableist Microaggressions on Social Media

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
            October 2022
            902 pages
            ISBN:9781450392587
            DOI:10.1145/3517428

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 October 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            ASSETS '22 Paper Acceptance Rate35of132submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format