skip to main content
10.1145/3517428.3550388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Serenity: exploring audio-based gaming for arm-hand rehabilitation after stroke

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown that adding sonification to stroke rehabilitation training is effective. It helps patients achieve better training results by positively affecting motor control, the somatosensory system, and patient engagement. This paper explores the concept of audio-based games in stroke rehabilitation, hypothesizing that the removal of a visual dimension might increase patient focus on the body part being trained. In an expert study with nine therapists we evaluated Serenity, an audio-based rehabilitation game, as a design probe to explore the potential of audio-based games in rehabilitation training. Results show promise for further exploring the concept of audio-based gaming in stroke rehabilitation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

assets22c-sub1054-cam-i41.mp4

mp4

36.5 MB

References

  1. Frédéric Bevilacqua, Eric O. Boyer, Jules Françoise, Olivier Houix, Patrick Susini, Agnès Roby-Brami, and Sylvain Hanneton. 2016. Sensori-Motor Learning with Movement Sonification: Perspectives from Recent Interdisciplinary Studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Yu Chen, Kingsley Abel, John Janecek, Yunan Chen, Kai Zheng, and Steven Cramer. 2018. Home-based Technologies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 123 (12 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. E. Paul Cherniack. 2011. Not just fun and games: applications of virtual reality in the identification and rehabilitation of cognitive disorders of the elderly. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6, 4 (2011), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.542570 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.542570PMID: 21158520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Alfred Effenberg, Ursula Fehse, Gerd Schmitz, Björn Krüger, and Heinz Mechling. 2016. Movement Sonification: Effects on Motor Learning beyond Rhythmic Adjustments. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10 (05 2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00219Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Processing Foundation. 2021. Welcome to Processing!https://processing.org//Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Karmen Franinović and Stefania Serafin (Eds.). 2013. Sonic Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alba Gomez-Andres, Jennifer Grau-Sánchez, Esther Duarte, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells, and Ana Tajadura-Jiménez. 2019. Enriching footsteps sounds in gait rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study: Enriching footsteps sounds in stroke patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1467 (12 2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jennifer Grau-Sánchez, Esther Duarte, Neus Ramos-Escobar, Joanna Sierpowska, Nohora Rueda, S. Redon, M. Heras, J. Pedro, Teppo Särkämö, and Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells. 2018. Music-supported therapy in the rehabilitation of subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 61 (07 2018), e191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Andreas Hinderks, Martin Schrepp, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2022. A Benchmark for the Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. SciTePress, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007188303730377Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fay Horak. 2010. Postural Compensation for Vestibular Loss. Restorative neurology and neuroscience 28 (01 2010), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-2010-0515Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Kramer, B. Walker, R. Bargar, and International Community for Auditory Display. 1999. Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda. International Community for Auditory Display. https://books.google.nl/books?id=Kv7yNwAACAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pontus Larsson, Daniel Västfjäll, Pierre Olsson, and Mendel Kleiner. 2007. When what you hear is what you see: Presence and auditory-visual integration in virtual environments. Proceedings of Presence 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Timothy H Murphy and Dale Corbett. 2009. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 10, 12 (2009), 861–872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Serenity: exploring audio-based gaming for arm-hand rehabilitation after stroke

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2022
        902 pages
        ISBN:9781450392587
        DOI:10.1145/3517428

        Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2022

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '22 Paper Acceptance Rate35of132submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format