skip to main content
research-article

Data Mining Techniques and Machine Learning Algorithms in the Multimedia System to Enhance Engineering Education

Published:07 December 2022Publication History
Skip Editorial Notes Section

Editorial Notes

EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: ACM is issuing a formal Expression of Concern for all papers published in the TALLIP Special Issue on Self-Learning Systems and Pattern Recognition and Exploitation for Multimedia Asian Information Processing while a thorough investigation takes place with regards to the integrity of the peer review process. ACM strongly suggests that papers in this special issue not be cited in the literature until ACM's investigation has concluded and final decisions have been made regarding the integrity of the peer review process.

Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In the current digital era, engineering education worldwide faces a massive challenge in education and career development. By authorizing educators and administrators to migrate to the actions, cloud services technology has transformed into the educational environment. A Multimedia assisted smart learning system (MSLS) has been suggested in this paper where universities/colleges will advocate future development and begin skill-set enhancement courses by e-learning. To classify their employment prospects at the early stage of graduation, this proposed system measures learners' academic/skill data. Machine learning and Data mining are advanced research fields whose accelerated advancement is attributable to developments in data processing research, database industry growth, and business requirements for methods capable of extracting useful information from massive data stores. In addition, for skill set evaluation, a practical algorithm is suggested to find different groups of students that lack the appropriate skill set. The anticipated student groups can be provided with opportunities by e-learning to enhance their required skill set. The findings suggest that more critical choices can boost employment prospects and overall educational development by implementing the new engineering education system.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Yousafzai B. K., Hayat M., and Afzal S.. 2020. Application of machine learning and data mining in predicting the performance of intermediate and secondary education level students. Education and Information Technologies 25, 6 (2020), 46774697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Aldowah H., Al-Samarraie H., and Fauzy W. M.. 2019. Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics 37, (2019), 1349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Injadat M., Moubayed A., Nassif A. B., and Shami A.. 2020. Systematic ensemble model selection approach for educational data mining. Knowledge-Based Systems 105992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Manogaran G., Shakeel P. M., Hassanein A. S., Kumar P. M., and Babu G. C.. 2018. Machine learning approach-based gamma distribution for brain tumour detection and data sample imbalance analysis. IEEE Access 7, (2018), 1219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Yildirim P., Birant D., and Alpyildiz T.. 2018. Data mining and machine learning in the textile industry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8, 1 (2018), e1228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Hung H. C., Liu I. F., Liang C. T., and Su Y. S.. 2020. Applying educational data mining to explore students' learning patterns in the flipped learning approach for coding education. Symmetry 12, 2 (2020), 213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Manogaran G., Srivastava G., Muthu B. A., Baskar S., Shakeel P. M., Hsu C. H., and Kumar P. M.. 2020. A response-aware traffic offloading scheme using regression machine learning for user-centric large-scale iInternet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Zeng Y.. 2020. Evaluation of physical education teaching quality in colleges based on the hybrid technology of data mining and hidden Markov model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 15, 01 (2020), 415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Buenaño-Fernandez D., Villegas-CH W., and Luján-Mora S.. 2019. The use of tools of data mining to decision making in engineering education—A systematic mapping study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 27, 3 (2019), 744758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Saa A. A., Al-Emran M., and Shaalan K.. 2019. Factors affecting students' performance in higher education: A systematic review of predictive data mining techniques. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning 24, 4 (2019), 567598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Manogaran G., Alazab M., Saravanan V., Rawal B. S., Sundarasekar R., Nagarajan S. M., and Montenegro-Marin C. E.. 2020. Machine learning assisted information management scheme in service concentrated IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Raizada S., Mala S., and Shankar A.. 2020. Vector-borne disease outbreak prediction by machine learning. In 2020 International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE). IEEE, 213218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Valls F., Redondo E., Fonseca D., Torres-Kompen R., Villagrasa S., and Martí N.. 2018. Urban data and urban design: A data mining approach to architecture education. Telematics and Informatics 35, 4 (2018), 10391052.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Ray S. and Saeed M.. 2018. Applications of educational data mining and learning analytics tools in handling big data in higher education. In Applications of Big Data Analytics. Springer, Cham, 135160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Ahmad M., Farooq U., Atta-Ur-Rahman, Alqatari A., Dash S., and Luhach A. K.. 2019. Investigating TYPE constraint for frequent pattern mining. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography 22, 4 (2019), 605626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Alom B. M. and Courtney M.. 2018. Educational data mining: Case study perspectives from primary to university education in Australia. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science 10, 2 (2018), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Papadogiannis I., Poulopoulos V., and Wallace. Machine Learning CE M.. 2020. A critical review of data mining for education: What has been done, what has been learned, and what remains to be seen. International Journal of Educational Research Review 5, 4 (2020), 353372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Sai K. B. K., Subbareddy S. R., and Luhach A. K.. 2019. IoT based air quality monitoring system using MQ135 and MQ7 with machine learning analysis. