Flexible Activity Tracking for Older Adults Using Mobility Aids — An Exploratory Study on Automatically Identifying Movement Modality
Article No.: 55, Pages 1 - 5
Abstract
Wearable activity trackers are inaccessible to older adults who use mobility aids (e.g., walker, wheelchair), because the accuracy of trackers drops considerably for such movement modalities (MMs). As an initial step to address this problem, we implemented and tested a minimum distance classifier to automatically identify the used MM out of seven modalities, including movement with or without a mobility aid, and no movement. Depending on the test setup, our classifier achieves accuracies between 82 % and 100 %. These findings can be leveraged in future work to combine the classifier with algorithms tailored to each mobility aid to make activity trackers accessible to users with limited mobility.
References
[1]
Hyun-Sung An, Gregory C. Jones, Seoung-Ki Kang, Gregory J. Welk, and Jung-Min Lee. 2017. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?European Journal of Sport Science 17, 3 (March 2017), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261.
[2]
Sikha Bagui, Xingang Fang, Subhash Bagui, Jeremy Wyatt, Patrick Houghton, Joe Nguyen, John Schneider, and Tyler Guthrie. 2022. An improved step counting algorithm using classification and double autocorrelation. International Journal of Computers and Applications 44, 3 (March 2022), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2020.1726006 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2020.1726006.
[3]
Jens Barth, Jochen Klucken, Patrick Kugler, Thomas Kammerer, Ralph Steidl, Jürgen Winkler, Joachim Hornegger, and Björn Eskofier. 2011. Biometric and mobile gait analysis for early diagnosis and therapy monitoring in Parkinson’s disease. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 868–871. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090226
[4]
Lynne Clay, Megan Webb, Claire Hargest, and Divya Bharatkumar Adhia. 2019. Gait quality and velocity influences activity tracker accuracy in individuals post-stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 26, 6 (Aug. 2019), 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2019.1623474 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2019.1623474.
[5]
Conor Cunningham, Roger O’ Sullivan, Paolo Caserotti, and Mark A. Tully. 2020. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 30, 5 (2020), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13616 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/sms.13616.
[6]
Andreas Ejupi, Matthew Brodie, Yves J. Gschwind, Daniel Schoene, Stephen Lord, and Kim Delbaere. 2014. Choice stepping reaction time test using exergame technology for fall risk assessment in older people. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 6957–6960. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945228
[7]
Orestis Giotakos, Katerina Tsirgogianni, and Ioannis Tarnanas. 2007. A virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) scenario for the reduction of fear of falling and balance rehabilitation training of elder adults with hip fracture history. In 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation. 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2007.4362157
[8]
Paul Kooner, Taran Schubert, James L Howard, Brent A Lanting, Matthew G Teeter, and Edward M Vasarhelyi. 2021. Evaluation of the Effect of Gait Aids, Such as Canes, Crutches, and Walkers, on the Accuracy of Step Counters in Healthy Individuals. Orthopedic Research and Reviews 13 (Jan. 2021), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S292255
[9]
Konstantinos Koutroumbas and Sergios Theodoridis. 2008. Pattern Recognition. Academic Press.
[10]
Jonas Lauritzen, Adolfo Muñoz, Jose Luis Sevillano, and Anton Civit. 2013. The usefulness of activity trackers in elderly with reduced mobility: a case study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 192 (2013), 759–762.
[11]
Denys J.C. Matthies, Marian Haescher, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Gerald Bieber. 2018. Step Detection for Rollator Users with Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial User Interaction(SUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267784
[12]
Tara O’Brien, Meredith Troutman-Jordan, Donna Hathaway, Shannon Armstrong, and Michael Moore. 2015. Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. Geriatric Nursing 36, 2 (March 2015), S21–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.019
[13]
Tiffany Sears, Elmer Alvalos, Samantha Lawson, Ian McAlister, L. Eschbach, and Jennifer Bunn. 2017. Wrist-Worn Physical Activity Trackers Tend To Underestimate Steps During Walking. International Journal of Exercise Science 10, 5 (Aug. 2017), 764–773. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijes/vol10/iss5/12
[14]
Salvatore Tedesco, Marco Sica, Andrea Ancillao, Suzanne Timmons, John Barton, and Brendan O’Flynn. 2019. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. PLOS ONE 14, 5 (May 2019), e0216891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216891 Publisher: Public Library of Science.
[15]
Dimitri Vargemidis, Kathrin Gerling, Vero Vanden Abeele, Luc Geurts, and Katta Spiel. 2021. Irrelevant Gadgets or a Source of Worry: Exploring Wearable Activity Trackers with Older Adults. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 14, 3 (Aug. 2021), 28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473463 Publisher: ACM PUB27 New York, NY, USA.
[16]
Rachel K. Walker, Amanda M. Hickey, and Patty S. Freedson. 2016. Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 20, 6 (Dec. 2016), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.CJON.606-610
[17]
Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to wear it: functional, technical, and social considerations in on-body location for wearable technology 20 years of designing for wearability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, Maui Hawaii, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123042
Index Terms
- Flexible Activity Tracking for Older Adults Using Mobility Aids — An Exploratory Study on Automatically Identifying Movement Modality
Recommendations
Wearable Physical Activity Tracking Systems for Older Adults—A Systematic Review
Special Issue on Wearable Technologies for Smart Health: Part 1Physical activity (PA) positively impacts the quality of life of older adults, with technology as a promising factor in maintaining motivation. Within Computer Science and Engineering, research investigates how to track PA of older adults for various ...
Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences
Research demonstrates that physical activity beneficially influences brain function, quality of life and reduces cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, many projects and technical developments aim to promote physical activity. As a result of the "...
Redefining Activity Tracking Through Older Adults' Reflections on Meaningful Activities
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsActivity tracking has the potential to promote active lifestyles among older adults. However, current activity tracking technologies may inadvertently perpetuate ageism by focusing on age-related health risks. Advocating for a personalized approach in ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
902 pages
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 October 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ASSETS '22
Sponsor:
ASSETS '22: The 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
October 23 - 26, 2022
Athens, Greece
Acceptance Rates
ASSETS '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 132 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 88Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)24
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View allView Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format