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience 20, 4 (2019), 599606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Nieto Y., García-Díaz V., Montenegro C., and Crespo R. G.. 2019. Supporting academic decision making at higher educational institutions using machine learning-based algorithms. Soft Computing 23, 12 (2019), 41454153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Sáiz Manzanares M. C., Rodriguez Diez J. J., Marticorena Sánchez R., Zaparain Yanez M. J., and Cerezo Menendez R.. 2020. Lifelong learning from sustainable education: An analysis with eye tracking and data mining techniques. Sustainability 12, 5 (2020), 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Rienties B., Simonsen H. Køhler, and Herodotou C.. 2020. Defining the boundaries between artificial intelligence in education, computer-supported collaborative learning, educational data mining, and learning analytics: A need for coherence. In Frontiers in Education 5, 128. Frontiers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Niet Y. V., Díaz V. G., and Montenegro C. E.. 2016. Academic decision-making model for higher education institutions using learning analytics. In 2016 4th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI). IEEE 2732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Shakeel P. M., Baskar S., Fouad H., Manogaran G., Saravanan V., and Montenegro-Marin C. E.. 2021. Internet of Things forensic data analysis using machine learning to identify roots of data scavenging. Future Generation Computer Systems 115, 756768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Gardner J., Yang Y., Baker R., and Brooks C.. 2018. Enabling end-to-end machine learning replicability: A case study in educational data mining. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Salloum S. A., Alshurideh M., Elnagar A., and Shaalan K.. 2020. Mining in educational data: Review and future directions. In Joint European-US Workshop on Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 92102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Prathik A., Anuradha J., and Uma K.. 2018. Survey on spatial data mining, challenges and its applications. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 15, 9–10 (2018), 27692776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Moscoso-Zea O., Saa P., and Luján-Mora S.. 2019. Evaluation of algorithms to predict graduation rate in higher education institutions by applying educational data mining. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 24, 1 (2019), 413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Romero C. and Ventura S.. 2020. Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 10, 3 (2020), e1355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Brajković E., Rakić K., and Kraljević G.. 2018. Application of data mining in e-learing systems. In 2018 17th International Symposium INFOTECH-JAHORINA (INFOTECH). IEEE, 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Rodrigues M. W., Isotani S., and Zárate L. E.. 2018. Educational data mining: A review of the evaluation process in the e-learning. Telematics and Informatics 35, 6 (2018), 17011717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Ferreira-Mello R., André M., Pinheiro A., Costa E., and Romero C.. 2019. Text mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9, 6 (2019), e1332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Abdelaziz A., Elhoseny M., Salama A. S., and Riad A. M.. 2018. A machine learning model for improving healthcare services in a cloud computing environment. Measurement 119, 117128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Sreenivasa Rao K., Swapna N., and Praveen Kumar P.. 2018. Educational data mining for student placement prediction using machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE) 7, 1.2 (2018), 4346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Souza J. T. D., Francisco A. C. D., Piekarski C. M., and Prado G. F. D.. 2019. Data mining and machine learning to promote smart cities: A systematic review from 2000 to 2018. Sustainability 11, 4 (2019), 1077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Gao Y. and Zhang S.. 2018. Design of and research on an autonomous learning system for distance education based on data mining technology. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 18, 6 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Jones K. M., Rubel A., and LeClere E.. 2020. A matter of trust: Higher education institutions as information fiduciaries in an age of educational data mining and learning analytics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71, 10 (2020), 12271241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Prathik A., Anuradha J., and Uma K.. 2019. Prediction of suitability of soil for different crops using spatial data mining [J]. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 9, 1 (2019), 23302337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Wang F., Yang N., Shakeel P. M., and Saravanan V.. 2021. Machine learning for mobile network payment security evaluation system. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, e4226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Vijayalakshmi S., Anpalagan A., Kothari D. P., Woungang I., and Obaidat M. S.. 2014. An analytical study of resource division and its impact on power and performance of multi-core processors. The Journal of Supercomputing 68, 3 (2014), 12651279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Data Mining Techniques and Machine Learning Algorithms in the Multimedia System to Enhance Engineering Education

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing
        ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing  Volume 21, Issue 6
        November 2022
        372 pages
        ISSN:2375-4699
        EISSN:2375-4702
        DOI:10.1145/3568970
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 December 2022
        • Online AM: 30 March 2022
        • Accepted: 11 February 2022
        • Revised: 17 January 2022
        • Received: 4 December 2021
        Published in tallip Volume 21, Issue 6

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Refereed
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)222
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format